Suspension & Brakes Springs | Shocks | Handling | Rotors

Strut Tower Bar Connected To Engine OK?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-14-2008, 08:15 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Troux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Strut Tower Bar Connected To Engine OK?

I'm running a swap car with some very tight hood clearance. I am trying to come up with ways of fitting in a good strut bar, and the idea of attaching a bar between the head and the strut tower on each side of the engine bay intrigues me. I plan on running solid motor mounts, so would there be much more NVH transmitted to the chassis in addition to what those bring? Would the engine vibration affect the chassis movement?

Thanks.
Old 10-14-2008, 08:37 PM
  #2  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (41)
 
Sam Strano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Brookville, PA
Posts: 9,583
Received 131 Likes on 85 Posts

Default

Not a good idea. The engine in this car is not meant to be a stressed member, and even if it was, not in that direction. What the hell kind of engine or intake are you running anyway?
__________________
www.stranoparts.com --814-849-3450

18 SCCA National Championships in house, many more for our customers prove we know our stuff.Talk is cheap, results matter.

Check out our KONI prices, our Master Cylinder Brace, and new Xtracker Hub/wheel bearing upgrade kits!
Old 10-14-2008, 09:05 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
turbowhistle86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: middle of nowhere, IL
Posts: 1,083
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

yeah....I was gonna say, I'm no chassis engineer, but I don't think that's a good idea.
Old 10-14-2008, 09:52 PM
  #4  
TECH Regular
 
impaled's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: tampa
Posts: 443
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

bad idea. even with solid mounts you are going to have some lateral [rotational] torque from the engine.

plus the vibration could rattle the bolts (or various other things) loose.
Old 10-17-2008, 06:00 PM
  #5  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Troux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the input, guys. It's an FD RX-7 with an LS2. I'd like the option to upgrade to a taller intake in the future, though.
Old 10-18-2008, 01:04 AM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (19)
 
2002_Z28_Six_Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wash, DC
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I would think about something more like a motor plate. But its more for a race car.
Old 10-18-2008, 03:14 AM
  #7  
Banned
iTrader: (8)
 
ae13291's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: san fernando valley, california
Posts: 3,093
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

i have seen like 350z's put that kinda stuff on but theres is more like a shock not literally a solid bar, you will break something. sick swap btw
Old 10-18-2008, 10:35 AM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (25)
 
01CaMMMaro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Denton, Texas
Posts: 1,206
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

just take your hood off then you can fit it show off that sexy LS2
Old 10-20-2008, 02:03 PM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Troux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 2002_Z28_Six_Speed
I would think about something more like a motor plate. But its more for a race car.
Motor plates don't seem like they would add the same stiffness of a solid bar, even a flatter design.
Old 10-20-2008, 03:03 PM
  #10  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
z28bryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Wouldn't the cylinder head be a poor place to attach it to regardless? That way the heads would be resisting the engine rotation. Not sure if it would make any huge difference or not, but it just seems like a bad idea.
Old 10-20-2008, 03:32 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
BMR Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tampa,Florida
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Troux
Motor plates don't seem like they would add the same stiffness of a solid bar, even a flatter design.

Motor plates add more front end stiffening than you think. The plate running from the driver side to the passenger side is very strong in this position and adds greatly to front end stability from side loads because this is along the strength of the plate.

Last edited by BMR Tech; 10-20-2008 at 04:27 PM.
Old 10-20-2008, 03:33 PM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (9)
 
BMR Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tampa,Florida
Posts: 1,073
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z28bryan
Wouldn't the cylinder head be a poor place to attach it to regardless? That way the heads would be resisting the engine rotation. Not sure if it would make any huge difference or not, but it just seems like a bad idea.

Most all motor plates use one or more of the cylinder head accessory bolts as an attachment point.
Old 10-20-2008, 04:39 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (19)
 
2002_Z28_Six_Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wash, DC
Posts: 4,539
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Troux
Motor plates don't seem like they would add the same stiffness of a solid bar, even a flatter design.
I see what you are saying but they aren't a paper thin plate. Yes, a sheet that had bends in it would be stronger but most of the forces would be applied in the direction of the plate so you aren't seeing any bending action in the plate.

They make the car harder to work on though....
Old 10-20-2008, 09:21 PM
  #14  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
z28bryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BMR Tech
Most all motor plates use one or more of the cylinder head accessory bolts as an attachment point.
My bad.. I was talking specifically about the strut tower brace being attached to the cylinder heads. I didn't see the beginning discussion about motor plates.

I also have a stupid question. What are motor plates anyway?
Old 10-21-2008, 08:31 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Troux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

See here:
http://www.tpmotorsports.com/plumbing.jpg
It's the flat panel that runs on the face of the motor, and is connected on either side of the frame.

I don't see what the difference is going to be between a motor plate and the idea I had, since they are bth connected to the frame/body and heads.
Old 10-21-2008, 10:17 PM
  #16  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
z28bryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Troux
See here:
http://www.tpmotorsports.com/plumbing.jpg
It's the flat panel that runs on the face of the motor, and is connected on either side of the frame.

I don't see what the difference is going to be between a motor plate and the idea I had, since they are bth connected to the frame/body and heads.
There probably isn't, but in that case you connect the block too. If you only connected the STB to the heads, would that be different? I don't know.. just tossing the question out there
Old 10-23-2008, 11:46 PM
  #17  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
 
Troux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well by way of the engine mounts and subframe, the block is connected to the frame. Think of this as the bottom of the frame connected to the bottom of the engine. Connect the top of the engine (heads) to the top of the frame (strut towers), and you're basically boxing the engine in. Even with solid mounts, there is some pivoting allowed about the crank's axis. By connected the heads to the strut towers, you would completely eliminate the engine rotation relative to the car.

Still, I'm not sure why BMR recommended a motor plate over a strut bar going to the heads, especially since motor plates involve some welding or drilling in the body/frame.
Old 10-26-2008, 08:19 AM
  #18  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
leadfoot4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Webster, NY
Posts: 4,611
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by BMR Tech
Most all motor plates use one or more of the cylinder head accessory bolts as an attachment point.

Not necessarily, Lee. The motor plates that I'm familiar with, through a couple of oval track cars I was involved with, either mounted between the water pump and accessory holes on the front of the block, and/or the block/bellhousing in the rear of the engine. These plates then bolted to tabs which attached to the frame. Both cars, I should note, were fabricated steel chassied cars.
Old 10-26-2008, 09:33 AM
  #19  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (7)
 
z28bryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: MA
Posts: 3,934
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Troux
Well by way of the engine mounts and subframe, the block is connected to the frame. Think of this as the bottom of the frame connected to the bottom of the engine. Connect the top of the engine (heads) to the top of the frame (strut towers), and you're basically boxing the engine in. Even with solid mounts, there is some pivoting allowed about the crank's axis. By connected the heads to the strut towers, you would completely eliminate the engine rotation relative to the car.

Still, I'm not sure why BMR recommended a motor plate over a strut bar going to the heads, especially since motor plates involve some welding or drilling in the body/frame.
Wouldn't you need modification to fit the shock tower bar anyway?
Old 10-26-2008, 05:51 PM
  #20  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
 
leadfoot4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Webster, NY
Posts: 4,611
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by z28bryan
Wouldn't you need modification to fit the shock tower bar anyway?
Yeah, one would think so.


Quick Reply: Strut Tower Bar Connected To Engine OK?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:11 PM.