Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Turbo Suggestions

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-28-2008, 06:57 PM
  #1  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trnsfmr99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: All Over
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default Turbo Suggestions

I've been reading most of the threads concerning turbo's for LS-1's for the last 5 to 6 months. Well i'm about to purchase a turbo kit within the next month. Once I purchase this turbo kit, there will be no more upgrading, so I need yall's suggestions on which kit to purchase. I also checked out Turbotechnology's kits, but i'd rather hear yall's suggestions. I have a LS-6 motor(came from a 2002 Z06)with double-springs, in a 99 Camaro SS. I'm not looking to make my car a quarter mile runner. I'd like to have it for top-end enjoyment and retaining my air conditioner setup. As of right now, the car has 3.73 gear in a Moser 12-bolt, tranny built by T-56, Spec 3 Clutch. Now, if the bug bites me, i'd like to run it at the track for some fun, but that's about it. Which kit and setup would yall suggest? Thanks for the comments too!!!

Last edited by trnsfmr99; 12-28-2008 at 06:59 PM. Reason: More info
Old 12-28-2008, 07:28 PM
  #2  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (7)
 
ATLSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Smynings, GA
Posts: 559
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Give Josh at Kentucky Turbo a call...

He has a manifold kit that retains the A/C and will make great power.... 76mm should do just fine.

I would personally stay away from the rear mounts...

Good luck
Old 12-28-2008, 07:34 PM
  #3  
TECH Regular
 
Turbo 6.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Ever think about remote mount?
Old 12-28-2008, 11:18 PM
  #4  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trnsfmr99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: All Over
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thanks, anyone else have any other suggestions?
Old 12-28-2008, 11:32 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
elias_799's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: toronto ontario canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

don't go remote mount man, i personally don't like the whole idea of rear mounts and i have heard some bad things about them, the tti kit is pretty nice. good luck.
Old 12-29-2008, 12:00 AM
  #6  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trnsfmr99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: All Over
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thanks, elias799
Old 12-29-2008, 09:33 AM
  #7  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trnsfmr99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: All Over
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I've read some negative things about Kentucky Turbo. Not sure about them, unless someone else can give some feedback about them again.
Old 12-29-2008, 09:39 AM
  #8  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
52172's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Buellton Ca
Posts: 3,489
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Really I havn't heard anything negative about Kentucky performance are you sure your not mixing it up with Ohio Forced Induction which is a whole nother story. Yes you cannot go wrong with the TTI kit and their customer service. They have made a few nice changes to the log manifolds to help them flow a lot more. Good luck.
Old 12-29-2008, 10:30 AM
  #9  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trnsfmr99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: All Over
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Glad you mentioned them, Ohio Forced Inductions. That's the company, not Kentucky. Sorry about the mix-up. I'm sure everyone can understand, when we're spending 6 grand, you wanna spend it with caution. I don't have a problem paying that much, as long as the system works. Thanks

Last edited by trnsfmr99; 12-29-2008 at 11:03 AM. Reason: more info
Old 12-29-2008, 01:26 PM
  #10  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
elias_799's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: toronto ontario canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

aps kits are very nice but a little pricey, tti kit are good kits and reasonably priced and if you have the ls6 it means the you have slightly higher CR then ls1's so i would work on lowering it before you put the turbo on. lq9 heads will do the job for you. good luck
Old 12-29-2008, 02:54 PM
  #11  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trnsfmr99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: All Over
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just for my knowledge, aps kits are the front mounted kits and tti are rear mount, advise if that's correct. What is the "slightly higher CR"? LQ9 heads would help with the airflow, i understand that. You must excuse me, i'm one hell of a driver, but not familiar with the terminology yall use with the turbo stuff. Please advise.
Old 12-29-2008, 03:15 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
frcefed98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The turbo technology kit is a front mount, best to hit there website and look over their kits to see if either suits your needs.

KTYP was a great sponsor, but no longer sponsors the board....hope that changes soon..eeh Josh?

J
Old 12-29-2008, 03:25 PM
  #13  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
hawk584's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: earth
Posts: 1,749
Received 10 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

superchargers, turbo's, N02 & N/A, all are mechanical devices and all mechanical devices fail one way or another, it's the nature of the beast. rear mount, under the hood and APS all have their own pros and cons. you just have to weigh what pros and cons work best for you
Old 12-29-2008, 04:50 PM
  #14  
Banned
iTrader: (120)
 
Josh@KY-Turbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,199
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by frcefed98
The turbo technology kit is a front mount, best to hit there website and look over their kits to see if either suits your needs.

KTYP was a great sponsor, but no longer sponsors the board....hope that changes soon..eeh Josh?

J
Working on it. Just have to take care of some things before hand.
Old 12-29-2008, 06:09 PM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
elias_799's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: toronto ontario canada
Posts: 2,047
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

the lq9 heads flow a little better the the stock ls1 heads and they will lower the compression ratio. compression ratio is the room between the top of the piston and the combustion chamber. the higher the compression ratio the less room you have between the piston the the combustion chamber. for naturally aspirated engines high compression is the key to making power (and displacement and lots of other things) but for boosted application you need allot more room between the piston and the head because there will be allot more air going in then in a naturally aspirated engine. basically what you want to look for is 9.5:1 CR and lower for boosted application. but there are ways to run boost on a high compression engine, it is called meth. . you need that because some fuel starts it's combustion before the piston reaches it's full compression cycle and meth increase the octane number of the fuel that you are using witch prevents knock .

another way you can prevent knock is the shape and size of the combustion chamber


hope this helps you out . good luck
Old 12-29-2008, 09:45 PM
  #16  
Launching!
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
trnsfmr99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: All Over
Posts: 293
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

That was well said and i understand. It will help. Thanks alot. I'll keep yall informed how it goes with my setup.
Old 12-30-2008, 12:02 AM
  #17  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (77)
 
black98ws6ta's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: louisville,ky
Posts: 2,107
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Josh @ KYTP
Working on it. Just have to take care of some things before hand.
Must be nice to have your name still mentioned, even though you dont.
Old 12-30-2008, 11:09 AM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (34)
 
sevanseriesta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Gardner, KS
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Another Vote For KYTP... Some top notch kits for the right price.... But I am biased. I could not say enough good things about Josh.
Old 12-30-2008, 12:57 PM
  #19  
LS1TECH Sponsor
iTrader: (3)
 
DrTurbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

KYTP and Josh are class act.
Old 12-30-2008, 03:27 PM
  #20  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (16)
 
frcefed98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 6,907
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:16 AM.