Conversions & Swaps LSX Engines in Non-LSX Vehicles
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

LTx or LSx

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-12-2009, 12:59 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LS2-Zx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North-central Indiana
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default LTx or LSx

I've been doing some research about LSx'ing my car but a friend of mine suggested an LT1. I've kinda looked for a thread that listed pro's and con's against each other but i either find one or the other.

I guess list what you got and explain why not the other?
Old 06-12-2009, 06:25 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Anthony0908's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: CO
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I own a LT1 camaro and want a ls motor we dont have as much after market support as a LS motor. The LS motor is all Aluminum. Can be bored to over crazy numbers, It cools better than a LT motor. The lit goes on and on.
Get the LS motor is just sick.
Old 06-12-2009, 06:39 AM
  #3  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
mred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wylie,Tx 75098
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LT= Lazy Terd
LOL
LS for the win
Old 06-12-2009, 06:42 AM
  #4  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
Pop N Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 3,402
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

LS motors are a complete redesign. They make much better power while still maintainig good street manners.

The LT motors are good motors, but where only made a few years. There is not as much aftermarket support and probably never will be. LT motors also have that crappy optispark. The LS coil near plug is vastly superior and absolutely reliable. the LT motors came with a T56, but it is not compatible with the LS T56's. Thus your trans availability options are more limited too.

An LT motor may be a better choice for your specific swap depending upon which is easier to install and whether you plan to meet your local smog laws. The 1995 motors are pre-OBDII when it comes to smog laws, but have the OBDII ECU that can be programmed.
Old 06-12-2009, 10:00 AM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

I swapped to a LS Engine cause the Aftermarket was very plentiful compared to the LT stuff.
Old 06-12-2009, 11:55 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (32)
 
72VenturaII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Gainesville
Posts: 111
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Anthony0908
I own a LT1 camaro and want a ls motor we dont have as much after market support as a LS motor. The LS motor is all Aluminum. Can be bored to over crazy numbers, It cools better than a LT motor. The lit goes on and on.
Get the LS motor is just sick.
The bold statement is wrong. The AL LS motors have very limited overbore abilities. The iron motors can be bored similarly to an LT or 1st gen motor.
Old 06-12-2009, 12:26 PM
  #7  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

a 6.0 will displace much more than a typical 350 lt1 when overbored.
a .030 over bore will equal 370ci, where a 350 will equal 355ci
cranks,rods, are stronger, superior cylinder head and intake manifold design.
even the ole stock ls1 egr fbody intake is way better than a lt1
made the switch 10 yrs ago
Old 06-12-2009, 02:12 PM
  #8  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

Even the Iron Engines have limited boring...060 over on a 6.0l requires a sonic check.

The Head & Intake design is what really gives it the efficiency.
Old 06-12-2009, 02:15 PM
  #9  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (127)
 
NemeSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Houston,TX
Posts: 6,886
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by the_merv
Even the Iron Engines have limited boring...060 over on a 6.0l requires a sonic check.

The Head & Intake design is what really gives it the efficiency.
my .060 over 6.0 (375ci) has about 10k miles with hyper pistons, stock rods, crank at 490rw now.
Old 06-12-2009, 08:18 PM
  #10  
Banned
iTrader: (5)
 
mred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wylie,Tx 75098
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LS period!!!
NemeSS has said best, although i dont know him personally but i have read alot of things he has said and i think he "KNOWS"
you can take a junk 350 and make it work and run quite well, correct?
you can take a fairly used LS motor rebuild it and run all over that junk rebuilt 350 ALL DAY!
dont get me wrong i love my 350s. parts are sooooo readily AVAILABLE, so are the LS's
Old 06-12-2009, 08:44 PM
  #11  
Launching!
 
kj598bbc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: CHICAGO IL.
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Need we say more ? more power, better manners, parts availability, and it just flat out revs higher and harder; to me of course !!! Go with the Ls bud
Old 06-12-2009, 09:13 PM
  #12  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

It's just newer technology..

I have a friend with a '89 2-door Caprice powered by a 360(.060 over 350) that he built. He wants to build that up to take down my car. I told him that if he wanted to run close to get a 6.0l and build that up.

He doesn't want to switch over cause of all the wiring. I told him I'd help with that. He still wonders how I got so much out of what I had..lol
Old 06-12-2009, 09:18 PM
  #13  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (4)
 
ls1nova71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Liberty, MO
Posts: 4,373
Likes: 0
Received 194 Likes on 140 Posts

Default

Now go to an LT1 forum and listen to all of the good things they have to say about them. I don't think this is the best place to get an unbiased opinion. But for what it's worth, my two cents is, go with the LS, you won't be dissappointed.
Old 06-12-2009, 10:01 PM
  #14  
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
726.0chevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i think the main reason i went ls is lsx heads to ltx, lsx are far superior stock to stock
Old 06-12-2009, 10:02 PM
  #15  
On The Tree
 
denice25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

go for LS...
Old 06-12-2009, 10:18 PM
  #16  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LS2-Zx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North-central Indiana
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Ok so its pretty much unanimous for the LSx. lol

now for round two 5.3? 5.7? or 6.0?
Old 06-12-2009, 10:30 PM
  #17  
13 Second Truck Club
iTrader: (17)
 
726.0chevelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: baton rouge
Posts: 637
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

6.0 they are very reasonably priced
Old 06-13-2009, 12:12 AM
  #18  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (88)
 
the_merv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: The Beach...
Posts: 19,261
Received 63 Likes on 54 Posts

Default

6.0l..
Old 06-13-2009, 02:57 AM
  #19  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (15)
 
nomoneyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Apple Valley - So Cal
Posts: 1,458
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I guess I'm the bummer here. I'm doing a cammed LT1 for my 65 Skylark project. And have a LT1 Camaro and hopefully a LT1 Datsun truck when the Buick is done. I guess I'm a LT1 lover.
Old 06-13-2009, 08:41 AM
  #20  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
LS2-Zx2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North-central Indiana
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 726.0chevelle
6.0 they are very reasonably priced
yeah i was pretty much either going for a cheap 5.3 or splurge for a 6.0 unless i can find a junkyard truck 6.0 and throw some corvette parts at it =]


Quick Reply: LTx or LSx



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:57 AM.