Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Hooker swap headers and mounts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-21-2009, 08:41 PM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
68Hybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SJ, CA
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Hooker swap headers and mounts

Hooker's got a bunch of ls swap headers and mounts available, but its prooving pretty tuff to figure out what pan fits with these. All this header/mount/pan homework is ****** annoying

I'm runnin an LQ4 in a 68 A-body. Any body try these swap headers and mounts? if so what pan did you use? I called hooker and they couldn't give me an answer. The guy thot their parts were based on the F-body LS pan, but wasn't sure. I'd like to be sure (obviously) before i buy.

Anyone?

Thanx
Old 05-22-2009, 07:57 PM
  #2  
Teching In
iTrader: (4)
 
68Chevells1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I had the Hooker swap mounts and headers on my 68 Chevelle. The pan I used is a Street & Performance modified f-body pan. A stock f-body pan will definitely not work with this combo. I would think that many of the aftermarket swap pans (Moroso, Milodon, Autokraft, Canton) should work as well, but I have no first hand knowledge of this.
Old 05-23-2009, 07:06 AM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
mred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wylie,Tx 75098
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i was told it would work and i was told it will not work.
bottom line is i believe the f-body pan will work with the hooker mounts and headers,you may have to use a tall and narrow factory motor mount,if i am not mistaken there are several different factory motor mounts.
short and wide and tall and narrow and the 6 cylinder. need to do some checking on that.
there is alot more stuff you need to know as far as making the motor fit, i will leave the rest up to you, to figure out. Research SKILLS
i had a minor set back to where i had to stop with my build.
good luck
Old 05-23-2009, 07:12 AM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
forcd ind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: woodbine, md
Posts: 4,116
Received 230 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

im running a 69 chevelle, using the Hooker headers & mounts-i used the caddy CTS oilpan, minor bump with the tie rods on lock to lock, but its been on there a year, no problems, and its factory piece
Old 05-23-2009, 07:16 AM
  #5  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
mred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wylie,Tx 75098
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

which mounts did use,and could you have added come shims to clear the tie rods? another words raise the motor a bit
Old 05-23-2009, 11:36 AM
  #6  
Teching In
 
Phat69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Get a LH8 pan they are factory from the H2 ( I think) and are only arpund $250
http://www.brphotrods.com/Oil%20pan.html
Old 05-23-2009, 12:33 PM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
forcd ind's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: woodbine, md
Posts: 4,116
Received 230 Likes on 162 Posts

Default

i used the 350-454 frame mounts, some guys have raised the engine, i fig if it really bothered me i would just notch the pan a little when i do my stroker swap-i "tweaked" a pitman arm and idler arm a tiny bit to lower the drag link and it cleared, nothing noticable in the bumpsteer area, but didnt change it when i installed new front end parts-that other pan looks interesting, but think the same tie rod clear. would be there, would have to meas the pan depth in the same location-must be some kind of Hummer pan or Holden, or something
Old 05-23-2009, 03:51 PM
  #8  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Project GatTagO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: The City of Fountains
Posts: 10,094
Received 1,388 Likes on 877 Posts

Default

Raising the engine is a super bad idea.

Andrew
Old 05-26-2009, 08:33 PM
  #9  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
mred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wylie,Tx 75098
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Project GatTagO
Raising the engine is a super bad idea.

Andrew
"Y" in some applications a raised motor can benefit.
weight transfer is going to be better and clearance is going to be better.
Old 05-27-2009, 01:01 AM
  #10  
RYU
Staging Lane
 
RYU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Project GatTagO
Raising the engine is a super bad idea.

Andrew
if the pinion angle is fine i don't see why raising a motor is such a bad idea
Old 05-27-2009, 01:22 AM
  #11  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
68Hybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SJ, CA
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by forcd ind
i used the 350-454 frame mounts, some guys have raised the engine, i fig if it really bothered me i would just notch the pan a little when i do my stroker swap-i "tweaked" a pitman arm and idler arm a tiny bit to lower the drag link and it cleared, nothing noticable in the bumpsteer area, but didnt change it when i installed new front end parts-that other pan looks interesting, but think the same tie rod clear. would be there, would have to meas the pan depth in the same location-must be some kind of Hummer pan or Holden, or something
How low does the pan hang compared to ur crossmember?
Old 06-05-2009, 06:55 PM
  #12  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
68Hybrid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: SJ, CA
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Back to the top

Any one else?

Forced ind: How low does ur oil pan hang? Any pics available?



Quick Reply: Hooker swap headers and mounts



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:00 AM.