Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

non shaft rockers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-07-2009, 11:28 PM
  #1  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
BackinBlack02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default non shaft rockers

I am in the process of building an LS combo for a class that does not allow shaft type rocker arms. I'm just looking to explore all of the options out there as far as who manufacturers non shaft aluminum rocker arms for the LS engine, both adjustable and non adjustable. I will be using stock LS6 heads for the class. So far I am aware of Comp ultra-gold rockers and Scorpion rockers. If anyone knows anything else available please feel free to chime in.
Old 04-08-2009, 05:16 AM
  #2  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

Not sure what you mean by non-shaft rockers. Are stock considered a shaft rocker? Reason for asking is the Scorpions install similarly to stock. Scorpion has also had some strength issues so proceed with caution with them. Crane made a stud rocker, not sure of Crane's status as a company but you can still get the rocker sets. If the Scorpions will fit in your class, then will Yella Terra?
Old 04-08-2009, 11:00 AM
  #3  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
BackinBlack02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The stock pedestal style rockers are allowed. By shaft rockers, I mean no shaft directly connecting one rocker to another, such as Jesel, T&D, etc. Yella Terra rockers would be considered shaft rockers, so no go. Crane is dead now unfortunately. What problems did the scorpions have? I've seen the off brand and "ebay" rockers out there, but there is no way in hell I would even consider them on an engine like this.
Old 04-08-2009, 11:21 AM
  #4  
10 Second Club
 
Gary Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Berkeley, California
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The stock rockers are very good if you will be using hydraulic lifters.
Old 04-08-2009, 11:58 AM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
vettenuts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Little Rhody
Posts: 8,092
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts

Default

The Scorpions were having problems with the pushrod cup failing. They were supposed to redesign them but I am not sure of the status and would be afraid to be a test platform for the new design. I would stick with stock rockers in your situation.
Old 04-08-2009, 12:09 PM
  #6  
OWN3D BY MY PROF!
iTrader: (176)
 
Beaflag VonRathburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Jax Beach, Florida
Posts: 9,149
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Gary Z
The stock rockers are very good if you will be using hydraulic lifters.
+1, You could always have them sent to harland sharp for their modifications. The stock rockers are really light too.
Old 04-08-2009, 03:03 PM
  #7  
TECH Resident
Thread Starter
iTrader: (7)
 
BackinBlack02SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 879
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I knew the stock rockers "rock" would come up, lol. I'm not bracket racing or building a hot street setup here guys. This is going to be an 8000+ RPM heads up motor. It's just ignorant to use stock rockers when the rules allow aftermarket, lightweight, full roller versions.
Old 04-08-2009, 08:13 PM
  #8  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (69)
 
Randy WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Baxter,KY.
Posts: 2,755
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

I run the Comp Pro Mags. very nice rocker arms




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:16 PM.