Did any one done 442ci stroker with LQ4/LQ9 block - LS1TECH

Go Back   LS1TECH > LS1-LS2-LS3-LS6-LS7 PERFORMANCE > Generation IV Internal Engine
Sign in using an external account
Register Forgot Password?
Search


Generation IV Internal Engine
2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9
Sponsored by
ERL Performance

Did any one done 442ci stroker with LQ4/LQ9 block

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-23-2012, 05:54 PM   #1
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia - Jeddah / Yanbu Royal Commission
Posts: 476
Default Did any one done 442ci stroker with LQ4/LQ9 block

I'm thinking of making 442ci with LQ4/LQ9 block, boring to 4.070" and using 4.25" stroke with compression of 11.8 against LS3 heads. I'm seeking 600rwph with 540rwtq. This will be a weekend toy...

Has any one done this kind of project?
__________________
The dream of LS1 with 441ci
LS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2012, 06:06 PM   #2
TECH Fanatic
 
dmelvin's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 8
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Rock Port, MO
Posts: 1,924
Default

I think with the iron blocks and a 4.25" stroke, you run a risk of going into consumption issues, also the piston will a lot of rock at BDC with an iron block using a 4.25" stroke.
__________________
Denton

[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
'02 Silverado LM7- Cammed/Heads/Stalled/PBlvl2/3k Circle-D/LTs/BB Tuned
'68 C10 - Project on Hold
dmelvin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 05:27 AM   #3
TECH Apprentice
 
FlamingTA's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 8
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 387
Default

no way. 4.125" stroke is the max on a regular sleeve block and that is pushing it.
__________________
2000 Black TA TH350, Moser 9 w/3.70's, TNT nitrous kit, etc. SOLD
2006 GTO Out with the 6.0, in with the 421.
FlamingTA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 09:04 AM   #4
TECH Junkie
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Watertown, MA
Posts: 3,055
Default

Even a 4.100 stroke is pushing it on the stock block.

Stick with a 4.000 stroke.
redtan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 09:56 AM   #5
12 Second Club
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 49
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,142
Send a message via ICQ to bww3588 Send a message via Yahoo to bww3588
Default

Agreed, I've also seen 4 inch stroke engines with oil consumption and ring seal issues. More prominent on longer stroke engines but still
bww3588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 09:58 AM   #6
TECH Veteran
 
87silverbullet's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 11
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Slidell,LA
Posts: 4,868
Default

As everybody else has stated, it is ill-advised to do so.
__________________
87silverbullet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 12:26 PM   #7
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia - Jeddah / Yanbu Royal Commission
Posts: 476
Default

Eric at HKE seems done lSX engine with 4.25" stroke, but i don not know if done 442ci?
Sleeved Blocks
See post no. 11
__________________
The dream of LS1 with 441ci
LS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 12:30 PM   #8
On The Tree
 
6D9 Matt's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 182
Default

I dont think I would recommend it, but hey, anything is possible these days.
__________________
1969 Camaro
LS3 / T56 Magnum / 9"
6D9 Matt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 12:39 PM   #9
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia - Jeddah / Yanbu Royal Commission
Posts: 476
Default

I think their is a problem founded with the 4.25" stroke, it require longer cylinder wall which at end may require re-sleeving. I have to check.
ls1 4.250 stroke
See post no 8
__________________
The dream of LS1 with 441ci
LS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 12:54 PM   #10
TECH Junkie
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Watertown, MA
Posts: 3,055
Default

Quote:
I think their is a problem founded with the 4.25" stroke, it require longer cylinder wall which at end may require re-sleeving. I have to check.
ls1 4.250 stroke
See post no 8
Yes you need new sleves for that kind of stroke. Not on the stock block.
redtan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2012, 09:27 PM   #11
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Aguila, Arizona, USA
Posts: 93
Default

I'm running a 6L iron block with 4.125 x 4.125 bore and stroke for 442 cid. I have sleeved the block with 6 sleeves to maintain adequate cylinder wall thickness. I'm using a set of off the shelf Wiseco pistons and WCCH LS7 heads running 13.8 cr on E85 with EFI on a carb manifold. This engine is making over 700 fwhp. The iron block is required by the rules for the class I run (Comp Jet circle race boat). This is a very difficult environment for an engine as I must run for 5 miles wide open... This engine is very competitive against the best in the class, especially since the class allows 515 cid and I have to run against 509 cid BBC's tricked out the the max... And this is my small engine...

