Generation V External Engine LT1 Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust | Ignition | Accessories
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

GEN V External Engine

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-30-2012, 01:28 PM
  #1  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
Thread Starter
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default GEN V External Engine

This section is to discuss external "bolt on" modifications to the new GEN V (LT1) engine
Old 10-30-2012, 01:55 PM
  #2  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

Yayy.
Old 10-30-2012, 07:40 PM
  #3  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (4)
 
zamora7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Eeerrrwhere south, tx
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Ive got lt's, cam, heads, intake, 300hp shot of the n2o, with a turbo and a supercharger all tuned by me. So much for impossible to tune.
Old 10-30-2012, 10:06 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Tainted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 8,425
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Hope its not a let down like the other lt1
Old 10-31-2012, 01:41 AM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

I wonder how long it will take FAST to have an Intake for it..let alone anyone to have Aftermarket parts.

The Cam might be a tad expensive for a few years..
Old 10-31-2012, 11:37 AM
  #6  
10 Second Club
 
Sail Hatan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,262
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

God my gen 3 ls1 is like ancient technology.
Old 10-31-2012, 01:35 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
-TheBandit-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Instagram @chevyhotrodder
Posts: 2,813
Received 79 Likes on 67 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by the_merv
The Cam might be a tad expensive for a few years..
Why? There's nothing super special about that cam. Grinding a triangular lobe to drive a pump isn't all that different from grinding a normal cam lobe and it's been done for diesel applications for eons.

I do wonder if higher flowing HP pumps to support additional HP will require either different lobe profiles or (gasp) dual lobes. I can imagine a valley cover that allows two HP pumps to run off the same lobe - now that could support some power!

Biggest challenge I think for the hotrodding community will be engine control & tuning. The other stuff is not that different from the traditional LSx.
Old 10-31-2012, 04:00 PM
  #8  
6600 rpm clutch dump of death Administrator
Thread Starter
 
J-Rod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 4,983
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

This seciton is for bolt ons, so the camshaft stuf really should go in internal. But, there are some concerns with it, epsecially as JL-Ws6 has pointed out with cam flex.

So, things like headers which are going to be an issue with the relocated exhaust ports.

For FAST to develop an intake, we proably need to see how good (or bad) the new intake is.

It looks to be a lot of new tooling in the aftermarket.
Old 10-31-2012, 09:14 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
trumperZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kennesaw, Ga
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

With the exception of "headers" and possible air filter,

my guess is that it will be a while before the after market catches up.
Old 11-01-2012, 03:00 AM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Wnts2Go10O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by trumperZ06
With the exception of "headers" and possible air filter,

my guess is that it will be a while before the after market catches up.
with how fast a LOT of stuff came out for the Coyote 5.0... theyll probably have stuff out before the first vette is sold to the "public"...lol
Old 11-01-2012, 04:12 AM
  #11  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Wnts2Go10O
with how fast a LOT of stuff came out for the Coyote 5.0... theyll probably have stuff out before the first vette is sold to the "public"...lol
Probabty bolt on's and such, but internal stuff will be a while. I bet the biggest amount of stuff won't come out until variants hit the camaro and trucks when people can actually afford to get their hands on one. I'd say, major internal upgrades are about 5 years out. Hell, we won't even see the first one in a vette on lots until this time next year, a year after that in the camaro, And probably another year before it hits trucks.

If I recall, it was almost 2000 before the first reasonably priced upgrades started hitting the market for the gen 3 engines. Before that, it was just the slp junk and overpriced GM counter upgrades.
Old 11-01-2012, 06:11 AM
  #12  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (9)
 
ChucksZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 976
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I believe the trucks will have the new engines sooner this time, actually about the same time as the corvettes.
Old 11-01-2012, 10:02 AM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (5)
 
redtan's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Belmont, MA
Posts: 3,764
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts

Default

with how fast a LOT of stuff came out for the Coyote 5.0... theyll probably have stuff out before the first vette is sold to the "public"...lol
Yeah like bww said this would be very well the case for bolt-ons. Internal stuff will take a while. I mean look how long it took for aftermarket LS3/rectangular port castings to come out. And even now there are relatively few choices out there compared to cathedral ones.

And that's with a relatively similar architecture from LS1/2/6 to LS3/7/9. This all new Gen 5 stuff will probably take even longer due to the DI aspect of it and how different the cam and heads really are compared to the Gen 3/4 stuff.
Old 11-01-2012, 10:13 AM
  #14  
TECH Resident
 
Somebody09's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 905
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Not sure how feasible it would have been, but I wish they could have added direct injection to the current LSx. Why couldn't it simply have been a head-swap?
Old 11-01-2012, 11:30 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
SSCamaro99_3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Ballwin, MO
Posts: 2,551
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Somebody09
Not sure how feasible it would have been, but I wish they could have added direct injection to the current LSx. Why couldn't it simply have been a head-swap?
The block is very similar. I bet the crank is not much different (other than being forged). Pistons have to be different in order for DI to work properly. The biggest departure is in the heads and cam.
Old 11-01-2012, 11:31 AM
  #16  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
-TheBandit-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Instagram @chevyhotrodder
Posts: 2,813
Received 79 Likes on 67 Posts

Default

Well they needed room for the fuel pump lobe at the back of the cam for one thing, but it's about time for a generational change to make sweeping improvements after what 15 years since the LS1 came out?
Old 11-01-2012, 12:15 PM
  #17  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

From the pic I saw it was an extra lobe on it..unless I looked at it wrong..
Old 11-02-2012, 12:03 AM
  #18  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redtan
Yeah like bww said this would be very well the case for bolt-ons. Internal stuff will take a while. I mean look how long it took for aftermarket LS3/rectangular port castings to come out. And even now there are relatively few choices out there compared to cathedral ones.

And that's with a relatively similar architecture from LS1/2/6 to LS3/7/9. This all new Gen 5 stuff will probably take even longer due to the DI aspect of it and how different the cam and heads really are compared to the Gen 3/4 stuff.
Well said.

I think the reason rectangle port stuff didn't take off as fast as far as the aftermarket is concerned is because the factory stuff is so good in stock form. There are only a very small percentage of people that actually need ported heads and other things.

In the case of the cathedral port stuff, it doesn't take much more than a medium sized cam to out run the capabilities of the stock heads and intake, even the ls6 intake can only breathe up to about 6200 before it starts to stall out.
Old 11-02-2012, 12:07 AM
  #19  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (49)
 
bww3588's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Chillicothe/Lima, Ohio
Posts: 8,139
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

I think cams are going to be the most difficult to figure out. It's a totally different head, requiring different flow characteristics, then you throw Di on top of that. Think about how long it took people to figure out that traditional ls1 split cams wouldn't work with ls3 style heads.
Old 11-02-2012, 02:40 AM
  #20  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (12)
 
Wnts2Go10O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 4,354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by bww3588
I think cams are going to be the most difficult to figure out. It's a totally different head, requiring different flow characteristics, then you throw Di on top of that. Think about how long it took people to figure out that traditional ls1 split cams wouldn't work with ls3 style heads.
it didnt take that long. also, R&D is radically different from what it was just 5 years ago


Quick Reply: GEN V External Engine



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:15 PM.