Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Generation IV Internal Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search

Generation IV Internal Engine
2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9
Sponsored by
ERL Performance

Welcome to LS1Tech.com!
Welcome to LS1Tech.com.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join LS1Tech.com today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-04-2011, 02:00 AM   #1
Staging Lane
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Berlin, CT
Posts: 56
Default Not interested in horsepower - Best way to increase low end torque?

I'm going to pose a question that I think is shared by some of us "more seasoned" (read: older ) drivers out here. After owning a few performance cars, I find myself a lot less interested in the "Horsepower" number; which really should be described as "Maximum Horsepower", and exists in a place way up on the rpm scale that most of us (well, me, anyway) spend very little time. In my 2012 LS3, I'm a lot more interested in the torque curve line, and I would be perfectly happy with 400 ft/lbs of torque at 4,600 rpm (as opposed to the rated 420) if I could also keep that 400 ft/lbs all the way down to 2,000 rpm (as opposed to the rated 350, which really feels more like 250). In other words, I'd rather lift the "tail" of the torque curve rather than the "head"; if the head comes up 50 ft/lbs, that's fine - just not the objective. What the horsepower rating is at 5500 rpm doesn't concern me at all. It's a date car, not a drag car.
My experience with building motors in the past indicates that - short of a $7,000 supercharger -the cam(s) can be one of the most influential components in shaping the torque curve; but it seems most people are only interested in hearing about more horsepower, so the manufacturers (rightly so) build what people say they want, and there seems to be very little technically sound advice on creating a flat torque curve from 2,000 - 5,000 rpm. I would be very interested if anyone could share their experience and/or knowledge about reshaping the bottom of an LS3 torque curve without a supercharger, and without a lot of exhaust noise - i.e. specific cams or cam profiles that really worked.

THANKS in advance for your time. Jon

Last edited by Nexus9; 12-04-2011 at 02:05 AM..
Nexus9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 06:01 AM   #2
TECH Junkie
Garage is empty, add now
 
WKMCD's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 2
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 3,426
Default

Adding lift and tightening up the stock lsa a bunch is one way. Gears is another.

Just my $.02
__________________
The Gentleman's Cruiser - Deceased 12/6/2013
Mild 427 - 576RWHP 530RWT WCCH Stage 3 L92's (Still with a very small cam)
Build Thread
http://ls1tech.com/forums/generation...b-c-d-e-f.html
WKMCD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 08:56 AM   #3
TECH Addict
Garage is empty, add now
 
HioSSilver's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 6
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winchester, VA
Posts: 2,743
Send a message via ICQ to HioSSilver
Default

Headers will put alot of low to mid-range in it also.
__________________
'99 SS Camaro #3789 6m hard top, crate ls6
new #'s 417whp 395wtq on a Dyno Dynamics
new best 11.2 @ 129.x
old best 11.05 @ 131.3 N/A... stop asking Mike how much I'm sprayin
Ain't **** with out a faceplated t56
Terminated Notch super swap
Quote:
Originally Posted by sw07gt View Post
Hio is actually right
HioSSilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 12:12 PM   #4
cam
TECH Addict
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 9
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,364
Default

Quote:
which really feels more like 250)
Have you tuned it yet? The "feels like less" is most likely torque management preventing you from getting the actual power it has onto the ground. But if torque is all you want? Get as much advance ground into the cam as PTV allows and keep the duration below 220 and the thing will tug harder down low than a freightliner
__________________
cam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 12:24 PM   #5
10 Second Club
Garage is empty, add now
 
raymond mckinney's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 4
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: tampa, fl
Posts: 1,222
Send a message via AIM to raymond mckinney
Default

Small cam,headers and a tune will get you a huge improvement in tq and feel. And if its not enough a set of gears will do the trick.
__________________

98 camaro Z28 A3 408 12.1, TFS 235, SR cam, N20 Direct port[/b] 67 Camaro 408,Ls3,6spd,N20 Plate
96 camaro SS#56 m6 398,200 Hit | 02 EB Z06 AFR 205 59cc, G5x3 Cam
raymond mckinney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 03:49 PM   #6
TECH Senior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 9
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: FaBuLoUs HELL
Posts: 8,480
Default

Good heads with lots of velocity, tight quench, cam matched to your specs (pat g is one of the best), and the right gears
Tainted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 05:51 PM   #7
TECH Regular
Garage is empty, add now
 
Hard Core Z28's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Over Here and Over There
Posts: 450
Default

