Ron@Vengeance

iTrader: (51)

Initial results look extremely promising for the new LSXR 102mm cathedral port intake manifold!!! We finally for the opportunity to do some testing today on a heads/cam C6 we have in the shop ( Thanx Allan!!!)

NO Tuning at all.


A little about our test vehicle:

2005 C6 LS2 Corvette
Manual Transmission

Modifications:

Callaway Cold Air Induction
Ported LS2 Throttlebody
LS2 Intake Manifold
TrickFlow AS CAST Cylinder Heads
Mill to 61cc
VRX5 Camshaft
1 3/4 Longtubes- CATTED
DMH Dual Cutouts
Textralia Clutch Kit
Built/Tuned by Vengeance

2 back to back Runs with LS2 Manifold/LS2 throttlebody @ operating temp.
2 Runs with FAST LSXR 102mm Manifold/GM LS2 throttlebody @ operating temp

30 PLUS RWHP/20PLUS RWTQ GAINS WITH THE LSXR manifold!!!




The next graph represents our PORTED 102mm FAST intake still using the GM LS2 throttlebody!!! The Vengence port work shows to be worth a SOLID 8RWHP and 15 ftlbs!!!


We have had 5 of these intakes in stock for almost a month now but have been unwilling to advertise/sell them until we could show their potential. The proof is in the results above!!!

Stay tuned for more testing as time allows. We will get a stock LS1 on the dyno shortly as well as a few stroker combinations. All results will be posted!!!!

GT-OH

iTrader: (7)

That is just awesome!!!

SmokedOutZ28

iTrader: (35)

Nice! Still would love to see this manifold vs a stock LS3 manifold but these results look promising.

Thanks for all the hard work & testing... Again Nice job

Ron@Vengeance

iTrader: (51)

We have already completed testing on an LS3 combo... Results were not nearly as impressive as the cathedral port 102mm.....

white mayhem

iTrader: (24)

That is a huge gain!!

Redy2Go WS6

wow, nice results! What is your recommendations for some of us LS2 guys that are looking to change intake/heads? as ive been looking into L92 heads w/ ls3 FAST 102 intake. Would it be best to remain with LS6 styled heads w/ cathedral FAST 102 instead?

the_merv

iTrader: (88)

Not too much to gain with the L92/LS3's for some reason..

ss dave

Ron please clarify something for my since I purchased the LSX manifold from you for my LS7 and have a Mamo ported 90 TB for it.
Is this a ported LSX manifold or a stocker that you tested?

Nimitz87

iTrader: (17)

reading is fundamental, the first graph is stock unported with the ported LS2 tb

2nd graph is ported, it gained 8hp/15tq still using the stock ported tb.

Chad

69LT1Bird

iTrader: (1)

Wow, that's impressive. That just shows that the general did a very good job designing and testing the LS3 intake.

marksboy7

iTrader: (6)

Can't wait to see the stroker combo results!

WADDISME

iTrader: (4)

Nice! A lot of people have been waiting on some real world numbers. Thanks.

venom ws7

iTrader: (13)

Awesome work like always Ron very nice...

I can't wait to see some results on LS1/LS6 346 H/C engine..

Thanks for the comparison do you think you'll gain anything from more tune??

4U2NV-SS

iTrader: (21)

So you think with a 102mm TB it may hit 45-50 RWHP??? Nice work

THANKS RON!!!

Jason 98 TA

iTrader: (4)

Great results guys! We're getting ready to do some engine dyno testing on a LS2 in the next couple weeks. If you guys can port one we'd like to test one on the LS2 engine dyno motor we have.

smok'nZ

iTrader: (160)

why havent you put the 102mm on that C6?

berlin 83

iTrader: (13)

I'm pumped i just ordered a 102/102 setup I'm goin to a SD tune thru a 104 lid should be pretty impressive i just wish i had an initial dyno run to make the comparision

wesam

subscribed
nice results waiting for stroker results

vette0009

post some photos of the intake

Photos are fundamental lol

Bon

GregRexAdams

Any results vs. a ported LS2?