Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

Budget LS2: Torquer V2/PPI + unported L92 heads?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-12-2016, 03:03 AM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Masochist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Budget LS2: Torquer V2/PPI + unported L92 heads?

I've got an LS2(C6) with full bolt-ons and a TV2 cam in it right now making just over 430hp. I have my eyes on stock, unported L92 heads for under 600$ a head and I'm wondering if that head in it's stock form would be a good performer or what I should upgrade if not.

This is a daily driven car that rarely sees track use so I am okay with leaving some hp on the table(I know the TV2 is a bit small) in favor of maintaining or even increasing reliability. I would be willing to spend on common sense upgrades for the pair of heads just to ensure reliability.


Any input on whether or not this head in it's stock form is a good choice would be most welcome, thanks!
Old 07-12-2016, 03:19 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

Not worth it at all IMO
Old 07-12-2016, 03:22 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Masochist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by HCI2000SS
Not worth it at all IMO
Welcome to any suggestions but I am not really keen on swapping the cam out.
Old 07-12-2016, 03:36 AM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
HCI2000SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Howell & Fenton MI
Posts: 11,145
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

I think your best bet is getting your stock heads worked over. A good set of ported 243 heads is hard to beat for the money
Old 07-12-2016, 07:51 AM
  #5  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Masochist
Welcome to any suggestions but I am not really keen on swapping the cam out.
The cam really wouldn't be ideal on a set of L92 heads, so you probably wouldn't like it as a daily driver. A set of ported 243/799 heads or even an as cast aftermarket head would pair up with the TV2 cam a lot better IMO. Having the intake ported wouldn't be a bad idea either.
Old 07-12-2016, 08:53 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
 
NAVYBLUE210's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Coast of San Mateo County Between Pacifica & HMB
Posts: 1,815
Received 215 Likes on 128 Posts

Default

As suggested above porting your heads maybe finding a used FAST 92 and having It ported is the best plan for a daily driver keeping existing cam.
Pick up 30 minimum across the whole band and 50+ @ the peak.
Bonus the car will drive the same when not on it.
Old 07-12-2016, 11:13 AM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,743
Received 537 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

For 600 dollars you can almost send those heads to advanced inductions...
Old 07-13-2016, 01:45 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (20)
 
06blackGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: KC.
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It will work good. I had a 06 gto. . Tx. Speed trqr 2 cam. L92 heads untouched and untouched ls3 intake,injectors. Put down 461rwhp. I'll post dyno sheet tomorrow morning when I'm off work. Car was strong.
Old 07-13-2016, 07:42 AM
  #9  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Stock solid valve heads for $1200?

You can get brand new GMPP cnc heads with hollow stem valves for that kind of money.

Although if I were going to drop $1200 on new heads I'd rather just send the stock 243s to AI and let them do work.
Old 07-13-2016, 10:09 AM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (20)
 
06blackGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: KC.
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here you go. It would work with that setup.
Name:  mcracingdynotune1_zpsj864vorm.jpg
Views: 142
Size:  28.3 KB

it would be fine.
Old 07-13-2016, 10:43 AM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
 
Tuskyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 4,743
Received 537 Likes on 383 Posts
Default

Nice torque curve you have there
Old 07-13-2016, 11:17 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
 
MuhThugga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wilmington, De
Posts: 1,671
Received 228 Likes on 153 Posts

Default

I wouldn't recommend that cam with those heads, and at $600/head, that's a terrible deal for L92s.

If you don't want to change the camshaft, then I would put that $1200 towards a set of ported 243s.
Old 07-13-2016, 06:10 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
 
JimmyGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Virginia
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 06blackGTO
It will work good. I had a 06 gto. . Tx. Speed trqr 2 cam. L92 heads untouched and untouched ls3 intake,injectors. Put down 461rwhp. I'll post dyno sheet tomorrow morning when I'm off work. Car was strong.
I see in your description of your car you have your heads ported and milled, who did the head work?
Old 07-13-2016, 07:14 PM
  #14  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (20)
 
06blackGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: KC.
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JimmyGTO
I see in your description of your car you have your heads ported and milled, who did the head work?

