My apologies...another ls3 pcv thread :( - LS1TECH

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Generation IV External Engine
Log In 
Search


Generation IV External Engine
LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories


My apologies...another ls3 pcv thread :(

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-11-2012, 08:01 PM   #1
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 23
Default My apologies...another ls3 pcv thread :(

I am installing a ls376/480 crate engine in a factory five cobra kit. Right now I have my 2 valve cover breather ports hooked up to a filtered breathable catch can and the valley breather still hooked up to the throttle body as it was delivered. (sorry I don't have any pics right now, will post some tomorrow). Is my current setup ok? I have -6AN hoses on the valve cover ports to the catchcan. I don't particularly want oil in the manifold so I was planning on T-ing the valley breather into the valve cover hoses and run it to the catchcan too. Is it ok that the catch can is filtered to the atmosphere or does it need to be sealed? and if it is not sealed will it blow oil vapor all over my engine compartment? Thanks so much for the help, sorry if these are redundant questions, I just haven't been able to find answers to my exact problem. Thanks.
Carguyrob598 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 07:40 AM   #2
TECH Addict
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Manchester, CT
Posts: 2,109
Default

If you're going to run a MAF, you've made a vacuum leak.

GM gets crankcase air from the air intake after the MAF sensor, because the lifter valley tube is pulling it through there and into the engine.

If you want to run a catch can, I'd get your fresh air to the valvecovers from after the MAF, then put a sealed catch can between the lifter valley and the intake manifold.
__________________
M6 2010 Camaro SS
2005 RCSB 5.3 Z71
Mike454SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 10:08 AM   #3
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 23
Default

Thanks for the response, that makes a lot more sense now. After some more research I'm thinking about just running it the way GM intended. Thanks for the help!
Carguyrob598 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 08:59 PM   #4
10 Second Club
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 16
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 3,050
Send a message via AIM to DietCoke
Default

LS3 style should look like this with a can.
Attached Thumbnails
My apologies...another ls3 pcv thread :(-pcv-1int.jpg  
__________________
LSXOCET - LS Powered @ 1600 lbs curb weight... being built
(OLD) 11 Camaro SS - 10.20@135 naturally aspirated @630rwhp.
DietCoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 09:01 PM   #5
10 Second Club
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 16
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 3,050
Send a message via AIM to DietCoke
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike454SS View Post
If you're going to run a MAF, you've made a vacuum leak.

GM gets crankcase air from the air intake after the MAF sensor, because the lifter valley tube is pulling it through there and into the engine.

If you want to run a catch can, I'd get your fresh air to the valvecovers from after the MAF, then put a sealed catch can between the lifter valley and the intake manifold.
What does a vacuum leak have to do with the MAF? Crankcase air is more or less sealed off from the combustion chamber and intake manifold (why do you think the factory pcv uses the intake charge to evac crank vapors? durr), it isn't going to affect any metering. That being said, a car should be tuned with a breather if you are going to run one.
__________________
LSXOCET - LS Powered @ 1600 lbs curb weight... being built
(OLD) 11 Camaro SS - 10.20@135 naturally aspirated @630rwhp.
DietCoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 10:03 PM   #6
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 23
Default

Thanks for the diagram. What about the driver's side valve cover? Cap it off? Thanks!
Carguyrob598 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 12:23 PM   #7
10 Second Club
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 16
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 3,050
Send a message via AIM to DietCoke
Default

CAp it or run a breather. Doesn't matter (I need a breather on mine)
__________________
LSXOCET - LS Powered @ 1600 lbs curb weight... being built
(OLD) 11 Camaro SS - 10.20@135 naturally aspirated @630rwhp.
DietCoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 06:14 PM   #8
Teching In
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 23
Default

Thanks Diet. How is the driver valve cover barb run from the factory?
Carguyrob598 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2012, 09:22 PM   #9
10 Second Club
 
DietCoke's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 16
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Manhattan, KS
Posts: 3,050
Send a message via AIM to DietCoke
Default

