View Poll Results: Best Manifold for N/A motor?
LS7 style Manifold by Performance induction with accufab 4500tb
10
71.43%
LS1 8 Throttle Body Manifold (from Harrop)
4
28.57%
other (explain why)
0
0%
Voters: 14. You may not vote on this poll
Performance Induction Vs. Harrop ITB,for N/A??
03-28-2009, 09:01 PM
#1
9 Second Club
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 259
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Carb. Style Vs. ITB,for N/A?? i'm still confused between these 2 intakes,,,if i'd go with the LS7 style manifold by Performance Induction i'll go with accufab 4500 (4B-4500POL)
and that is for N/A setup..right now i have GMPP LS7 intake..
and if you have better choices please post it here, the car has a solid roller LS7
thax in advance
and that is for N/A setup..right now i have GMPP LS7 intake..
and if you have better choices please post it here, the car has a solid roller LS7
thax in advance
Last edited by TNTaddict; 03-29-2009 at 07:03 PM.
07-04-2009, 08:17 PM
#6
Harrop will CRUSH any carb style set up there is.....BY FAR. Its been proven what the Harrops can do. They are also very easy to tune. Amazingly smooth idles too. Like 454ci's with 600 rpm idles with huge cams in the 260's.
Oh, they also look great.......
No brainer.
With the killer heads we have out today, the intakes are the weak links. Even the best $5,000 sheet metal Wilsons and Becks get totally crushed by the Harrop and other ITB's. Harrop is cheaper too.
.
Oh, they also look great.......
No brainer.
With the killer heads we have out today, the intakes are the weak links. Even the best $5,000 sheet metal Wilsons and Becks get totally crushed by the Harrop and other ITB's. Harrop is cheaper too.
.
