Generation IV External Engine LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

lightened internals= better mpg?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-03-2012, 03:18 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
bp944's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default lightened internals= better mpg?

I was looking at the components to do a engine buildup and I realized that if you do it right you can take a lot of weight out of the engine. This is all rough math but a callies crank can be 5-15lbs lighter, a set of rods can be 1-2 pounds, pistons can be 1 pound. Along with a 5-10 pound lighter flywheel. Its almost conceivable to pull off 20 lbs on the moving internals. How much does that result in mpgs? I'd be doing this for power but if you had a stock internals and forged but were the same specs what would be the difference in mpg?
Old 02-03-2012, 07:40 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
S10xGN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Port Neches, TX
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

I wouldn't think it would help anything at a "steady state" cruise, a lighter rotating mass mainly aids in acceleration...
Old 02-03-2012, 08:04 PM
  #3  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

I wouldn't think it would help anything at a "steady state" cruise, a lighter rotating mass mainly aids in acceleration...
Why not? Any increase in efficiency and power will result in less throttle needed to keep the car going at a steady rate, thus increasing MPGs.
Old 02-03-2012, 08:25 PM
  #4  
Staging Lane
 
wadd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

might give better mileage around town due to lower rotating inertial but the effects will likely be very small. No difference in steady state driving since loses are due to friction (bearings, rings/bore). It's possible there might be a slight reduction in piston side loading, but again, likely wouldn't show up in improved mileage.
Old 02-03-2012, 10:17 PM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
3rdCoastPowerSports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Loony Bin
Posts: 1,154
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

i wouldn't think you would really see any better MPG
Old 02-04-2012, 04:44 AM
  #6  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (18)
 
LS1MCSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dover, Arkansas
Posts: 3,831
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

One thing you most likely will see is less durability.
Old 02-04-2012, 05:23 AM
  #7  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (8)
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 5,927
Received 412 Likes on 330 Posts

Default

I have taken about 42lb off my rotating mass, no diff in mpg.
Old 02-04-2012, 06:17 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (36)
 
davidws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Kansas
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I think it would help, but the results would probably be minimal.

One thing that helps for mileage is optimizing your timing tables.
I've seen many timing tables below 40 > 50 kpa flat to WOT. Yet there can be a few degrees added in the cruise regions without any detonation. Then after optimizing your timing table, you'll probably have to take out a little fuel as the fuel trims go positive cause the engine is more efficient.
Old 02-04-2012, 03:17 PM
  #9  
TECH Regular
 
john kilgore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: burbank ca
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

learn to drive with a vaccuum guage
Old 02-04-2012, 09:37 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (11)
 
S10xGN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Port Neches, TX
Posts: 3,782
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redtan
Why not? Any increase in efficiency and power will result in less throttle needed to keep the car going at a steady rate, thus increasing MPGs.
Just to clear it up, a steady state cruise requires a certain amount of HP (disregarding incidentals like wind, elevation changes, etc) to maintain a given speed. Messing with the rotating assembly will have zero effect on that required HP number. Hence, no change in the engine's HP output.



Quick Reply: lightened internals= better mpg?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 AM.