Generation IV Internal Engine 2005-2014 LS2 | LS3 | LS7 | L92 | LS9

L92 Crank in LS2 Block, Budget Build?

Old 05-29-2008, 12:19 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mean 69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default L92 Crank in LS2 Block, Budget Build?

I have a brand new LS2 block that I am looking to pull together into a very budget friendly, street driven combination. I had originally intended to re-sleeve this block as a spare to another engine, but plans have changed and I am looking to build this up for a performance cruiser (69 Camaro convert). In addition to the block, I have a nice sheet metal intake for the LS3/L92 type heads that will be used also. The price of the L92 crank is very attractive, using this, with a set of forged pistions and modest set of aftermarket rods should handle anything I throw at this combo.

The question I have is for a rotating assembly. I have read repeatedly that the crank on the L92 engines is a cast unit, not a forged, but that's okay. The stroke is 3.622", and I have found an off-shelf piston solution from Mahle that will work with an aftermarket set of 6.125" rods, so using these and a set of used rods is also in the plan. So, the main question is if the L92 crank will support this configuration.

Will it fit into the LS2 block without any needs to modify either the crank or block? I know that the L92 has VVT, but will a stock style/LS2 timing chain setup work with it? Any issues with the reluctor wheel (58x is fine, I don't have a controller yet anyway)? Will a standard style accessory drive work with it? LS2 covers, etc? Oil pump?

Completely appreciate any direct experience and feedback, thanks in advance.
Mark
Old 05-29-2008, 12:53 PM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
95FbFormula's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Canton, OH
Posts: 1,148
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

It should fit as long as the snout isn't different. Why not just get a used ls2 crank? probably be cheaper then the L92 and is the same stroke and 58X wheel
Old 05-29-2008, 09:16 PM
  #3  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (11)
 
1966goat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 95FbFormula
It should fit as long as the snout isn't different. Why not just get a used ls2 crank? probably be cheaper then the L92 and is the same stroke and 58X wheel
I agree
Old 05-29-2008, 09:42 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
drain89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Right across the river from Huntington, WV
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I don't think there's really any difference in the LS1, LS6, LS2, LS3, L92, or L76 cranks besides reluctor wheels. They're all cast nodular iron. Some may have radiused journals but I doubt it. Correct me if I'm wrong. I'd love to know the difference if there is. The LS7 is a 4.00" Forged Steel one with a different snout.
Old 05-29-2008, 09:57 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
drain89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Right across the river from Huntington, WV
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The truck motors are a different story though. The 4.8's use shorter cranks and the 5.3's had differences in flange widths and 6.0 LQ4 and LQ9 cranks I wouldn't fool with because there are differences in balance.
Old 05-30-2008, 08:09 AM
  #6  
TECH Enthusiast
 
HSV-GTS-300's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 689
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by drain89
I don't think there's really any difference in the LS1, LS6, LS2, LS3, L92, or L76 cranks besides reluctor wheels. They're all cast nodular iron. Some may have radiused journals but I doubt it. Correct me if I'm wrong. I'd love to know the difference if there is.
LS1 and LS6 might be the same balance.
LS2 and L76 might be the same balance.
L92 and LS3 might be the same balance.
Old 05-30-2008, 12:47 PM
  #7  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Mean 69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks guys, I hadn't thought too much about using an LS2 crank, as I understood that they are a lot more expensive than the L92 units (they build a LOT more trucks than they do Corvettes). Couldn't find the part number for the LS2 unit, but I had looked in the past and recall it was about $600 new, which is too close to the price of a stroker that I hadn't given it any further thought. A take out might be a good idea unless I have to have it turned, not sure what the factory heat treat is, and of course, it's more money. That's why the L92 looked so attractive: new piece, cheap. SD lists a host of parts for the L92, such as a keyway, crank sprocket, bolt, etc on their website which implies to me that these are unique to the L92.

A full parts breakdown/exploded view would be SO helpful for these types of questions, but I haven't been able to find such info for either the LS2 or L92. There are some great part number lists on this forum, but it's not all-inclusive. Tough for a guy like me building his first Gen IV.

Thanks, maybe easiest to find a take-out LS2 crank from a stroker conversion. Got one handy?!

Mark
Old 05-30-2008, 03:36 PM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
drain89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Right across the river from Huntington, WV
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by HSV-GTS-300
LS1 and LS6 might be the same balance.
LS2 and L76 might be the same balance.
L92 and LS3 might be the same balance.
Good point.
I wonder if the cranks for each displacement are actually the same even though they have different casting numbers. It doesn't make sense to me for GM to make 2 different nodular cast iron cranks for the same displacement motors.
Old 05-30-2008, 11:48 PM
  #9  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
V8Rumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Rocky Mtn thin air & snow...
Posts: 1,237
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Cool

Originally Posted by Mean 69
The question I have is for a rotating assembly. I have read repeatedly that the crank on the L92 engines is a cast unit, not a forged, but that's okay.
No, actually the L92 crank is forged - according to this GM press release (the added emphasis is mine, not a part of the original)...

Some Gen IV Vortec engines use aluminum cylinder blocks, which offer reduced mass – an attribute that supports improved vehicle weight distribution and slightly improved fuel economy. The aluminum blocks are virtually identical to their iron counterparts, including a deep skirt design that incorporates cross-bolted main bearing caps and a structural oil pan. All engines, except the 6.2L L92, use a proven iron crankshaft design and highly durable reciprocating components. The high-performance 6.2L L92 uses a forged steel crankshaft.
I was about six inches off the ground when I read that - the L92 I bought is looking like a better deal every day...
Old 05-31-2008, 02:11 AM
  #10  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
 
drain89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Right across the river from Huntington, WV
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

That's old news. Unfortunately it's wrong. At the last moment GM changed their mind and production engines got cast iron cranks instead. Remember...the LS7 was supposed to get Forged pistons. Looks like the GM bean counters did some last minute cost cutting on the L92.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: L92 Crank in LS2 Block, Budget Build?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:35 AM.