Mine was capped. It's still capped, but you could run a breather there. Mine is on the oil fill.
__________________
LSXOCET - LS Powered @ 1600 lbs curb weight... being built
(OLD) 11 Camaro SS - 10.20@135 naturally aspirated @630rwhp.
DietCoke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2012, 08:45 PM   #10
TECH Addict
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Manchester, CT
Posts: 2,109
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DietCoke View Post
What does a vacuum leak have to do with the MAF? Crankcase air is more or less sealed off from the combustion chamber and intake manifold (why do you think the factory pcv uses the intake charge to evac crank vapors? durr), it isn't going to affect any metering. That being said, a car should be tuned with a breather if you are going to run one.
Look at your own diagram. When there is vacuum on the intake side, it pulls air through the crank case from the intake bellows after the MAF sensor...it's pulling MAF metered air...if that hose from the bellows to the valve cover is open to the atmosphere, at idle and light throttle, it's pulling unmetered air.

When you're at full throttle it's not a vacuum leak because there's no vacuum. If you have a lot of blow by in your setup, yes the stock system can result in pushing that air back the other way into the intake bellows, and that's why a lot of real high power drag engines run breathers instead of PCV.

There's really 2 solutions to a need for breathers instead of a "stock style" PCV system...speed density tuning is 1 solution, no MAF in the mix means it's all calculated from plenum pressure anyways, and doesn't matter what path air takes to get into the plenum. The other solution is completely remove PVC from the equation and ONLY run breathers. If you cap the intake behind the throttle body, and cap the lifter valley, and just put a breather where the oil cap was, you're good to go, blowby isn't going to cause a pressure issue, and you won't get oil in the intake manifold...you MIGHT get oil dripping from the breather, and in that case, put your oil cap back, and plumb both valve covers to a catch can, then put a breather on the catch can...it shouldn't get wet as easily...PCV is really just an emissions thing anyways...and if you're built enough that you're making enough power to the point where blowby is a big deal...you probably don't care about emissions.

Once you've done that, you can probabaly ALSO look into some type of a crank evac system instead. Something that will use exhaust to pull vacuum on the crank case.
__________________
M6 2010 Camaro SS
2005 RCSB 5.3 Z71
Mike454SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2012, 03:01 PM   #11
TECH Fanatic
 
1lejohn's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 9
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pasadena Texas
Posts: 1,303
Default

If you loose the green hose going from the valve cover to the T-body and add a breather on that same cover. It works just fine. The motor when under vacuum pulls air and acid mist etc. from the valley cover and runs it throught the catch can and returns it back into the intake and burns it. The breather will allow the motor to take in or exhaust what ever it needs to do.

Mine is like that and has little to no oil mist coming from the breather. My little air water seperator for an air compressor works great at catching and dropping out the oil from the PCV.
__________________
99 Hugger Orange 1LE Camaro A4
New Combo L-92 Block and Heads 416ci
Built by The Head Shop. The heads are fully ported, L76 intake, custom FTI cam and valve train. Tuned by Flaco.Dyno results 508 hp at 5800.
Thanks to Jerry, Shawn,Ed,Flaco,and Richard.

04 2500HD 4x4 The parts Chaser
89 5.0 coupe The 10 year project.

Last edited by 1lejohn; 01-20-2012 at 03:06 PM.
1lejohn is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Carburated LS1 PCV System/ Catch Can Setup Pressure Problems Slowjammin Carbureted LSX Forum 7 02-21-2015 11:01 PM
MM BLack PCV Catch Can Install TornadoSS Gen 5 Camaro External Bolt-On Tech 0 02-24-2014 06:54 PM
Going crazy with pcv and breather questions on 1000hp cars scantone1 Generation III Internal Engine 3 09-04-2013 11:30 AM
PCV Oil Catch Can. Is this correct??? picture inside Badazz 97 TA LT1-LT4 Modifications 53 03-01-2012 01:58 PM
Catchcan PCV system vs valve cover breathers. SmaknaSS Generation III Internal Engine 33 09-14-2005 04:48 PM


Tags
air, breather, cap, coupling, cover, crate, delete, fresh, high, ls2, ls3, oil, pcv, vacuum, valve


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


 

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - JOBS
Emails & Contact Details