Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

How agressive is this cam?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-20-2012, 07:27 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
USMC5811's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCB Quantico, VA
Posts: 537
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default How agressive is this cam?

Pat G just speced my cam for me for my 408 as a 235/242 .638/.613 Just wondering how agressive this cam is and what would be a compared cam on an LS1 such as a Torquer v3, MS3, MS4 etc.
Old 09-20-2012, 07:30 PM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Its not very aggresive, it would be like ummm maybe a 228r? 228/228 .588/588 114lsa
Old 09-20-2012, 09:33 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Blu99T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Are you wondering about the sound of it, like the chop? Provide us the LSA of the came and we can figure the overlap. It will give you an idea of the "chop".
Old 09-20-2012, 09:38 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
 
msydow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: houston, texas
Posts: 462
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have an MS4 in my 383 which is a 239/242 .649/.609 on a 111 or 112. It still really aggressive with the increased cubic inches. Circle D still speced out a 4000 RPM stall for it though.
Old 09-20-2012, 10:06 PM
  #5  
Launching!
 
c5z16z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 238
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by USMC5811
Pat G just speced my cam for me for my 408 as a 235/242 .638/.613 Just wondering how agressive this cam is and what would be a compared cam on an LS1 such as a Torquer v3, MS3, MS4 etc.
sounds like a nice cam depending what you wanted it for,, whats the LSA,, id be happy with that cam
Old 09-21-2012, 06:53 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
USMC5811's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCB Quantico, VA
Posts: 537
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

its a 112+3 LSA. found 2 youtube videos on it and it sound pretty lopey. just wondering what the power potential is on it....

and if it is equivelant of a 228R thats fine with me, i had that in my car before this build and loved it for my DD. and i didnt have to worry about changing out my valvesprings all the time
Old 09-21-2012, 08:34 AM
  #7  
TECH Enthusiast
 
ScottyBG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Bowling Green KY
Posts: 557
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Even on a 408 thats still a big stick, not a donkey D, but still really healthy. It really depends on the lobes used, what your valve spring life is going to be like though. Those same lift and druation numbers on lobes with really agressive ramp rates could be killer, or with mild lazy lobes could last quite a while. The maximum acceleration and jerk rates of the valve is the key factor in determining valve spring life.
Old 09-21-2012, 09:13 AM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by USMC5811
its a 112+3 LSA. found 2 youtube videos on it and it sound pretty lopey. just wondering what the power potential is on it....

and if it is equivelant of a 228R thats fine with me, i had that in my car before this build and loved it for my DD. and i didnt have to worry about changing out my valvesprings all the time
youre gonna be changing valve springs fairly often (about every 25-30k miles). Dont get me wrong, the cam is by no means small, but its not no TRex type deal.
Old 09-21-2012, 11:01 AM
  #9  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
USMC5811's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCB Quantico, VA
Posts: 537
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I belive they are EHI intake lobes and LXL exhaust but ill have to double check
Old 09-24-2012, 06:41 PM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
USMC5811's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCB Quantico, VA
Posts: 537
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

any other input?
Old 09-25-2012, 09:33 PM
  #11  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Blu99T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

14.5 degrees of overlap, should sound good. MS4 with an 112 LSA has 16.5 degrees of overlap for a comparison.
Old 09-26-2012, 11:59 AM
  #12  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
USMC5811's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCB Quantico, VA
Posts: 537
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

^^^ thats what i needed! thanks! how do you calculate the overlap.....
Old 09-26-2012, 06:22 PM
  #13  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
Blu99T/A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Florida
Posts: 642
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

(235+242)/4 (-112) *2 = 14.5

Let me know if you need anymore info.
Old 10-04-2012, 10:48 AM
  #14  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by USMC5811
I belive they are EHI intake lobes and LXL exhaust but ill have to double check
This is correct.

Hope you're not using stock rockers...
Old 10-04-2012, 11:26 AM
  #15  
TECH Senior Member
 
Jimbo1367's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 7,816
Received 583 Likes on 461 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Martin@Tick
This is correct.

Hope you're not using stock rockers...
why? lift or ramp rate?

thanks,
JIm
Old 10-04-2012, 03:34 PM
  #16  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Lift.
Old 10-05-2012, 08:59 AM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
USMC5811's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCB Quantico, VA
Posts: 537
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Trunion upgrade will work fine correct?
Old 10-05-2012, 04:20 PM
  #18  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Sales@Tick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Mount Airy, NC
Posts: 7,480
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

For sure! I always suggest the trunion upgrade if applicable to the combination.
Old 10-08-2012, 07:07 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
USMC5811's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: MCB Quantico, VA
Posts: 537
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

What about the comp ultra golds.... i have a friend selling his and i can get them locally and for the same price as the trunion....
Old 10-09-2012, 02:35 AM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
02sslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: longview, wa
Posts: 651
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

This cam is very simaler to the tsp tsunami. 235/240 .647/.608 111lsa. So it is not very aggressive for a 408



Quick Reply: How agressive is this cam?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:03 PM.