Cam Recommendation
11-15-2008, 10:09 PM
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Cam Recommendation Hello to all:
I'm new to this forum and would like to ask for recommendations for a cam for an LS2 Corvette. It's an A6 auto, stock converter, 2.56 rear,1 3/4" KooK's,
ported FAST 92, ported TB. What I am looking for is a slight lope at idle with a torque and HP increase. I have been considering the GM HOT cam, or an
LS7 cam. I also have a recommendation from Lunati for a new cam they just came out with: #60513 is 217/223 @ .050,.549"/.549", 113 LSA. Any suggestions would be appreciated, thanks.
I'm new to this forum and would like to ask for recommendations for a cam for an LS2 Corvette. It's an A6 auto, stock converter, 2.56 rear,1 3/4" KooK's,
ported FAST 92, ported TB. What I am looking for is a slight lope at idle with a torque and HP increase. I have been considering the GM HOT cam, or an
LS7 cam. I also have a recommendation from Lunati for a new cam they just came out with: #60513 is 217/223 @ .050,.549"/.549", 113 LSA. Any suggestions would be appreciated, thanks.
11-16-2008, 07:23 AM
#2
LS1Tech Sponsor
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Rockfield Kentucky
Posts: 1,170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The hot cam has a slightly larger split and a closer lobe sep. I do like the Lunati in your car because of the stock converter and gear. The LS2 Spring should work with that cam also. Lunati also has a 212/218 cam that has a little less lift. Your not going to see a huge difference between the two Lunati cams. But for a stock converter and gear I would lean toward the mild side.
I would stay away from the LS7 cam. It has too wide a lobe sep for my taste.
I run Lunati in my race car, very good guys!
Robin
I would stay away from the LS7 cam. It has too wide a lobe sep for my taste.
I run Lunati in my race car, very good guys!
Robin
11-16-2008, 08:02 AM
#3
The hot cam has a slightly larger split and a closer lobe sep. I do like the Lunati in your car because of the stock converter and gear. The LS2 Spring should work with that cam also. Lunati also has a 212/218 cam that has a little less lift. Your not going to see a huge difference between the two Lunati cams. But for a stock converter and gear I would lean toward the mild side.
I would stay away from the LS7 cam. It has too wide a lobe sep for my taste.
I run Lunati in my race car, very good guys!
Robin
I would stay away from the LS7 cam. It has too wide a lobe sep for my taste.
I run Lunati in my race car, very good guys!
Robin
11-16-2008, 08:37 AM
#4
10 Second Club
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Out There
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If you decide to go with a larger than stock stall i would go with the Cartek 3x cam.
We have similar setups and i went with there 3X cam annd got 441rwhp and 386 rwfts. Here is the graph.
Here is a video of the idle.
The car runs strong and i have consistently cut 11.1`s@124-125mph.
Here are the timeslips.
This cam is great on the street to, no bucking/serging. As for the exact specs, you would have to give them a call. But its in a range of mid 23x/23x 116lsa.
Hope this helped.
We have similar setups and i went with there 3X cam annd got 441rwhp and 386 rwfts. Here is the graph.
Here is a video of the idle.
The car runs strong and i have consistently cut 11.1`s@124-125mph.
Here are the timeslips.
This cam is great on the street to, no bucking/serging. As for the exact specs, you would have to give them a call. But its in a range of mid 23x/23x 116lsa.
Hope this helped.
