370 vs 408 - LS1TECH

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Generation IV Internal Engine
Log In 
Search


Generation IV Internal Engine
2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9
Sponsored by
ERL Performance


View Poll Results: 370 or 408
370 6 19.35%
408 25 80.65%
Voters: 31. You may not vote on this poll

370 vs 408

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-29-2009, 08:43 AM   #1
On The Tree
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 162
Default 370 vs 408

I am having somewhat of a dilemma. I'm getting mixed answers to this question every time I ask.

My block is sitting at the machine shop waiting for me to figure out what I want to do as far as a short block. My top end for the time being will be an L92 head, Vic Jr Carb intake, and a custom ground cam for which ever combination I chose. I will most likely have a plate kit on the car with a shot ranging from 150 to 200.

This motor will be going into a Notchback mustang that will weigh about 2800 lbs with me in it. It will most likely be backed by a manual valve bodied 4L65e. It will be street driven.

Ok now down to the options:

High revving 370 with built valve train. Rev limiter set to 7800 shift at 7600. 11:1 compression ratio. Stall will be somewhere in the 4000 range.

or

408. Callies compstar crank & rods. Forged Pistons (Diamond). Probably only revving to 6600 or so. Stall around 3200-3500.

Now the issue is the fact that the car is so light (relatively speaking) that I don't need tons and tons of torque and that the 370 would probably benefit me more at the track, but for a mostly street car I figured the 408 would be more fun to lug around.

If you need any other information let me know.

Last edited by Tunink; 10-29-2009 at 11:52 AM.
Tunink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 10:10 AM   #2
On The Tree
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 162
Default

No one?
Tunink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 10:22 AM   #3
TECH Fanatic
 
MelScrilla's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 1,139
Default

I would do the 408 as you can't beat the cubes, plus less rpm's will be easier on the motor. I would think a 408 would do better at the track too.

And with the same parts it takes in the valve train to turn the 370 to 7200 you could do the same thing with the 408 if you wanted to.
__________________
01 Z28- Magnaflow catback, A4, 4:10's, SLP Lid, more power coming soon......

94 Integra - daily driver

New Project: 275 Fox.......Details still in the works
MelScrilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 10:56 AM   #4
Staging Lane
 
ViaBellator's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 97
Default

I agree with MelScrilla

You could talk all day about piston speed, and safe RPM ranges, but for most applications, a 408 can spin as fast as a 370 with only a marginal increase in risk.
ViaBellator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 05:12 PM   #5
LS1TECH Sponsor
 
Trevor @ Texas Speed & Perf.'s Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Posts: 4,387
Default

I'd definitely go with a 408. It'll definitely be more fun on the street, but I would be VERY concerned with backing up a high-revving engine with a 4L65. Honestly, for all of the additional valvetrain upgrades you'll need to turn the added RPM with the 370, the 408 will probably work out to the same overall price, if not cheaper!

We have quite a few 408 cid iron short-blocks in stock and ready to ship, so let us know if we can help you out! We also have all of our strokers on special with free truck freight shipping in the continental US through Thanksgiving!

Trevor
Texas Speed & Performance
__________________

Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Trevor @ Texas Speed & Perf. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 11:52 PM   #6
TECH Apprentice
 
Bader-X's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Kuwait
Posts: 386
Default

if the heads and intake are the same on both set ups then I say 408 ....

if by going with the 370 you`ll use better heads or say all pro then the 370

and the the 408 you`ll get more hp and tq all over the rpm and maybe 20-30 hp at the top
Bader-X is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 11:56 PM   #7
Restricted User
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 295
Default

Always go for more cubes when possible.
FMS_FTW is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-30-2009, 09:11 AM   #8
On The Tree
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 162
Default

Still can't make up my mind. Engine builder wants me to build the 370 with closer to 12:1 comp ratio and mechanical roller cam. He says that the hyd. lifters will have trouble spinning up to where I want to be with the 370.

We'll see.

Any real suggestions. I haven't committed to anything yet, other than the L92 heads, so a 408 is still in it, even though 90% of the people I talk to around here are saying that a higher spinning 370 will do better in a light weight car.
Tunink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2009, 09:12 AM   #9
TECH Apprentice
 
cam75w/ls1's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 305
Default

I've had good luck w/ the 370 combo since the rod length/stroke ratio is better for high revving. Works good in lightweight car.
__________________
2006 Corvette
2000 S10(LS powered)
1967 427 Camaro
1974 GTO
cam75w/ls1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2009, 11:04 AM   #10
FormerVendor
 
XtraCajunSS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Baton Rouge, LA, USA
Posts: 1,955
Default

A properly setup hyd roller valvetrain will have no problems turning 8K+ you just have to know what you're doing. If you have the means, a 408 would definitely be the way to go. You could always upgrade to a SR valvetrain later for even more power.

There is no substitute for cubic inches... besides a power adder...