Tri Y Headers is what you are looking for.
__________________
2001 Camaro Z28
Is it stock or is it not!
Hard Core Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 06:03 PM   #8
12 Second Club
2001 Pontiac Trans Am
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 20
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Burbank, Illinois
Posts: 2,560
Default

How about a 454 from a 1992 454 SS comes to mind
Just my .02
__________________
01 Ws6,m6, ASC#618 of 1583,AES built forged 416,ArP'd,Morels,LPE Ls3 heads 12-1 comp,FAST 102 by chris1313,N/W 102 Tb,Racetronix F/P,65lb inj,C5r T/C, LsR 243/259 .624 114+3,P/B 10% Ud,Kooks 2" headers,Kooks yp,Dmh dual c/o's,COMPLETE UMI suspension,SLP Torque arm,viperized T56 by wrencher,Textrellia,Moser 9" spooled w/4.11's & 35 spline axles, Koni 4th Gen's,BMR springs,Sjm abs delete,magna flow CB, 542hp/525tq StraightLine Tuned!
litle88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 06:40 PM   #9
TECH Enthusiast
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 528
Default

More cubic inches is a great way to increase low end torque. A 4 inch stoke with your existing LS3 heads and a custom cam would provide a significant gain.
COPO9560 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 10:09 PM   #10
Launching!
Garage is empty, add now
 
topbrent's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 218
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by WKMCD View Post
Adding lift and tightening up the stock lsa a bunch is one way. Gears is another.

Just my $.02
Yup, headers, higher lift, faster lobes, tighter lobe separation angle, earlier intake valve closing point, are some of the basics.
topbrent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 10:23 PM   #11
TECH Regular
Garage is empty, add now
 
ramairroughneck's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 35
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Atoka,OK
Posts: 459
Default

Gears, gears, gears. Instant throttle response you can feel. The others you'll have to look on a dyno sheet to be able to tell if gained anything.
__________________
Black WS6 Sold
Hugger Orange Camaro
DSOM C6 Z06
ramairroughneck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 10:24 PM   #12
Staging Lane
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Berlin, CT
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by litle88 View Post
How about a 454 from a 1992 454 SS comes to mind
Just my .02
Ha ha... NOW we're talkin...!
Nexus9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 10:41 PM   #13
Staging Lane
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Berlin, CT
Posts: 56
Default

Okay, thanks for all the input. I don't want to go too wild on this thing (boring, stoking etc) - remember, for $8,000 I can install an Edelbrock supercharger and solve the whole problem with an easy install - so I need to be able to justify the internal motor work with at least $3,000 left in my pocket. What I'm coming up with here is a set of LG Motorsports Long Tube Street headers with X-pipes, a K&N FIPK, a cam and a tune. The cam data I can accumulate is different from what I'm used to using (Harley world) - so I have a few questions regarding that:

1. What would be considered the highest lift reasonable for stock valve springs?

2. How does one calculate neccesary pushrod length?

3. Does separation angle affect IVC? Very little IVC information from the cam manufacturers out there, can I calculate it from Duration / Separation angle / Centerline?

4. How do I adjust total advance/retard of the cam - I don't see any adjustable sprockets. Custom grinding?

5. The 111 - 112 LSA cams I have heard on YouTube have noticeably rough idles - at about what point does the idle start to smooth out? 114 fairly smooth?

Thanks again for your valuable time. Jon

Last edited by Nexus9; 12-04-2011 at 11:30 PM..
Nexus9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 10:46 PM   #14
TECH Senior Member
Garage is empty, add now
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 9
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: FaBuLoUs HELL
Posts: 8,480
Default

1: stock springs will not do
2: pushrod length checker
3: got me here
4: most people go dot to dot method
5: the higher the lsa the smoother, but a lot has to do with tune as well
Tainted is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-04-2011, 11:56 PM   #15
Staging Lane
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Berlin, CT
Posts: 56
Default

Okay, after a little cam spec study, I've got the answer to 3. - the all important IVC. (still can't figure out why that's such an obscure figure in the car world) Using Duration and Centerline, we would divide Intake duration in half and distribute that before and (most important) after centerline to get IVC. For example:

Comp Cams 269LR HR12

Duration at .050" = 219*

Lobe Centerline = 107* ATDC.

