J-Rod

I am swamped @ work today, so I don't have time to go through a long and detailed review. I'm trying to get everything taken care of so I can take off for the Thunder Shootout. So, I will keep this short. The car makes some really crazy power. I have done a dyno graph comparison of a totaly stock graph and the G5X3. The Runjet viewer seems to have an issue with my PC. I am using the graph Lou used on the 470.3, and when it gets to 454.xx it goes flat. Anyhow, the HP was 470 with the 3.42s. I was there when they dyno'd the 4.10s and the car made 463. It is a bit louder than it was before, since it now has no cats. It runs ~2500 RPM @ 80 MPH. I ran between 75-80 all the way back, and used 1/2 a tank from Dallas to Houston. As I said, when I have a few moments I will give a complete rundown on things. To put it quite simply, the car is making crazy power...

Here are the two graphs.

HP


TQ

BurnOut

iTrader: (1)

A *bit* louder than it was?? That thing just flat sounds MEAN, man... I dig that car in a big way. Good luck at the shootout. :-)

gator's 99TA

iTrader: (2)

wow is that intake restriction? congrats, the little bit of power you lost will be such an advantage at the track now! good luck!

30th t/a

iTrader: (51)

whats the specs on th G5X3?

Moose

iTrader: (5)

Whats the difference between the two graphs? The one is 428, and the other 454 (but is 470)

I can't wait until I get my car together and hope to see this power..

J-Rod

What do you mean by intake restriction?

Specs are not public per LGM's policy.

One graph is HP the other is torque. They are compared to a stock Z06 graph.

Classic

iTrader: (3)

I think gator was joking about the intake restriction - saying that was why the graph flatlined at 57-5800 rpm Congrats and I can't wait to see it run at thunder this weekend.

Moose

iTrader: (5)

j-rod if I could read that would have made since..

i've always wondered who would get to 500 rwhp with a 346.. It may happen with in the next year the way things are going..