Dragaholic

iTrader: (180)

I was wondering if the N-Motion single roller LS2 timing set was capable and safe running in a 700+ HP engine or should I consider the double roller? I've been told that the double roller will work with some slight modifications. What do you think?

skipperbisket

iTrader: (4)

why not just run the roller master dual setup? its ~$90 and will perform flawlessly for what you are wanting to do.

Dragaholic

iTrader: (180)

I don't believe Rollmaster makes a timing set for LS2s. I'm building a L92 setup and requires a LS2 set.

skipperbisket

iTrader: (4)

the L92 heads don't require an LS2 timing setup. However I do believe an LS2 block does. So, if you are running an LS2 block then you are right an LS1 chain wont work.

See5

iTrader: (53)

I am running the N-Motion double and was amazed how loose it was, even new. Much more than a LS2 chain. Not to bash but I think the LS2 is better and it works with a split front cover where as the double doesn't.

santiago

iTrader: (28)

i will be running it on my new set up. i ran it on my old t-rex/ls6 head set up and had no probs.

99Fbody99

The set is made by JP Performance and it top notch.
I have a few 800rwhp running around on them with the stock Rolon chain.

I have however done a couple where I switched to the LS2 chain to tighen up the loosness as you described to get a cam tighter in spec.
You can, depending on which block you have opt for the new spring type chain tension .

Dave

Dragaholic

iTrader: (180)

I'm using the L92 block which requires the LS2 timing set. I just didn't know if I should have my engine builder go through the extra process of making modifications to fit the double roller. I already have the single roller N-Motion LS2 timing set and was just wondering if it would be ok in a 700+ FWHP engine.