LT1-LT4 Modifications 1993-97 Gen II Small Block V8

Rod Bolts and Head Bolts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2009, 02:05 PM
  #1  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default Rod Bolts and Head Bolts

These good?

Rod Bolts
http://www.jegs.com/i/ARP/070/134-6003/10002/-1

Head Bolts
http://www.jegs.com/i/ARP/070/134-3601/10002/-1
Old 05-10-2009, 03:52 PM
  #2  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
95 TA - The Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

For PM (powdered metal) LT1 rods (stock on all 95-97 and some 94s, but no 93s or half 94s), use ARP specific 134-6005 rod bolts, even though people can and do use the 134-6003 that you posted. If you have GM pink rods (used in all 93s and most of the 94s) then use teh 134-6003 bolts you posted.

The way you can tell if you have pink rods or PM rods is that the pink rods have a flattened 'weight' area on the top of the rod cap. If the top of the rod caps are smooth with no machined flat rectangular weight than you have PM rods.

The head bolts you posted are the correct ones for a LT1. You can also get them in a half-stainless half-black oxide kit that has all the external block bolts in stainless.
Old 05-10-2009, 04:10 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Thank you!
Old 05-10-2009, 04:48 PM
  #4  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 95 TA - The Beast
For PM (powdered metal) The way you can tell if you have pink rods or PM rods is that the pink rods have a flattened 'weight' area on the top of the rod cap. If the top of the rod caps are smooth with no machined flat rectangular weight than you have PM rods.
.
So I just got home and checked my rods in the 355 and they have a boxed type end in the piston, not smooth.
So this means I have the pink rods? Wich are much stronger if I remember correcty? !!!!!
Old 05-10-2009, 04:50 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (17)
 
xx_ED_xx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yeah the powdered metal ones were supposed to be better but seems like everyone I know that races these in stock classes says the only thing they ever wore out besides optis was rod caps
Old 05-10-2009, 04:54 PM
  #6  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
95 TA - The Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Powedered metal rods are by far stronger than Pink rods. They will actually deform vs breaking at thier limit, which is HIGHER than the pink rods.

And, yes, I have run itno that situation as well, so it is first hand experience.
Old 05-10-2009, 05:06 PM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (17)
 
AChotrod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chicago area
Posts: 9,896
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

so i got the weak rods? Or more like brittle rods?
Old 05-10-2009, 05:09 PM
  #8  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
95 TA - The Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
so i got the weak rods? Or more like brittle rods?
Slightly weaker and yes, more likely to actually break at the limit vs deform.
Old 05-10-2009, 07:08 PM
  #9  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
96capricemgr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 11,975
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts

Default

When getting machine work done ask the machinist what he wants.

If you choose the rod bolts and then there is a rod bearing problem he will blame your parts. Let him choose and he has to be a little more objective IF there is a problem.
Old 05-10-2009, 07:26 PM
  #10  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
95 TA - The Beast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 412
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 96capricemgr
When getting machine work done ask the machinist what he wants.

If you choose the rod bolts and then there is a rod bearing problem he will blame your parts. Let him choose and he has to be a little more objective IF there is a problem.
And a lot of times a machinist will not know about a LT1 specific application part unless it is brought to thier attention.

If it is an ARP bolt, and comes in an ARP package and is installed by the machinist and fails he knows he needs to bring the issue up with ARP. For him to blame an application specific part means you should never use the guy as your machinist in the first place.

ARP came out with the 6005 rod bolts so that they didn't have the problem of 'eating' at the cap-side of a PM rod the way the 6003 bolts tend to do after repeated disassembly/assembly.
Old 05-10-2009, 07:44 PM
  #11  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 95 TA - The Beast
And a lot of times a machinist will not know about a LT1 specific application part unless it is brought to thier attention.

If it is an ARP bolt, and comes in an ARP package and is installed by the machinist and fails he knows he needs to bring the issue up with ARP. For him to blame an application specific part means you should never use the guy as your machinist in the first place.

ARP came out with the 6005 rod bolts so that they didn't have the problem of 'eating' at the cap-side of a PM rod the way the 6003 bolts tend to do after repeated disassembly/assembly.
You should never use a machinist not familiar with LTX's in the first place anyway.

They are just different enough from an SBC to get you in trouble, and it has happened to many people. The famous 10.0:1CR or less LT1 rebuild is a great example.
Old 05-10-2009, 07:56 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (2)
 
RamAir95TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: South Jersey
Posts: 9,467
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Puck
You should never use a machinist not familiar with LTX's in the first place anyway.

They are just different enough from an SBC to get you in trouble, and it has happened to many people. The famous 10.0:1CR or less LT1 rebuild is a great example.
This is why I schooled my builder before he tackled my build.
Old 05-10-2009, 07:58 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (17)
 
Puck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 4,152
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by RamAir95TA
This is why I schooled my builder before he tackled my build.
I guess that works! Even though I would rather him have schooled himself on a couple of OTHER peoples engines first though! .
Old 05-10-2009, 08:54 PM
  #14  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (108)
 
za355tx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dfw
Posts: 969
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by Puck
I guess that works! Even though I would rather him have schooled himself on a couple of OTHER peoples engines first though! .
True that. I'm lucky my guys have been doing all sorts of motors for like 50 years. Wayne Calvert here in Denton, Texas is a genius and they've done lots of LT1 work.
Old 05-10-2009, 08:59 PM
  #15  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (108)
 
za355tx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dfw
Posts: 969
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by AChotrod
so i got the weak rods? Or more like brittle rods?
It's pretty rare though to actually see rods break though it has happened. The rod bolts would most likely go first. Honestly I wouldn't worry about it. But maybe that'll get you started on that 396 sooner
Old 05-10-2009, 09:16 PM
  #16  
TECH Senior Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (8)
 
gregrob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: 6,000+ feet
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

So should I be good to 7K if I do these rod bolts
Old 05-10-2009, 09:58 PM
  #17  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (108)
 
za355tx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Dfw
Posts: 969
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by gregrob
So should I be good to 7K if I do these rod bolts
Honestly can't see why that would be a problem. ARP makes good stuff. There are guys spinning past 6500 on stock bolts so the ARP bolts won't have a problem as long as the other parts are good enough to handle that kind of RPM.
Old 05-13-2009, 07:19 PM
  #18  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (10)
 
ThreeHonks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: DetroitRacing.com
Posts: 823
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by gregrob
Will these head bolts work for a 1996 Trans Am??
Old 05-13-2009, 10:28 PM
  #19  
TECH Veteran
 
shbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 4,116
Received 50 Likes on 44 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ThreeHonks
Will these head bolts work for a 1996 Trans Am??
Any LT1.
Old 05-13-2009, 11:26 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (5)
 
itSSlowZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: North Augusta, SC
Posts: 515
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

so if the stock rods are still good to spin to 7k, what are the limits of them? rev or power wise



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:57 AM.