LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

top speed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-22-2009, 10:04 PM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
F3RR3T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: central fl
Posts: 304
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default top speed

i thought are cars topped out at 115-137?

i decided to do my first WOT run down a local stretch of 2 lane out in BFE and topped at 148
Old 04-22-2009, 10:11 PM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
xx_ED_xx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

6 speed cars it is a little easier
Old 04-22-2009, 10:14 PM
  #3  
9 Second Club
 
ARCTIC '00's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Lake Tahoe, CA
Posts: 160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by F3RR3T
i thought are cars topped out at 115-137?

i decided to do my first WOT run down a local stretch of 2 lane out in BFE and topped at 148
Are you speaking of LT1 F-body? They can do much better than 115! More like closer to 160 for an M6 car.
Old 04-22-2009, 10:17 PM
  #4  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Topped out as in? Electronically governed or ran out of power to go faster? All of my copies of the original tune are showing no governed speed, and the 90-92 TPI stock tune I loaded shows 125mph, so the program is working right. Anyways, my friend has gone over 140 in his 94 Vette which is all stock except no cats. I've gone 130+ in my 91 Formula with a 350 TPI and 144K on the clock. SO That basically takes care of both possible questions lol
Old 04-22-2009, 11:11 PM
  #5  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (108)
 
za355tx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dfw
Posts: 969
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

These cars stock were supposed to be capable to hit around 155mph.
Old 04-22-2009, 11:20 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
My95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 475
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Rated at 155 from the factory as long as they had the Z rated tire option that removed the 115mph speed limiter. That doesn't mean they won't do more than 155 though
Old 04-22-2009, 11:21 PM
  #7  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Z-RATED94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Carol Stream Il.
Posts: 1,524
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by za355tx
These cars stock were supposed to be capable to hit around 155mph.
This is what I read in three different Mags back around 94. All tests (give or take) where within one mph of the 155.
Old 04-22-2009, 11:24 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
daves94formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

my firebird pulled around 180 with the mods listed in the sig on the old 350. probly a bad idea spinning a stock bottom end to 6700 because the connecting rod bearings failed like 2 days later. for the haters out there that say this isnt possible you do the math. http://golenengineservice.com/calc/calcmph.htm
6700rpm (indicated on factory tach), 25.7" tire, 2.73 rear, 1:1 trans (i was in 3rd)
Old 04-22-2009, 11:38 PM
  #9  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (20)
 
hitmanws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 4,043
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

ive done 155 before in my bird. this was before all the mods
Old 04-23-2009, 12:01 AM
  #10  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (20)
 
94Z28-MSTGKLR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lacey, WA
Posts: 1,434
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I've done just a hair over 160 racing a friend in his 06 GTO. The only thing I had at that time was my SLP LM1, and about 3 miles of straight road, lol.
Old 04-23-2009, 12:07 AM
  #11  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by daves94formula
my firebird pulled around 180 with the mods listed in the sig on the old 350. probly a bad idea spinning a stock bottom end to 6700 because the connecting rod bearings failed like 2 days later. for the haters out there that say this isnt possible you do the math. http://golenengineservice.com/calc/calcmph.htm
6700rpm (indicated on factory tach), 25.7" tire, 2.73 rear, 1:1 trans (i was in 3rd)

Factory tachs are usually wrong.
Old 04-23-2009, 06:32 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
iTrader: (3)
 
daves94formula's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Ames, IA
Posts: 177
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gregrob
Factory tachs are usually wrong.
which is why i said indicated on FACTORY TACH
Old 04-23-2009, 06:37 AM
  #13  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Formula350's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Decatur, TN (N-W of Athens)
Posts: 7,564
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gregrob
Factory tachs are usually wrong.
Unless you're talking about the signal being off, and not the tach motor, mine is dead on with what my computer is reading
Old 04-23-2009, 08:12 AM
  #14  
Launching!
 
ALEXZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

trust me it will do over 140 lol i did 150 with 410 gears in 6th gear
Old 04-23-2009, 10:05 AM
  #15  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
djjab57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

man this has been gone over before, 94 Z A4 bone stock, 2:73"s 164 mph. i have a GPS if you are wondering how i know
Old 04-23-2009, 10:48 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
lt1noob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,443
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

got about 146 w/ stock governer out of mine, might be a little fasterthan that but i dont think my speedo is EXACT. was definately 140+...
Old 04-23-2009, 11:50 AM
  #17  
Launching!
iTrader: (6)
 
brickonwheels's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've taken it past where the speedo would read and decided that I probably didn't need to go much faster. But I would like to see what it would do. My suspension setup makes the car feel really unstable at speed, though.
Old 04-23-2009, 12:01 PM
  #18  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
djjab57's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

since the 164 ive added mods in sig., so this weekend i think ill go for another shot at it...if it dont rain
Old 04-23-2009, 12:56 PM
  #19  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

No, your car is not a freak.

No, we are not impressed.
Old 04-23-2009, 01:35 PM
  #20  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (3)
 
z_speedfreak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: limbo
Posts: 2,124
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by gregrob
Factory tachs are usually wrong.
x2 I brought mine to 5700 in 5th which according to the math is 173 so I usually say its good for 160+ when people ask.


Quick Reply: top speed



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:48 AM.