*NEWS* Trickflow Cylinder heads DO work with stock rocker arms
#3
LS1TECH & Trucks Sponsor
iTrader: (34)
Everyone always knew you COULD. I'll never recommend it, and most shops won't either. Bad geometry isn't acceptable, and it would not be responsible of a professional shop to recommend a setup like that especially since Trickflow recommends aftermarket rockers as well. AFRs have a stock valve angle, and so the geometry isn't thrown off as bad so stockers are much more acceptable on an AFR vs a Trickflow.
__________________
800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice
800-456-0211 / PM / Facebook
WHIPPLE Superchargers, Procharger, Magnuson, Powerbond Sale, HPTuners packages!, Trickflow, AFR, PRC, CHE Trunion upgrade, $100 7.400" pushrod set, Custom Cam of your choice
Last edited by Scoggin Dickey; 12-23-2008 at 03:41 PM.
#7
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (64)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Yes, but this also applies to every guy out there with a MS4 camshaft with a stock rocker on a cnc stock casting head/afr etc....its just as bad.
They did say they dont see a *problem* with stock rockers with a .560 or less cam but they still recommend a roller rocker on every application possible
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA, Bay Area
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Everyone always knew you COULD. I'll never recommend it, and most shops won't either. Bad geometry isn't acceptable, and it would not be responsible of a professional shop to recommend a setup like that especially since Trickflow recommends aftermarket rockers as well. AFRs have a stock valve angle, and so the geometry isn't thrown off as bad so stockers are much more acceptable on an AFR vs a Trickflow.
Also TFS probably doesn't want to deal people coming back with worn valve guides or any other premature wear from running stock rockers but claiming that they had rollers on the whole time. Trying to get TFS to flip the bill just because they cheaped out on their rockers.
#9
LSX Mechanic
iTrader: (89)
Everyone always knew you COULD. I'll never recommend it, and most shops won't either. Bad geometry isn't acceptable, and it would not be responsible of a professional shop to recommend a setup like that especially since Trickflow recommends aftermarket rockers as well. AFRs have a stock valve angle, and so the geometry isn't thrown off as bad so stockers are much more acceptable on an AFR vs a Trickflow.
Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. I say this time and time again on this board. Valvetrain geometry is very important, and it's the valve angle on the TFS stuff that requires the rockers.
For whomever is reading this, if you have beef with using a $400 rocker on a set of trick flows, you're better off buying an AFR or TEA LS6 head that can support a stock rocker.
#10
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
I don't know this for a fact but have "heard" TFS revised their design a bit and now require a slightly shorter pushrod than the earlier castings provided everything else being equal. And the change was made due to VG wear issues.... Let me repeat I "HEARD" this and have no idea if it is a fact so I don't want to spread bad/untrue info...
I know somebody out there like Ron@Vengeance who have seen a lot of sets of these heads could shed some light.... Can TFS chime in????
There is so much info/misinfo out there. I would love to know if the .550 lift info above is correct also I have never seen/heard this before.....
Maybe I should have Santa bring me some YT UL's for Christmas
I know somebody out there like Ron@Vengeance who have seen a lot of sets of these heads could shed some light.... Can TFS chime in????
There is so much info/misinfo out there. I would love to know if the .550 lift info above is correct also I have never seen/heard this before.....
Maybe I should have Santa bring me some YT UL's for Christmas
Last edited by SOMbitch; 12-23-2008 at 05:34 PM.
#11
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (24)
I don't know this for a fact but have "heard" TFS revised their design a bit and now require a slightly shorter pushrod than the earlier castings provided everything else being equal.
There is so much info/misinfo out there. I would love to know if the .550 lift info above is correct
Maybe I should have Santa bring me some YT UL's for Christmas
There is so much info/misinfo out there. I would love to know if the .550 lift info above is correct
Maybe I should have Santa bring me some YT UL's for Christmas
#12
FormerVendor
I've run several sets with stock rockers and they seem to be running great but the TFS stuff does have some pretty hoss little springs and I would much rather see the roller rockers as well in general especially with the higher spring pressure.
#13
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: CA, Bay Area
Posts: 625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know this for a fact but have "heard" TFS revised their design a bit and now require a slightly shorter pushrod than the earlier castings provided everything else being equal. And the change was made due to VG wear issues.... Let me repeat I "HEARD" this and have no idea if it is a fact so I don't want to spread bad/untrue info...
I know somebody out there like Ron@Vengeance who have seen a lot of sets of these heads could shed some light.... Can TFS chime in????
There is so much info/misinfo out there. I would love to know if the .550 lift info above is correct also I have never seen/heard this before.....
Maybe I should have Santa bring me some YT UL's for Christmas
I know somebody out there like Ron@Vengeance who have seen a lot of sets of these heads could shed some light.... Can TFS chime in????
There is so much info/misinfo out there. I would love to know if the .550 lift info above is correct also I have never seen/heard this before.....
