Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Higher lift vs decking heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-01-2009, 12:21 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
philmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Higher lift vs decking heads

So here's the deal. I can't afford a good set of heads right now so I'm planning a cam /spring/pushrod/lifter/oilpump/timing set change on my ls1. I do not want to flycut. I dont want to kill the gas mileage ,drivability and low end so i'm planning a cam in the 224 to 230 duration range .
So here's my question . Which would give me more power. A lower lift cam and decking the stock heads or a higher lift cam. Should I get a max lift cam (eg new lsr 227/235 .614/.621 ) or an xer 580ish lift cam and deck the heads .030-.040 to bump the compression.
Any opinions appreciated.
Here's a short video of the locost the motor is currently installed in firing up.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sw3cShWejS8
Old 03-01-2009, 10:04 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (31)
 
sroach20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: houston, Texas
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

why not a high lift cam and some 5.3 heads. the 5.3s can be found for cheap and you could sell your stockers.
Old 03-01-2009, 10:30 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
5.3LJimmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Napoleonville, LA
Posts: 2,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

It's not the lift that affects the piston to valve clearance, it's the duration. The piston is not at top dead center when the valves are at max lift. The valves will be just starting to open or almost closed when the piston is closest, and how close is determined by the duration and lobe separation. Personally I wouldn't go thru the trouble or expense(new head bolts and gaskets) of pulling the heads just to mill them if you are gonna run a cam in the 224-230 range.
Old 03-01-2009, 10:47 PM
  #4  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (31)
 
sroach20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: houston, Texas
Posts: 2,318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lift, lsa, and duration all play a roll.
Old 03-01-2009, 10:58 PM
  #5  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (14)
 
Texas 02 Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yup, I wonder how much milling the 241s will cost vs. buying used 5.3 heads and selling your 241s.



Oh and your video link doesn't work.
Old 03-02-2009, 06:50 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
philmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

here is the fixed link.Thanks for the opinions. I understand that with a cam like "El Torro" PTV starts to get tight and I dont think you could mill the heads with that cam. So I guess what I am asking is Instead of running a huge lift lobe and having the coresponding increase in Valve train costs by having to run the best valvesprings wouldn't it be easier to run a slightly smaller lift , less expensive springs and just bump the compression a bit .
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9eyTfN0StCs
phil

Last edited by philmrx8; 03-02-2009 at 07:01 PM.




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:48 AM.