Oh for my g8. I had them milled and exhaust ports only ported locally at a shop called nolands head service in kc. The dyno numbers were just taken about 2 weeks ago. She was heatsoaked with my heavy camaro 20s on. If she's cooled down on my drag setup I think she has 460rwhp in her. And thanks tuskyz28.. I sure miss the 6speed in that goat. Lol
Old 07-13-2016, 08:00 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
Mercier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Baton Rouge, LA
Posts: 2,384
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MuhThugga
I wouldn't recommend that cam with those heads, and at $600/head, that's a terrible deal for L92s.

If you don't want to change the camshaft, then I would put that $1200 towards a set of ported 243s.
Concur on the price. I recently sold a pair of very low mile eat-off-them clean LS3s with hollow valves and PSI 1511 springs for $600. Like $300/head.

I am surprised at how well the L92s did with the cam spec'd for cathedrals. Seems the common school of thought out here is square ports really need different camming. I traded the LS2 intake off the V last month straight up for a complete LS3 intake so $600 plus a trade and some misc. gaskets and fluids sounds like the cheap ticket to mid-4xx RWHP.

Ported 243s can do some amazing things as well though and might net you a little more bottom end.
Old 07-13-2016, 09:29 PM
  #16  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
Masochist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Utah
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

That GTO's dyno sheet looks great but I think I'm going to go the route of getting them sent out to AI. It does appear that you are going to want a specialized cam for the L92 heads, in line with what people have been saying. That said, working on my 243's seems to be the way to go because I really don't want to fool around with a cam swap if I can avoid it.

As far as working with AI I see they can take them up to 218 or 226. I would like to see 460+ rwhp combined with as much reliability as possible. I'm not sure if they're a sponsor here so I wont talk about pricing.

Any input on what would be a good value to swap/upgrade as they're getting ported once they're out would be appreciated.


Thanks everyone for the thoughts so far, definitely helping me to get a picture of what I intend to do to the car in the next month or two.
Old 07-14-2016, 02:06 PM
  #17  
TECH Fanatic
 
MuhThugga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wilmington, De
Posts: 1,671
Received 228 Likes on 153 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Mercier
Concur on the price. I recently sold a pair of very low mile eat-off-them clean LS3s with hollow valves and PSI 1511 springs for $600. Like $300/head.

I am surprised at how well the L92s did with the cam spec'd for cathedrals. Seems the common school of thought out here is square ports really need different camming. I traded the LS2 intake off the V last month straight up for a complete LS3 intake so $600 plus a trade and some misc. gaskets and fluids sounds like the cheap ticket to mid-4xx RWHP.

Ported 243s can do some amazing things as well though and might net you a little more bottom end.
The dyno sheet doesn't tell the whole story. The thing to pay attention to with the square ports is that camshaft's overlap when street manners come into play. The LS3 heads don't play well with overlap and low-RPM driving, and it will make the car very unpleasant to drive.
Old 07-14-2016, 06:22 PM
  #18  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (20)
 
06blackGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: KC.
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MuhThugga
The dyno sheet doesn't tell the whole story. The thing to pay attention to with the square ports is that camshaft's overlap when street manners come into play. The LS3 heads don't play well with overlap and low-RPM driving, and it will make the car very unpleasant to drive.

Hmmmm. Really? Could have fooled me then. Since it was my car and I drove it for over 1yr with that setup with no issues besides lifting the heads on nitrous. Drivability was smooth. Could lug it around at 1200rpms. But hey its your story.
Old 07-14-2016, 09:18 PM
  #19  
KCS
Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
KCS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 8,848
Received 307 Likes on 207 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 06blackGTO
Hmmmm. Really? Could have fooled me then. Since it was my car and I drove it for over 1yr with that setup with no issues besides lifting the heads on nitrous. Drivability was smooth. Could lug it around at 1200rpms. But hey its your story.
There are actually a lot of people that were unhappy with the way L92 style heads perform with a cam intended for a cathedral headed combo. You can have good driveability with a good tune, but many report the engine feels "soft" at low RPM.
Old 07-14-2016, 09:33 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (20)
 
06blackGTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: KC.
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by KCS
There are actually a lot of people that were unhappy with the way L92 style heads perform with a cam intended for a cathedral headed combo. You can have good driveability with a good tune, but many report the engine feels "soft" at low RPM.

I totally understand that. It's just that combo happened to work out very well in my gto. Of course it was a m6. Now in my g8 it might have felt like a turd down low. Especially with my stock stall.



Quick Reply: Budget LS2: Torquer V2/PPI + unported L92 heads?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:14 PM.