My big engine is a 492 cid LSX engine that has a 100 hp advantage over the competition. But that is another story...
MrE
__________________
Black Z06 clone, 433 L92 stroker road race car.
'01 C5 Vert, torch red (for the Wife).
'79 C3, 406 cid, Tremec 5spd, 132 mph on NOX
MrEracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2012, 06:08 AM   #12
Burnout Box
 
03_Denali's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 124
Default

You sleeved an iron block?
03_Denali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2012, 06:14 AM   #13
12 Second Club
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 49
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,142
Send a message via ICQ to bww3588 Send a message via Yahoo to bww3588
Default

What's wrong with that?
bww3588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2012, 06:53 AM   #14
TECH Resident
 
CAMSTER's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 10
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Miami gardens FL 33055
Posts: 835
Default

Why not a real LSX block for about $2200. brand new and you end up with a real lsx engine, and no oil consumption, with 4.185 bore and 4.00 stroke you have a 440 CI you can do anything you want with, and is rock steady. Oh and don't tell me about the extra weight, if you use all the tricks you are considering, to use the lq9, you may end up with a zero weight block LOL...
__________________
640 RWHP N/A through an auto
CAMSTER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2012, 07:17 AM   #15
TECH Junkie
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Watertown, MA
Posts: 3,055
Default

Quote:
You sleeved an iron block?
Nothing wrong with that, question is why sleeve only 6 of the 8 bores?
redtan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2012, 08:21 AM   #16
Staging Lane
 
Trader Rating: 3
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Aguila, Arizona, USA
Posts: 93
Default

Core shift leaves one cylinder on each side that has thick (enough) cylinder walls... Too bad GM did not siamese these blocks because they have plenty of cylinder wall thickness everywhere except between the cylinders.
MrE
__________________
Black Z06 clone, 433 L92 stroker road race car.
'01 C5 Vert, torch red (for the Wife).
'79 C3, 406 cid, Tremec 5spd, 132 mph on NOX
MrEracer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2012, 12:01 PM   #17
LS6
TECH Regular
 
LS6's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 0
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia - Jeddah / Yanbu Royal Commission
Posts: 476
Default

The cost of stoker kit with 4.125" stoke is the same cost as 4.25" stroke.
With the 4.125" stroke the engine will be 429ci
__________________
The dream of LS1 with 441ci
LS6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2012, 05:15 AM   #18
Burnout Box
 
03_Denali's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 1
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 124
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bww3588 View Post
What's wrong with that?
I have just never heard of sleeving an iron block.
03_Denali is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2012, 05:45 AM   #19
12 Second Club
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: 49
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,142
Send a message via ICQ to bww3588 Send a message via Yahoo to bww3588
Default

Fair enough.

Before aluminum blocks came around, sleeves were used for repairing cylinders. Back then, 350 Chevy's weren't by the thousands in junk yards like they are now. You couldn't just scrap the block and hit your neighbor up for one of the 40 he has in his back yard.
bww3588 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2012, 05:45 AM
LS1Tech
Pontiac Firebird




Paid Advertisement
Reply

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
My LS7 442 Build SHovV Generation IV Internal Engine 28 05-29-2015 04:25 PM
Differences between LS1/6 crank and LQ4/9 crank? badformulaLS1 Generation III Internal Engine 1 05-19-2015 06:12 PM
Looking for LQ9/LQ4 block jds99camaross Florida Members 1 11-02-2014 01:14 AM
72 Olds 442 build garys 68 Conversions & Hybrids 160 10-24-2013 01:42 PM
LQ4 Steel Head Dirt LM 365ci limit derricklong Generation III Internal Engine 8 08-06-2013 07:12 PM


Tags
4185, 433, 440, block, bore, boring, kit, lq4, lq9, lsx, max, sleeve, stoker, stroke, stroker


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Join Ls1Tech

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7 AC1
Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Advertising - Terms of Service - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - JOBS
Emails & Contact Details