Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

how do these cam specs look?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2009, 02:53 PM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default how do these cam specs look?

224/230
in. .567
ex. .578
on a 114lsa

It would be going in my stock lq4 with a s88 on it. My buddy bought it off a member on here who had it ground for boost/nitrous and can get the cam for next to nothing. I plan on building the motor next year or so and getting a custom ground cam for it but how do these specs look to run now?
Old 04-07-2009, 10:29 AM
  #2  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
1320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: LV NV
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Id run it and be happy.

Looks good for what its meant for.
Old 04-07-2009, 10:38 AM
  #3  
Customizing Director
iTrader: (12)
 
MadIceV8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SW Chicago, IL
Posts: 5,778
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Yep its meant for a Blower/nitrous. But should still run good N/A as I've seen quite a few people run similar cams.
Old 04-07-2009, 10:45 AM
  #4  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
1320's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: LV NV
Posts: 1,114
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

A few years ago, I ran a comp cam, n a consistent bracket car. I swapped to the same grind numbers in their nitrous cam......and the car was faster with the nitrous cam even NA........obviously doesnt always work out that way, but it was an interesting experiment, esspecially since they were very very very close to teh same grind numbers.
Old 04-07-2009, 11:24 AM
  #5  
Grr
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Grr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fargo ND
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

to me that looks perfect
Old 04-07-2009, 08:36 PM
  #6  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

sweet! I figured so just wanted a 3rd party answer!
Old 04-08-2009, 10:16 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

2 more things....

---thoes specs are for 1.7 rockers.. what is it with my 1.8's?

---its ground on a 114+2.. what does the +2 mean? And should i install it straight up like normal or advance/retard it 2deg?
Old 04-08-2009, 10:21 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
xpndbl3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: orland park, IL
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

install it straight up with a degree wheel. +2 is advance built into the lobes. follow the cam card to install it to the proper specs.

take lift number and divide by 1.7 then multiply by 1.8 to get new lift numbers for 1.8 rockers

PS then grab a lane when it's done
Old 04-08-2009, 10:26 PM
  #9  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

cool...

anytime heads up
Old 04-08-2009, 10:32 PM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

if my math is right the new specs are............

in.237 / ex.243
in.600 / ex.612

if my reading is right, a FI cam is kinda on the same level as a NA cam.. bigger=more converter, correct? So with this cam now being somewhat big, my 3800 converter shouldnt be soooo bad im assuming?
Old 04-08-2009, 10:34 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
xpndbl3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: orland park, IL
Posts: 1,568
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

converter should be picked to have good slip % on the big end along with spooling the turbos at the line on the transbrake.

haha to the headsup part. yup your 88mm monster against my motor car.
Old 04-14-2009, 12:16 AM
  #12  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (7)
 
lt1camaroman93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by xpndbl3
converter should be picked to have good slip % on the big end along with spooling the turbos at the line on the transbrake.

haha to the headsup part. yup your 88mm monster against my motor car.

You should NOT spool the turbo while on the brake, that bitch should be spooled before you are on the brake. You will slaughter that trans if on the brake that long, just an fyi. Put some dual rear calipers on the car to help with this.
Old 04-14-2009, 06:29 AM
  #13  
Dumb Ass Vette Moderator
iTrader: (20)
 
ls1290's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 4,279
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Taubr Unit
if my math is right the new specs are............

in.237 / ex.243
in.600 / ex.612
Incorrect. Rocker arm ratio really only affects lift, not duration. The specs with the rocker arms would be 224/230//600/612//114+2. On FI applications there is no reason to have advance or retard ground into the cam. The +2 will not hurt, but it is not needed. You really need to match the converter to the cams duration as the duration will define where the power will be made in the RPM band. Since the rocker arms do not affect duration, there is no need to change the converter. If you are looking to help spool the turbo, a transbrake would be more effective than a high stall converter.
Old 04-14-2009, 06:54 AM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

i do have a transbrake but plan on a 2 step also. ill figure that out later though.
Old 04-14-2009, 12:14 PM
  #15  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (490)
 
one fast zo6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 791
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

well to me that camshaft is way wrong for a turbo setup, to much exhaust duration.
Old 04-14-2009, 12:27 PM
  #16  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

well its already in my motor ready to go so only time will tell.
Old 04-14-2009, 12:31 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (490)
 
one fast zo6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 791
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

any turbo car will make great power!!! the camshaft is a little off, good luck with it.
Old 04-14-2009, 01:30 PM
  #18  
Grr
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
Grr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Fargo ND
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

hes running a very good exhaust side, that cam is perfect. If he was running a little 67 or t70 then yes, it has a bit much ex duration, but that is not the case
Old 04-14-2009, 02:22 PM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (32)
 
Taubr Unit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Chicago
Posts: 4,146
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

FWIW i bought a kit from Josh@kentuckyturbo with a single s88



Quick Reply: how do these cam specs look?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:25 PM.