219/2 = 109.5*

Distributing 109.5* before and after 107* ATDC, the intake valve will be open .050" at 2.5* BTDC and would be .050" from closing at 36.5* ABDC. Stock IVC at .050 is 43* ABDC, so this CC 269LR would boost Dynamic Compression Ratio and cold cranking pressure about 5 psi.

That's helpful in determining how a motor will behave with a particular cam in it. Separation angle must be determining overlap. I need to spin the cam around in my brain a few cycles to get a handle on that, and right now, it just TOO DARN LATE...!
Nexus9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 01:49 AM   #16
TECH Senior Member
2000 Chevrolet Camaro
My Garage
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 123
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,634
Default

I've always had success, and recommend the LPE GT11 cam for that strong, instant tq, sot, throttle response. I've had this cam in heavy auto cars, and recommended based on my experience with it. Don't let it's low duration fool you, it's aggressive but IMO will deliver what u are looking for. It also a profile suited for rectangle port heads, although originally designed for cathedral port heads. It is extremely responsive in 6.0 motors with common scr.
NemeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 04:55 AM   #17
Launching!
Garage is empty, add now
 
topbrent's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Northern Utah
Posts: 218
Default

Here is a handy calculator for figuring open/close points.

Camshaft Intake Open/Close Calculator: http://www.wallaceracing.com/cam-deg-calc.php

Comp 269LR HR12 Cam specs: http://www.compcams.com/Company/CC/c...ookieSupport=1
- .607/.614 - 219/227 - 112/107

IVO 2.5 BTDC
IVC 36.5 ABDC
EVO 50.5 ATDC
EVC -3.5 BBDC
Overlap -1

Looks like it would be a snappy and responsive cam.
topbrent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 10:26 AM   #18
Staging Lane
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Berlin, CT
Posts: 56
Default

Brent,

Thanks, that's exactly what I was looking for.

Jon
Nexus9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 11:27 AM   #19
Staging Lane
Garage is empty, add now
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Berlin, CT
Posts: 56
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by NemeSS View Post
I've always had success, and recommend the LPE GT11 cam for that strong, instant tq, sot, throttle response. I've had this cam in heavy auto cars, and recommended based on my experience with it. Don't let it's low duration fool you, it's aggressive but IMO will deliver what u are looking for. It also a profile suited for rectangle port heads, although originally designed for cathedral port heads. It is extremely responsive in 6.0 motors with common scr.
NemeSS;

That looks like a good cam - a lot of lift, short duration. And no, I'm not fooled by short duration, and I'm not another one of these guys who think that small numbers = bad, large numbers = good. My experience with cam installations is that shorter duration, higher lift cams with earlier intake closing (to a point) "feel" a lot more powerful in normal day to day driving - although they also sign off earlier in the rpm band. Which I'm good with - I don't want to have to downshift two gears every time I pass a car.
I talked to Ryan at Lingenfelter, and answered two more questions: The LSA on this cam is 118. When I listened to a YouTube video of this cam installed in an LS3, it sounded good - low and throaty but not choppy (which is what I want) A lot of guys are really pushing the limits with these 111 - 112 LSA cams, but I'd rather stay a little closer to the stock LSA. Using the Wallace Racing calculator, we get an IVC of 45.5 - which won't improve CCP that much.
The next important question answered is the limits of the stock springs, which Ryan said was about .580 - not much higher than the stock cam lift of .551.
More pieces fall in to place. Thanks for the help and good info.

Last edited by Nexus9; 12-05-2011 at 05:16 PM..
Nexus9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2011, 11:27 AM
LS1Tech
Pontiac Firebird




Paid Advertisement
Reply

Tags
060, accessport, cam, cobb, curve, end, gt11, headers, horsepower, hp, increase, lingenfelter, low, ls3, show, torque, wrong


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Went back to the Dyno.... hrcslam LT1-LT4 Modifications 36 09-12-2014 02:42 PM
434 CID Engine Dyno results w/ AFR 245's Tony Mamo @ AFR Dynamometer Results & Comparisons 36 09-17-2011 05:47 PM
For those who want big nasty cams with lots of lift, etc... J-Rod Advanced Engineering Tech 65 04-18-2011 04:25 PM
Next R&D "bullet" about to hit the dyno.... Tony Mamo @ AFR Generation III Internal Engine 40 09-05-2010 06:12 AM
AFR Heads....STILL getting the job done! Tony Mamo @ AFR Generation III Internal Engine 91 12-20-2009 10:28 PM



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Statement - JOBS
Emails & Contact Details