Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Advice on crower cam with l92 heads?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-2008, 08:35 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
oscareltemblo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Outskirts of Detroit
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Advice on crower cam with l92 heads?

I have a 6.0 lq9 with the l92 heads ls6 springs, other mods include l92 truck intake, with 90mm TB, and long tubes, I was wondering if this cam 217 226 553 575 @114 would be a good choice for these heads i'm running. cam specs http://www.crower.com/misc/cam_spec/...0572&x=37&y=15
Old 09-11-2008, 10:56 PM
  #2  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (17)
 
oscareltemblo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Outskirts of Detroit
Posts: 203
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Has anyone run this cam I can't find it in search button?
Old 09-12-2008, 04:07 AM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

218/230 .605/.604 110+0 LSA

-1>IVO
39>IVC
45>EVO
5>EVC
110>ECL
4* Overlap

Lota of trq, early peak (due to intake), 4* overlap so a bit of chopchop

Intake 3014r
Exhaust 3036r
110 LSA
110 ICL


(Those are the specs if you like) Comp Cam XFI lobes
Old 09-12-2008, 05:34 PM
  #4  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
218/230 .605/.604 110+0 LSA

-1>IVO
39>IVC
45>EVO
5>EVC
110>ECL
4* Overlap

Lota of trq, early peak (due to intake), 4* overlap so a bit of chopchop

Intake 3014r
Exhaust 3036r
110 LSA
110 ICL


(Those are the specs if you like) Comp Cam XFI lobes
Theres a "STUMP" puller. LOL
Old 09-13-2008, 03:50 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
 
PREDATOR-Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: BFE
Posts: 14,620
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by JPH
Theres a "STUMP" puller. LOL
Well, it is a truck gonna need lots of trq.
Old 09-13-2008, 08:47 AM
  #6  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by PREDATOR-Z
Well, it is a truck gonna need lots of trq.
I know Mark, just razzin' yah.
Old 09-13-2008, 10:31 AM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
eallanboggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

You can go bigger on lift and duration. Look at the cam Predator-Z is running and that's in a car. With a truck you have a lot more weight to get rolling than he does which means you need more torque. Torque is good.
Old 09-13-2008, 11:26 AM
  #8  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by eallanboggs
You can go bigger on lift and duration. Look at the cam Predator-Z is running and that's in a car. With a truck you have a lot more weight to get rolling than he does which means you need more torque. Torque is good.
No need to go much bigger in duration IMO, it is a TRUCK and low rpm/speed with LOTS of trq is the game here. And lobe lift is determind by the lobe master(duration @050 spec), so that's probably why the lift is where it is, and with that truck intake, I don't think it's going to move anymore air after 600 lift anyways.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.