PlanetLSX.com 2010 Camaro SS Baseline Track Results
06-13-2009, 01:17 AM
#1
PlanetLSX.com 2010 Camaro SS Baseline Track Results Details:
2010 Camaro SS/RS (2SS) Link to pics
6-speed manual
100% showroom stock down to the 37 psi air in the rear tires.
I mean 100% stock. No weight removed, as-purchased.
1,200 miles on the car (2 weeks old)
4,045 lbs raceweight (half tank, and I'm 190 lbs)
Holding RPM between 3500-4000 and slipping clutch out on launch.
Powershifting (no lifting throttle between shifts) at red line (6K-6.2K)
Coolant temps 212-218F
Density Altitude was +2,301 ft (it was 96F earlier today, 88 for these passes)
Three consecutive passes (hot lapped):
13.256 @ 108.43 (2.098 60')
13.194 @ 109.62 (2.128 60')
13.070 @ 109.07 (2.057 60')
Videos will be posted later this weekend.
If I can just get a 1.9X 60' time, it will go 12s in the heat. Imagine what it would run in negative density altitude! Probably 12.70s...
I may try to go back to the track on Sunday to get a 12!
Tony
2010 Camaro SS/RS (2SS) Link to pics
6-speed manual
100% showroom stock down to the 37 psi air in the rear tires.
I mean 100% stock. No weight removed, as-purchased.
1,200 miles on the car (2 weeks old)
4,045 lbs raceweight (half tank, and I'm 190 lbs)
Holding RPM between 3500-4000 and slipping clutch out on launch.
Powershifting (no lifting throttle between shifts) at red line (6K-6.2K)
Coolant temps 212-218F
Density Altitude was +2,301 ft (it was 96F earlier today, 88 for these passes)
Three consecutive passes (hot lapped):
13.256 @ 108.43 (2.098 60')
13.194 @ 109.62 (2.128 60')
13.070 @ 109.07 (2.057 60')
Videos will be posted later this weekend.
If I can just get a 1.9X 60' time, it will go 12s in the heat. Imagine what it would run in negative density altitude! Probably 12.70s...
I may try to go back to the track on Sunday to get a 12!
Tony
06-13-2009, 06:46 AM
#5
Hell NO! Like I said, 100% stock down to the factory 37 psi air in the tires. I wanted a true baseline since I will be modding the car quite a bit. Headers/Tune/cold air go on next week perhaps. Then the Magnacharger in a few weeks.
Trending Topics
06-13-2009, 10:42 AM
#8
Glad to see your SS is a little stronger than the one you drove for the magazine article last month.
__________________
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
2013 Corvette Grand Sport A6 LME forged 416, Greg Good ported TFS 255 LS3 heads, 222/242 .629"/.604" 121LSA Pat G blower cam, ARH 1 7/8" headers, ESC Novi 1500 Supercharger w/8 rib direct drive conversion, 747rwhp/709rwtq on 93 octane, 801rwhp/735rwtq on race fuel, 10.1 @ 147.25mph 1/4 mile, 174.7mph Half Mile.
2016 Corvette Z51 M7 Magnuson Heartbeat 2300 supercharger, TSP LT headers, Pat G tuned, 667rwhp, 662rwtq, 191mph TX Mile.
2009.5 Pontiac G8 GT 6.0L, A6, AFR 230v2 heads. 506rwhp/442rwtq. 11.413 @ 121.29mph 1/4 mile, 168.7mph TX Mile
2000 Pewter Ram Air Trans Am M6 heads/cam 508 rwhp/445 rwtq SAE, 183.092 TX Mile
2018 Cadillac Escalade 6.2L A10 Pat G tuned.
LS1,LS2,LS3,LS7,LT1 Custom Camshaft Specialist For custom camshaft help press here.
Custom LSX tuning in person or via email press here.
06-14-2009, 03:50 PM
#15
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Magazine drivers dont drive like you should. Nice to know it has a good clutch setup and doesnt bleed off or pedal stick to the floor like the old F-bodies did.
Tony, Sound like a badass profect with a hell of a car to start with.... but let me ask you: Why magnacharger? I am come to the conclusion that low end torque aside and simplicity a turbo would be the way to go? I guess Magnachargers have the appearance to the wall-street racers who like vette refinement of still being more of a stockish streetcar vs the insanity of a turbo.
Cheers.
06-15-2009, 08:47 AM
#18
I disagree. In +2,300 ft DA weather, I've never seen any stock LS1 f-body best a 13.3 locally. They only ran the 12.9-13.0 range in cold weather. Typically they ran 13.5-13.6 in hot weather here in Houston. The 2010 Camaro is definitely quicker than the 4th gen, in similar weather conditions.
06-15-2009, 02:00 PM
#20
10 Second Club
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: by my computer
Posts: 2,958
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I disagree. In +2,300 ft DA weather, I've never seen any stock LS1 f-body best a 13.3 locally. They only ran the 12.9-13.0 range in cold weather. Typically they ran 13.5-13.6 in hot weather here in Houston. The 2010 Camaro is definitely quicker than the 4th gen, in similar weather conditions.
I agree. 13.1-13.3 was a freaky Monday built car that has perfect weather. Most are in the 13.4-13.6 range on stock factory rubber.