Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

question about strokers versus all bore

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-2003, 01:22 PM
  #1  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Excal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default question about strokers versus all bore

what's better? i see cars that are "all bore" and hear the term strokers alot..

what's the diff in milage, drivability, noise, hp gains Cost ect ect
Old 09-22-2003, 02:52 PM
  #2  
TECH Veteran
 
robertbartsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hartsdale, NY
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: question about strokers versus all bore

...Good question; from what i have read, the stroker has the advantage of putting more torque down low and avoiding any risk from dropped replacement bore sleeves...

..The all bore can rev higher/faster and gennerally can make a little more power given equal displacement....

The more interesting question seems to be the price...from what I gather the price of an all bore is a tad higher than a pure stroker, but some may quible with this....??



Old 09-22-2003, 03:07 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
kumar75150's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,112
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: question about strokers versus all bore

All bore will make more peak power but I wouldnt buy one without a 2 year+ warranty.

Price for a good all bore and all stroke is prolly about the same.

I have seen some all bores make just as much and sometimes more tq than an all stroke.

If reliability wasnt an issue, I would do an all bore.
Old 09-22-2003, 03:08 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
 
Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Troy, AL
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Re: question about strokers versus all bore

The only real disadvantage that an all-bore has compared to an all-stroke is the possibility of sleeve issues. There are companies now that have really gotten the process down pat from where it used to be but there is still that risk.

The thing I like most about the all-bore is that the larger bore allows for bigger valves without shrouding them. This helps flow and promotes power. You also have the advantage of being able to run a better rod/stroke ratio since you have a shorter stroke.
Old 09-22-2003, 10:49 PM
  #5  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Excal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: question about strokers versus all bore

umm the Agostino group, didn't they use an all bore in their 8-second T/A?

i remember they guy talking about no need to re-sleeve and the amount of miles the engine had.

would the stroker idle louder?

havea question about cube-increase....what would a stock Cube motor have on say a...382 or 422?

milage? reliability? also do big cubes mandate better octane?
Old 09-22-2003, 11:13 PM
  #6  
TECH Resident
 
blk~2000~Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Marysville, OH
Posts: 834
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: question about strokers versus all bore



havea question about cube-increase....what would a stock Cube motor have on say a...382 or 422?


I am a little confused.

I am not to sure if all bore is possible in an 8 sec. T/A w/o resleeve, seems impossible.
mileage and reliability generally rely on 2 things:
1. Manufacturer
2. Your right foot!!
Old 09-22-2003, 11:14 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
 
Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Troy, AL
Posts: 9,246
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default Re: question about strokers versus all bore

Agastino's 8 second car is bored AND stroked.

Stroker idle louder? Bigger cubes can make the idle tone a bit deeper but I wouldn't really say louder.

Big cubes do not mandate higher octane. That is mainly a function of dynamic compression ratio which is influenced by many variables, not the least of which is your static compression ratio. You could build a 460 CI LS1 that runs on 87 octane if you really wanted to.
Old 09-23-2003, 12:09 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
 
Excal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: PA
Posts: 698
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Re: question about strokers versus all bore

so there aren't negatives when increasing displacement?

emissions?

i'm pretty sure he said that the engine was not re-sleeved and said that their engines last.

Old 09-23-2003, 09:46 AM
  #9  
LS1Tech Co-Founder
iTrader: (38)
 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 32,987
Likes: 0
Received 45 Likes on 19 Posts

Default Re: question about strokers versus all bore

ARE used a resleeved factory block, and a forged stroker crankshaft. Like Colonel said, bored AND stroked. We used to call this setup a "super stroker" in the LS1 world, since a regular 382ci with just a crank is a stroker.

You get increased emissions with a stroker. Bigger engine, more exhaust per combustion cycle. My previous 382ci passed emission sniff tests just fine though (with a small T1 cam).

All-bores are generally cheaper than strokers. Until someone makes a cheap cast crank, expect that to remain unchanged. The forged stroker cranks cost over $2K by themselves most of the time.

Tony
Old 09-24-2003, 01:08 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
 
robertbartsch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Hartsdale, NY
Posts: 4,055
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: question about strokers versus all bore

SDPC sells a Callies forged 4" crank with a reluctor wheel for a mere $1,600; you can get a 4.125" for $200 more...

SDPC------------------------------------------->
Old 09-24-2003, 02:03 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (10)
 
Loudmouth LS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Deerfield Beach, FL
Posts: 3,672
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Re: question about strokers versus all bore

Yeah, I was lookin at that too, but I heard that the Callie's have a lot of problems, but I forget what they were, if someone could chime in that knows, i'd like to know what the problems are, and if they actually do have problems, thanks!




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:07 PM.