Which balancer for 7000-7500rpm
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (20)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: texas
Posts: 658
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Which balancer for 7000-7500rpm
Will the ASP pulley I allready have be ok? Or should I go out and get an ATI pulley? Or what about the summit version?
Last edited by dubrado; 02-21-2009 at 09:52 AM.
Trending Topics
#8
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grand haven ,MI
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
every one recomends the most expensive one availible.
but has anyone ever heard of one fail?
stock cranks are good for 1000 hp and i have never heard of a stock crank failure
just seems like a lot of money is wasted on stuff that don't make hp
engines will fail race engines and stock engines no mattter how much money spent will not stop the freak failing of a crank,rod or whole engine
I prob should not be posting this but i have seen a junk yard 6.2 with 19 psi on it make 825 rwhp and has been alive for 2 years
these are not 1970 chevy 350's remember when 6" rods where something to brag about these come with 6.098 from the factory
these ls engines can make 7-800 plus rwhp set up right in stock form
if you are going to spin 7500 then get the valve train as light as poss and dont worry about the short block
i have a what i figure to be a good top end set up set me back close to 5k'
but i dont care if you have a 50 dollar or a 500 dollar balancer it wont make more than a 1 hp diff in the end
and plenty of guys are spinning the stockers to 7400 so you tell me why
becasue i have a better chance of winning a million dollar lotto than my crank failing if i do not buy a 400 dollar balancer
lets get real. spend money where it makes power not to make a sweeter sig
but has anyone ever heard of one fail?
stock cranks are good for 1000 hp and i have never heard of a stock crank failure
just seems like a lot of money is wasted on stuff that don't make hp
engines will fail race engines and stock engines no mattter how much money spent will not stop the freak failing of a crank,rod or whole engine
I prob should not be posting this but i have seen a junk yard 6.2 with 19 psi on it make 825 rwhp and has been alive for 2 years
these are not 1970 chevy 350's remember when 6" rods where something to brag about these come with 6.098 from the factory
these ls engines can make 7-800 plus rwhp set up right in stock form
if you are going to spin 7500 then get the valve train as light as poss and dont worry about the short block
i have a what i figure to be a good top end set up set me back close to 5k'
but i dont care if you have a 50 dollar or a 500 dollar balancer it wont make more than a 1 hp diff in the end
and plenty of guys are spinning the stockers to 7400 so you tell me why
becasue i have a better chance of winning a million dollar lotto than my crank failing if i do not buy a 400 dollar balancer
lets get real. spend money where it makes power not to make a sweeter sig
Last edited by quick346; 02-21-2009 at 03:52 PM.
#10
11 Second Club
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Grand haven ,MI
Posts: 580
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah this year i will run my slp balencer on a stock crank through the traps at 76-7700 rpm's
i will let you know good or bad how it turns out.
but dont forget texis speed is turning 7400 through the traps on their stock bottem end car
i will let you know good or bad how it turns out.
but dont forget texis speed is turning 7400 through the traps on their stock bottem end car