Porting a FAST 102 LS3 and ran into this???? - LS1TECH



Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories

Porting a FAST 102 LS3 and ran into this????

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-29-2010, 10:19 AM   #1
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
4U2NV-SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 399
Default Porting a FAST 102 LS3 and ran into this????

So I port matched the lower shell to my PRC heads and then I put the runners inside and notice this.....(see picture)....see the bottom of the runner. What are you porters doing? just porting it as thin as possible? Any suggestions help.

Thanks a bunch!!!!
Attached Thumbnails
Porting a FAST 102 LS3 and ran into this????-img00134-20100728-2238.jpg   Porting a FAST 102 LS3 and ran into this????-img00135-20100728-2238.jpg  
4U2NV-SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 10:31 AM   #2
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
4U2NV-SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 399
Default

TTT.... no one esle seeing this with their set up???
4U2NV-SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 10:38 AM   #3
TECH Fanatic
 
Engine_HP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Middle East.
Posts: 1,747
Default

It got fucked.
Engine_HP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2010, 11:58 AM   #4
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
4U2NV-SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 399
Default

That is how it came from FAST. It was not noticable until I ported the lower shell.
4U2NV-SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2010, 01:21 AM   #5
TECH Fanatic
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,023
Default

that looks like a vacuum leak and tuning nightmare. I was thinking about upgrading. Your post has officially ended that plan. What does FAST say about it?
03EBZ06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2010, 10:05 AM   #6
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
thedak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 189
Default

You hogged out the lower way too much.

Nice way to waste $800.
thedak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2010, 10:15 AM   #7
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (22)
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Clewiston, FL 33440
Posts: 374
Default

whoa :/
ISMELLRICE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2010, 11:52 AM   #8
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedak View Post
You hogged out the lower way too much.

Nice way to waste $800.
I agree.....you removed to much material from the base.

Try using the slow setting JB weld and build it back a bit towards the runner flange side of the base unit (the area you over ported)

The O-ring that seals the port should still completely seal around the receiver section of the base it fits into (as long as you don't destroy the runner integrity making it super thin) and your intake will technically still function OK when you put it back together.

Its OK for the manifold to be slightly smaller than the intake port opening.....thats a preferred situation versus the opposite effect.

Good luck and be a little more conservative on the other holes assuming its not too late.

-Tony
Tony Mamo @ AFR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2010, 12:15 PM   #9
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thedak View Post
You hogged out the lower way too much.

Nice way to waste $800.
You can buy a new lower shell and start over without buying an entire new intake.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 03EBZ06 View Post
that looks like a vacuum leak and tuning nightmare. I was thinking about upgrading. Your post has officially ended that plan. What does FAST say about it?
Why, because a non professional over ported an intake and screwed it up? That's not FASTs fault, he should have left it alone or sent it to a professional like Tony, not hack it up with a dremel. (I did the same thing to a set of AFR 195 when I was a teenager, started to port out the CNC lines and the bit caught and cut a hole through the wall of the intake port Lesson learned!!)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR View Post
I agree.....you removed to much material from the base.

Its OK for the manifold to be slightly smaller than the intake port opening.....that's a preferred situation versus the opposite effect.

Good luck and be a little more conservative on the other holes assuming its not too late.
I agree too aggressive on the porting, and if you look at an unported FAST it does exactly what Tony is talking about with the overhang. FAST told me at PRI that they design the manifold so that the runner is slightly in, because that's OK, but the opposite is never good. And that if you really wanted to sand roll them even you can.

More conservative is always good advice, I didnt touch my LS3 102mm LSXR, not even with a sand roll! No issues!

Edit: I remember reading about this in the instructions;


Last edited by SweetS10V8; 07-31-2010 at 12:33 PM.
SweetS10V8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2010, 03:16 PM   #10
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
thedak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SweetS10V8 View Post
You can buy a new lower shell and start over without buying an entire new intake.

I remember reading about this in the instructions;


Wait till he sees how much just the lower is by itself...

$260
thedak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2010, 03:26 PM   #11
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (14)
 
bayer-z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: N. Falmouth MA
Posts: 4,096
Default

At least you don't have to replace the ENTIRE intake. Good feature of like the modular design..
bayer-z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2010, 10:41 AM   #12
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
4U2NV-SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 399
Default

Once I tightened down the runner it fits much better A little porting on the runner and it should be match pretty good. My main concern was the splits of the runners at the bottom. I have not call FAST yet I will tomorrow.
4U2NV-SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2010, 11:05 AM   #13
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
69LT1Bird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lapeer, MI
Posts: 2,314
Default

What are you putting the intake on? Just curious.
69LT1Bird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2010, 12:04 PM   #14
Moderator
iTrader: (4)
 
SweetS10V8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4U2NV-SS View Post
Once I tightened down the runner it fits much better A little porting on the runner and it should be match pretty good. My main concern was the splits of the runners at the bottom. I have not call FAST yet I will tomorrow.
The split of the runners is from how they are made. Just by taking it out and looking at it you can see that its a two piece design that is most likely glued together or vibration welded.

If your going this deep into porting you obviously need to start working with some epoxy which makes the split in the runner a non issue. Remember once you start porting the runners, you may screw that up and have to buy new runners and a base!!!! Your porting beyond FAST's intentions and therefore have to work around any issue you may encounter yourself. That's hot rodding in a nutshell.

If you plan on continuing, I would scribe around the runner so you can see how far you have to open up the runner to match the base and figure out when to start tapering it back into the original runner. There are many things your are changing that affect how this runner will react now. It was designed with a certain amount of taper and your changing all of that, and probably not for the better.

I have Lingenfelter CNC heads and my base lines up perfectly with no porting at all. Plus I think all this porting could cause you issues because when you bolt it all back down as an assembly every single port wall isn't going to line up exactly. Your most likely going to have some of the cylinder head on the inside of the runner creating a wall or a very large disturbance in the airflow path to the valve.

Last edited by SweetS10V8; 08-01-2010 at 12:14 PM.
SweetS10V8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2010, 10:06 AM   #15
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
iTrader: (21)
 
4U2NV-SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 399
Default

Yeah I thought about scribing it and porting it close to that. I will also seal the split. Is that JB weld stuff pretty good?
Now that the runners are bolted down it all looks like it will blend together well.
I marked the intake and heads in 2 spots were I can line it back upin the same spot.
4U2NV-SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to port a Fast 90 intake redtail2426 Generation III External Engine 91 10-30-2015 09:20 AM
FAST 102 LSXR intake runners don't want to come out Superchief-1 Generation IV External Engine 2 04-08-2015 06:52 PM
raised runner ls1 heads? nastychevelle Generation III Internal Engine 14 05-30-2011 11:41 AM
home porting heads questions redtail2426 Generation III Internal Engine 15 08-11-2010 10:44 PM
porting the lt1 intake manifold kalebm22 LT1-LT4 Modifications 10 05-09-2009 02:18 PM


Tags
102, 90, fast, fast102, intake, l76, leak, ls3, mamo, match, photos, port, porting, portingfast, tuning

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:00 AM.