L92 heads - LS3 intake with 228/232 cam in a LS2 GTO?
#1
L92 heads - LS3 intake with 228/232 cam in a LS2 GTO?
Can I get your thoughts on installing L92 heads with a ported LS3 intake on a stock LS2 short block with a StreetSweeper-HT cam? Cam specs are 228/232 .612/.600 111.
With stock heads, inktake, and my tune the car drives in rush hour traffic like it is stock, yet lopes real nice, and put 415/395 down on a dynojet. I'm replacing the heads because I was replacing the springs and found I'd almost dropped the #7 intake valve...and the valve stem is F'd. So...I've decided to do my next round of upgrades:
LS7 lifters
Yella Terra rockers
Heads - (ported 243's or the L92)
Ported Intake (was thinking of ported LS3 intake for the L92)
Ported throttle body
Thanks...and most important to me is to NOT lose all the driveability and midrange torque I have now.
Gerry
With stock heads, inktake, and my tune the car drives in rush hour traffic like it is stock, yet lopes real nice, and put 415/395 down on a dynojet. I'm replacing the heads because I was replacing the springs and found I'd almost dropped the #7 intake valve...and the valve stem is F'd. So...I've decided to do my next round of upgrades:
LS7 lifters
Yella Terra rockers
Heads - (ported 243's or the L92)
Ported Intake (was thinking of ported LS3 intake for the L92)
Ported throttle body
Thanks...and most important to me is to NOT lose all the driveability and midrange torque I have now.
Gerry
Last edited by ShoddyHog; 08-17-2008 at 07:02 AM.
#2
Banned
iTrader: (115)
We just speced a cam for this very same application, 05 gto. A 224/232 113 +2 is what we ground for our customer. Daily driver and didnt want to give up any low or mid range torque and hp. He has his chpice as well with a 224/224 or a 227/234, I honestly think 224 is the biggest you can go without sacrificing bottom end. Especialy with those big heads.
Would be good to see your results though. We offer custom ground Comp cams for $370 and I have that L92 grind in stock right now.
Would be good to see your results though. We offer custom ground Comp cams for $370 and I have that L92 grind in stock right now.
#3
We just speced a cam for this very same application, 05 gto. A 224/232 113 +2 is what we ground for our customer. Daily driver and didnt want to give up any low or mid range torque and hp. He has his chpice as well with a 224/224 or a 227/234, I honestly think 224 is the biggest you can go without sacrificing bottom end. Especialy with those big heads.
Would be good to see your results though. We offer custom ground Comp cams for $370 and I have that L92 grind in stock right now.
Would be good to see your results though. We offer custom ground Comp cams for $370 and I have that L92 grind in stock right now.
Gerry
#4
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
Sounds like the car is making pretty good power. You might consider the PRC LS2 cylinder head setup. You could have your heads ported, valve job & milled for $650, or go outright with the stage 1 or the stage 2.5 PRC LS6 heads. We're currently offering $100 off any PRC heads!!
http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=649&catid=20
or
http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=134&catid=40
http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=649&catid=20
or
http://www.texas-speed.com/shop/item...d=134&catid=40
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
#5
Well guys, it's all over but the crying. I gave up on finding the answer to whether this cam will work with the L92 heads, so I told myself, "Self, there ain't but one way to find out."
I've got a set of L92 heads on order from Texas Speed. I'm also getting a ported LS3 intake, and stage II ported tb from Cory, and also LS7 lifters, new lifter trays, and Yella Terra rockers.
Got the heads off today. Man...the GTO must be the easiest car I've ever worked on in my life. I'd hate to do all this crap in a F-Body. You guys have my sympathy
I hope to put her all back together next weekend.
Gerry
I've got a set of L92 heads on order from Texas Speed. I'm also getting a ported LS3 intake, and stage II ported tb from Cory, and also LS7 lifters, new lifter trays, and Yella Terra rockers.
Got the heads off today. Man...the GTO must be the easiest car I've ever worked on in my life. I'd hate to do all this crap in a F-Body. You guys have my sympathy
I hope to put her all back together next weekend.
Gerry
Trending Topics
#18
For the record...with the head snugged down and no head gasket installed, I started to rotate it around...felt what I thought was resistance, so I "started to stop" for lack of a better way to say it. Pulled the head off, and can see where it just peeked through the clay on the intake side.
Gerry
Gerry
#19
Banned
iTrader: (10)
For the record...with the head snugged down and no head gasket installed, I started to rotate it around...felt what I thought was resistance, so I "started to stop" for lack of a better way to say it. Pulled the head off, and can see where it just peeked through the clay on the intake side.
Gerry
Gerry
If you're not doing this set first, you are most likely either preloading the lifter, or holding the valve open slightly to start with. Either one will skew your results.
That cam, should not be too big for that application. Although it does depend on the ICL, and the type of lobe. But, all that being said, it shouldnt be too big. Trust me on this one.
OK, to elaborate, without the head gasket, and depending on the length of the pushrod, you may be hanging the valve open to begin with, effective subtracting however much its open, from your true PTV.
Additionally, the valve spring can slowly collapse the lifter, as you're turning the engine over by hand, collapsing it even more, if its not already bottomed out.
The bestest, most accurate way, is to use the head gasket (either one, its only a dif of a .001 or .002, dont both torquing) checker springs, and a checker pushrod, adjusted so there is ZERO PRELOAD AND ZERO LASH.
Once you've determined your PTV, the lifter preload has no impact on it, once you final assemble it.
HTH. If you need personal assistance call my shop, I'll be here for a while. Or leave a message and I'll get back to ya later today.
757-424-1740
Last edited by edcmat-l1; 08-30-2008 at 01:48 PM.
#20
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
OK, First off, you're probably checking it wrong. You need to use checker springs installed in place of the valve springs. Then, you need to use a checker pushrod and carefully adjust it until there is ZERO PRELOAD, AND ZERO LASH. THEN you check your PTV.
If you're not doing this set first, you are most likely either preloading the lifter, or holding the valve open slightly to start with. Either one will skew your results.
That cam, should not be too big for that application. Although it does depend on the ICL, and the type of lobe. But, all that being said, it shouldnt be too big. Trust me on this one.
If you're not doing this set first, you are most likely either preloading the lifter, or holding the valve open slightly to start with. Either one will skew your results.
That cam, should not be too big for that application. Although it does depend on the ICL, and the type of lobe. But, all that being said, it shouldnt be too big. Trust me on this one.