370 ci, Pat G cam. AI LS3 heads, FAST 102/102 sound good?
#1
370 ci, Pat G cam. AI LS3 heads, FAST 102/102 sound good?
I'm in the middle of a build I've yet to see the exact same combo. I'm building an Iron 370 with these particulars in the air. Let me get some opinions from you guys. Car's a daily driver and I don't mind crude (to most people) street manners. I'm currently having a Cam spec'd by Patrick G for big N/A numbers and n2o numbers (250+ shot). I'm wanting the cam to chop as hard or harder than my prior ASA cam (which was on a 110 LSA). Also lift should be no more than .650" to stay within below spring tolerances. Already paypal'd him funds for his recommendation (haven't recieved it yet), but being that the heads are in the air, that could change what he needs for a more absolute decision.
1. Ported FAST LSXR 102/102 loaded w/60 lb/hr injectors (don't wanna run out of injector )
2. Advanced Induction LS3 heads with Manley Nextek Dual .650 springs and Ferrea Hollow valves. I'm guessing compression will be the average 11.2:1 - 11.3:1. I'm not scared to go higher though.
I decided the above head decision on "bang for buck" factor as most know. Feel free to give guidance on everything except the 370 ci. That's set in stone.
1. Ported FAST LSXR 102/102 loaded w/60 lb/hr injectors (don't wanna run out of injector )
2. Advanced Induction LS3 heads with Manley Nextek Dual .650 springs and Ferrea Hollow valves. I'm guessing compression will be the average 11.2:1 - 11.3:1. I'm not scared to go higher though.
I decided the above head decision on "bang for buck" factor as most know. Feel free to give guidance on everything except the 370 ci. That's set in stone.
#5
Well Pat got back to me with cam specs no where near the duration of JPH's 239/251. It's way less. So I guess my question would be shared with 94 guy's. Why 239/251?
69LT1Bird: Hardly a waste of money. Here's a comparo of a PORTED LS7 vs un ported FAST 102. Here
69LT1Bird: Hardly a waste of money. Here's a comparo of a PORTED LS7 vs un ported FAST 102. Here
#7
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Well Pat got back to me with cam specs no where near the duration of JPH's 239/251. It's way less. So I guess my question would be shared with 94 guy's. Why 239/251?
69LT1Bird: Hardly a waste of money. Here's a comparo of a PORTED LS7 vs un ported FAST 102. Here
69LT1Bird: Hardly a waste of money. Here's a comparo of a PORTED LS7 vs un ported FAST 102. Here
Trending Topics
#8
Well Pat got back to me with cam specs no where near the duration of JPH's 239/251. It's way less. So I guess my question would be shared with 94 guy's. Why 239/251?
69LT1Bird: Hardly a waste of money. Here's a comparo of a PORTED LS7 vs un ported FAST 102. Here
69LT1Bird: Hardly a waste of money. Here's a comparo of a PORTED LS7 vs un ported FAST 102. Here
#9
Joe: Thank you for the clarification. For something as critical as a cam, I'm sure you'd understand why anyone would question an answer as simple as your first response. Yeah Pat G's specs were smaller and tighter. But he has kinda proven himself on this board with solid numbers both on the dyno and the track. I mean, 500+rwhp heads/cam (hydraulic roller) 346s are few and far between. He did that. Now, I told him I want aggresive power on this build so I'm expecting it to be over 500 rwhp N/A for my 370 as he did the same with a 346. When this build completes around the first week of January, I'll be posting dyno numbers with track times. It'll only do one of two things, disappoint or make me happy and it'll be another check in the box for him proving himself.
VertC6: it's around the 23x/24x .61x/.62x 112+3 if I remember correctly and I don't remember any of the other specs. I have it at home.
VertC6: it's around the 23x/24x .61x/.62x 112+3 if I remember correctly and I don't remember any of the other specs. I have it at home.