Maybe I should have Santa bring me some YT UL's for Christmas
#14
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Smynings, GA
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Don't believe me, pull the heads and check them yourself.
This sounds like another attempt by you know who to "save the customer money."
Tell him to read up a little more next time he has a bright idea.
#15
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Smynings, GA
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bingo.
Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. I say this time and time again on this board. Valvetrain geometry is very important, and it's the valve angle on the TFS stuff that requires the rockers.
For whomever is reading this, if you have beef with using a $400 rocker on a set of trick flows, you're better off buying an AFR or TEA LS6 head that can support a stock rocker.
Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should. I say this time and time again on this board. Valvetrain geometry is very important, and it's the valve angle on the TFS stuff that requires the rockers.
For whomever is reading this, if you have beef with using a $400 rocker on a set of trick flows, you're better off buying an AFR or TEA LS6 head that can support a stock rocker.
Looks like one of the lesser quality shops in the ATL is selling TFS heads and installing the stock rockers... Failures are coming... but I'm sure they're blame it on bad gas or something wild.... Because we all know that the tune couldn't be the cause either....
What a shame...
#16
#18
FormerVendor
Thread Starter
iTrader: (64)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Bakersfield, CA
Posts: 1,074
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I actually didnt mean to post this as a "recommended" setup. I just posted the info that it is possible to use the stock rocker arm if needed. I wouldnt install them on thing myself either but if I had a set going on a stock motor with under .560 lift stock'ish, then i may consider it.
#19
FormerVendor
iTrader: (13)
There are 2 versions of the TFS heads:
The "early" geometry which used 7.700" long pushrods which was optimized for roller rockers and was pratically incompatible with stock rockers, these were only produced for about 6 months.
The "late" geometry which uses 7.500" long pushrods and is basically stock GM geometry rolled 1.5 degrees.
The geometry of the TFS heads is NOT what causes a problem with stock rockers and high lift cams, it is the bronze guides, this is why TFS recommends roller rockers.
ANY LS head, including stock GM heads, with bronze guides and stock rockers running around .600" lift or more WILL suffer valve guides wear. Every GM, AFR or Dart head we've taken apart that has bronze guides and used stock rockers and a high lift cam, suffered from valve guide wear. A person may not even know they have a problem, but the digital gauge doesn't lie. When these worn guides are checked they are oval at the top, worn in the direction of the rocker arm motion. They are also larger at the top than at the bottom.
Tony Mamo recently published that AFR heads will suffer from guide wear when used with stock rockers long term.
Stock GM heads have powdered metal guides and are extremely resistant to guide wear, even with high lift cams.
The TFS heads have a "Max pressure" spring installed the measures around 450 lbs open, this is to keep the valve train in check with the heavier roller rockers. If someone is going to use stock rockers they should change the springs to the Gold (360 lbs open) or the Extreme (400 lbs open). The increased spring pressure actually causes increased tip and guide wear when used with stock rockers!
The "early" geometry which used 7.700" long pushrods which was optimized for roller rockers and was pratically incompatible with stock rockers, these were only produced for about 6 months.
The "late" geometry which uses 7.500" long pushrods and is basically stock GM geometry rolled 1.5 degrees.
The geometry of the TFS heads is NOT what causes a problem with stock rockers and high lift cams, it is the bronze guides, this is why TFS recommends roller rockers.
ANY LS head, including stock GM heads, with bronze guides and stock rockers running around .600" lift or more WILL suffer valve guides wear. Every GM, AFR or Dart head we've taken apart that has bronze guides and used stock rockers and a high lift cam, suffered from valve guide wear. A person may not even know they have a problem, but the digital gauge doesn't lie. When these worn guides are checked they are oval at the top, worn in the direction of the rocker arm motion. They are also larger at the top than at the bottom.
Tony Mamo recently published that AFR heads will suffer from guide wear when used with stock rockers long term.
Stock GM heads have powdered metal guides and are extremely resistant to guide wear, even with high lift cams.
The TFS heads have a "Max pressure" spring installed the measures around 450 lbs open, this is to keep the valve train in check with the heavier roller rockers. If someone is going to use stock rockers they should change the springs to the Gold (360 lbs open) or the Extreme (400 lbs open). The increased spring pressure actually causes increased tip and guide wear when used with stock rockers!
#20
Teching In
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: somewhere else
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Bingo.
Looks like one of the lesser quality shops in the ATL is selling TFS heads and installing the stock rockers... Failures are coming... but I'm sure they're blame it on bad gas or something wild.... Because we all know that the tune couldn't be the cause either....
What a shame...
Looks like one of the lesser quality shops in the ATL is selling TFS heads and installing the stock rockers... Failures are coming... but I'm sure they're blame it on bad gas or something wild.... Because we all know that the tune couldn't be the cause either....
What a shame...
Anyone wanna hear about the time I bought a used Aeromotive pump and it didnt work about 4 years ago?