Shane
XtraCajunSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2009, 12:13 PM   #11
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 99
Default

iwould go 408 for sure.
flatchat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-31-2009, 02:00 PM   #12
Teching In
 
00CAMARO408's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: SAN ANTONIO,TEXAS
Posts: 18
Default

408 ALL THE WAY...I JUST FINISHED PUTTING MINE IN MY CAR
__________________
07 TAHOE LIFTED WITH 6.0 AND 4L80 SWAP
00 CAMARO 408 STROKER R.I.P
69 C10 SHORTBED STEPSIDE 6.0,AUTO 6 SPEED,WITH A FRONT MOUNT SNAIL
00CAMARO408 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 11:14 AM   #13
11 Second Club
 
mygto's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tidewater, VA
Posts: 47
Default

408!:d
__________________
"Yea though I walk through the valley of rice, I shall fear no turbo, for Procharger & LS7 art with me"

www.fquick.com/mygto
mygto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2009, 11:40 AM   #14
Banned
 
99blancoSS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 115
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ST Helens, OR
Posts: 9,894
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by XtraCajunSS View Post
A properly setup hyd roller valvetrain will have no problems turning 8K+ you just have to know what you're doing. If you have the means, a 408 would definitely be the way to go. You could always upgrade to a SR valvetrain later for even more power.

There is no substitute for cubic inches... besides a power adder...

Shane
+1 for Shane and Melscrilla
99blancoSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2009, 02:27 PM   #15
On The Tree
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 162
Default

Well. I made my purchase today. I post results when I get them.

Thanks for the input.
Tunink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 12:57 PM   #16
TECH Resident
 
fatmat80's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: oakland, ca
Posts: 876
Default

another vote for the 408!!!
fatmat80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2009, 02:30 PM   #17
Teching In
 
OH2LE's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: ALTOONA,IA
Posts: 23
Send a message via AIM to OH2LE
Default

my vote. 408
OH2LE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-09-2009, 03:22 AM   #18
TECH Enthusiast
 
MNR-0's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Posts: 647
Default

Same bore, just different strokes?

If same bore, my preference would be the 370
MNR-0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2009, 12:43 PM   #19
On The Tree
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Odessa, TX
Posts: 178
Default

built a 402 steel 6.0L block, ET 5.3Lcnc heads, 238/240 cam, Fast 90
made 555/525 flywheel

built a 366 LS2 block, out of the box 225cc Darts, 227/235 cam, Fast 90
made 526/492 flywheel

The 402 above in my opinion was a disappointment it was removed from the car in less than 350 miles for oil cunsumption. The 366 shows more potential in my opinion as if it had some more cam and alittle more head it would be on that 402's back door. Steel block has also shown more power in the past in back to back comparisons.

370 all the way for me! 4.00 stroke dissapointments me everytime I use it in someway form and fashion.
__________________

2006 GTO NHRA C/A 7.37 184.75 mph 356 ci 1000 hp 2315 lbs
1993/2002 Camaro NHRA Stocker: cam only 11.19 119.5 mph, DA 5500 ft. Under construction to be a 275 DR 388ci. LS2 F1-C
2002 Formula LS1 A/SA 6.96 98 mph at 5200 ft. about .80 under
2010 Cadillac Escalade
2011 Cadillac CTS-V 2 dr. 6 speed
MAC4264 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2009, 01:08 PM   #20
Teching In
 
LSX350Z's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 17
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tunink View Post
I am having somewhat of a dilemma. I'm getting mixed answers to this question every time I ask.

My block is sitting at the machine shop waiting for me to figure out what I want to do as far as a short block. My top end for the time being will be an L92 head, Vic Jr Carb intake, and a custom ground cam for which ever combination I chose. I will most likely have a plate kit on the car with a shot ranging from 150 to 200.

This motor will be going into a Notchback mustang that will weigh about 2800 lbs with me in it. It will most likely be backed by a manual valve bodied 4L65e. It will be street driven.

Ok now down to the options:

High revving 370 with built valve train. Rev limiter set to 7800 shift at 7600. 11:1 compression ratio. Stall will be somewhere in the 4000 range.

or

408. Callies compstar crank & rods. Forged Pistons (Diamond). Probably only revving to 6600 or so. Stall around 3200-3500.

Now the issue is the fact that the car is so light (relatively speaking) that I don't need tons and tons of torque and that the 370 would probably benefit me more at the track, but for a mostly street car I figured the 408 would be more fun to lug around.

If you need any other information let me know.
There is no replacement for displacement! I would go with the 408!
__________________
LS7 350z build (in progress) with (aluminum block) 7.2L stroker with 12.1 cr, Fast 102mm intake, Lingenfelter GT21 LS7 Camshaft 243/259 .691/.702 w 1.8 rocker 112 CL and MoTeC EMS.
LSX350Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Twins or single? 408" foxbody street car BOOSTAT4500 Forced Induction 0 11-28-2014 11:31 PM
Carb LQ9 build- 370 or stroker,ls3 or cathedral heads? darren s Generation III Internal Engine 4 11-24-2014 11:46 PM
408+Nitrous Silverado SS ~900HP sss408 Vehicle Classifieds 5 11-26-2012 07:01 AM
Carbing a 5.3 and need some help. 66 elcam Carbureted LSX Forum 19 10-05-2012 11:55 PM
Super Victor vs Victor Jr. thirdgenbum Generation III External Engine 15 06-12-2010 06:34 PM


Tags
370, 402, 408, 427, carb, corvette, engines, forged, head, hke, l92, ls, ls2, motor, stroker


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


 

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC2
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - JOBS
Emails & Contact Details