LT4 vs Z28 Springs
#2
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (36)
What mods are done to your '93? The stock springs will only work with the stock cam and 1.5 ratio rockers. If you add 1.6 rr's, use LT4 springs at a minimum. If you go with a larger cam or larger rockers, get some quality springs like CC 918's or PAC 1218's.
#3
LT4 springs have a little more seat pressure and are rated to a little higher lift than the stock springs (z28 springs you are referring to).
What mods are done to your '93? The stock springs will only work with the stock cam and 1.5 ratio rockers. If you add 1.6 rr's, use LT4 springs at a minimum. If you go with a larger cam or larger rockers, get some quality springs like CC 918's or PAC 1218's.
What mods are done to your '93? The stock springs will only work with the stock cam and 1.5 ratio rockers. If you add 1.6 rr's, use LT4 springs at a minimum. If you go with a larger cam or larger rockers, get some quality springs like CC 918's or PAC 1218's.
These springs are .550 lift, more then the LT4 Springs. I think they came on the 70 LT1 motors if im not mistaken.
#5
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/HP-Z2...QQcmdZViewItem
Those are the springs that i have, and if they are crappy springs, then tell that to my 500hp sbc that daily drove me for 2 years.
Those are the springs that i have, and if they are crappy springs, then tell that to my 500hp sbc that daily drove me for 2 years.
#6
Haha yeah the original LT1 engine was back in 1970. They came the corvettes and a few split bumper z28s i believe. They were solid roller engines which is why they came with .550 lift springs, which was HUGE back then. The average cam was around .480 lift.
#7
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (36)
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/HP-Z2...QQcmdZViewItem
Those are the springs that i have, and if they are crappy springs, then tell that to my 500hp sbc that daily drove me for 2 years.
Those are the springs that i have, and if they are crappy springs, then tell that to my 500hp sbc that daily drove me for 2 years.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
the old z28 springs were rated for a 500 lift cam...
first gen Lt1 style
i would not call them crappy but i will say out dated technology.. there are much better springs out there and to top it off those springs were not designed for roller cams
first gen Lt1 style
i would not call them crappy but i will say out dated technology.. there are much better springs out there and to top it off those springs were not designed for roller cams
Last edited by 96lt1m6; 02-17-2009 at 01:02 PM.
#9
Trying to use them on my 93'.
Its got intake and catback now, but im doing cam, rr's the whole 9 yards. I wont be going over .550 lift because im using the LT4 hot cam (Freebie).
I just want to know if the LT1 heads will work with the Z28 springs. Size wise.
Its got intake and catback now, but im doing cam, rr's the whole 9 yards. I wont be going over .550 lift because im using the LT4 hot cam (Freebie).
I just want to know if the LT1 heads will work with the Z28 springs. Size wise.
#11
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (31)
yes,those were for the mechanical cam offered.
i still would not use them, the mechanical cam for those springs do not have the ramp speeds of a roller cam just for that reason i would opt for a newer style spring designed for roller applications.
too many times people say "springs rated for X lift " you really need the seat pressure and that really needs to be addressed. stock springs were 85 new,Lt4s are 100 and thats barely enough. 125-135 is really ideal
i still would not use them, the mechanical cam for those springs do not have the ramp speeds of a roller cam just for that reason i would opt for a newer style spring designed for roller applications.
too many times people say "springs rated for X lift " you really need the seat pressure and that really needs to be addressed. stock springs were 85 new,Lt4s are 100 and thats barely enough. 125-135 is really ideal
#13
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (36)
I would get these:
http://www.compperformancegroupstore..._Code=LTValves
Or these:
http://www.pacracing.com/Beehive_Spr...Set_of_16.html
http://www.compperformancegroupstore..._Code=LTValves
Or these:
http://www.pacracing.com/Beehive_Spr...Set_of_16.html
#14
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: S.W. Missouri
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
There are also these: Don't know if the duals will fit the LT1 head, but i'm looking at the single spring rated @ 125 seat @ 1.80 installed height, 360 open pressure.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/NEW-1...4099QQtcZphoto
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/SBC-C...4114QQtcZphoto
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/SBC-C...0494QQtcZphoto
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/NEW-1...4099QQtcZphoto
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/SBC-C...4114QQtcZphoto
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/SBC-C...0494QQtcZphoto
#15
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
I would get these:
http://www.compperformancegroupstore..._Code=LTValves
Or these:
http://www.pacracing.com/Beehive_Spr...Set_of_16.html
http://www.compperformancegroupstore..._Code=LTValves
Or these:
http://www.pacracing.com/Beehive_Spr...Set_of_16.html
#16
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
The original is actually written as LT-1, just like the original LS-6 which was a 454 Big Block in the 70s The new variations are not "Dash-number", so ours is actually just LT1 and the new LS is the LS6. I'm quite certain that GM did this to aid in differentiating between the old and new (GEN I and II). So if you have old, LT-1, 92+ is LT1
I'd stick with the LT4 springs for a roller motor, and also dual springs does not equal better. Single Beehives are pretty damn nice and I'd say are the most used in our motors.
I'd stick with the LT4 springs for a roller motor, and also dual springs does not equal better. Single Beehives are pretty damn nice and I'd say are the most used in our motors.
#17
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (1)
The original is actually written as LT-1, just like the original LS-6 which was a 454 Big Block in the 70s The new variations are not "Dash-number", so ours is actually just LT1 and the new LS is the LS6. I'm quite certain that GM did this to aid in differentiating between the old and new (GEN I and II). So if you have old, LT-1, 92+ is LT1