Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Tsp stg 2.5 5.3 vs afr 205

Old 07-21-2009, 08:36 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
 
01Trans Am WS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: INDIANA
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Tsp stg 2.5 5.3 vs afr 205

I have a TR224 112 all bolt-ons which heads would be best for my setup. Also which would make me the most power.
Thx in advance.
Old 07-22-2009, 09:41 AM
  #2  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

We've done engine dyno testing with our 228R camshaft in the past (gives a good enough picture of the differences in heads). The "competitor 205" head is the AFR 205 head.

__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 07-22-2009, 10:35 AM
  #3  
On The Tree
iTrader: (15)
 
jasycz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Damn it I have to get those PRC 215's.
Old 07-22-2009, 10:37 AM
  #4  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (4)
 
Jason 98 TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Texas!
Posts: 4,229
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

as always we'd be happy to test the cylinder heads for you on the engine dyno if you'd like. Cylinder head testing is one of my favorite things to do!
__________________
Jason
Co-Owner, Texas Speed & Performance, Ltd.
2005 Twin Turbo C6
404cid Stroker, 67mm Twins
994rwhp/902lb ft @ 22 psi (mustang dyno) www.Texas-Speed.com
Old 07-22-2009, 10:41 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (17)
 
john563's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: dayton ohio
Posts: 1,638
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

how does your prc 215 compare to your stage 2.5 5.3 heads which I currently have?
Old 07-22-2009, 02:37 PM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
lilbuddy1587's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,691
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Based off of the results that have been posted lately concerning the PRC LS6 heads and PRC 5.3 heads, I do not believe this comparison.

How do we know these aren't one off heads with "super" attention to detail and PERFECT hand finishing/VJ blending? I'm not saying the AFR is king and that your stuff is sub par but based on whats been provided as of late, this is rather inconsistent, don't you think?
Old 07-22-2009, 03:02 PM
  #7  
Staging Lane
 
jkkaz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by lilbuddy1587
Based off of the results that have been posted lately concerning the PRC LS6 heads and PRC 5.3 heads, I do not believe this comparison.

How do we know these aren't one off heads with "super" attention to detail and PERFECT hand finishing/VJ blending? I'm not saying the AFR is king and that your stuff is sub par but based on whats been provided as of late, this is rather inconsistent, don't you think?
Easy, you fly out to Texas and throw the set of heads you're going to buy on an engine and flog it on the dyno.

I saw an open offer on calling BS on their dyno runs, so it's time to either put up or shut up.
Old 07-22-2009, 03:10 PM
  #8  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by lilbuddy1587
Based off of the results that have been posted lately concerning the PRC LS6 heads and PRC 5.3 heads, I do not believe this comparison.

How do we know these aren't one off heads with "super" attention to detail and PERFECT hand finishing/VJ blending? I'm not saying the AFR is king and that your stuff is sub par but based on whats been provided as of late, this is rather inconsistent, don't you think?
I understand that some people will always have these doubts, and all I can do is assure you that they were regular heads without any extra work done. We can repeat the tests with you present anytime you can be here (or a friend of yours, etc) if that helps. We have nothing to hide and are always offering folks to come check us out anytime! The door's always open!
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 07-22-2009, 03:30 PM
  #9  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Red99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Interesting results. It looks like the 205's are down 10RWTQ/15RWHP on the PRC 215's. You said all the heads are as-cast with no extra work done. Curious on the following:

Gasket used with each combination?
Timing used with each combination?
Any milling done on any of the heads?
A/F ratio on all the combos?

Just to make sure we're comparing apples to apples (comp ratio, quench, tune, etc.). One head might tolerate more/less timing than another so the tune is going to definitely have an effect on your results but I know you guys already know that.
Old 07-22-2009, 03:40 PM
  #10  
LS1Tech Premium Sponsor
iTrader: (5)
 
Sales2@Texas-speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Texas!
Posts: 5,053
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

The heads were milled to net the same static compression with the GM MLS gasket. Each was tuned to achieve same AF, timing set for max power without KR (just to the point of KR and then backed off in most cases, some just didn't make any more power with more timing), etc to ensure apples to apples.
__________________


Largest Stocking Distributor of LS-x Engines / CHECK OUT OUR NEW WEBSITE!

COMP - FAST - PACESETTER - DIAMOND RACING - EAGLE SPECIALTY PRODUCTS - CALLIES - COMETIC GASKETS
RAM CLUTCHES - MOSER ENGINEERING - KOOK'S HEADERS - ARP - GM BOLTS AND GASKETS - MSD - NGK
POWERBOND - ASP - AND MORE!
Old 07-22-2009, 06:15 PM
  #11  
Restricted User
 
willyfastz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Some say the TFS 215s are the best, deff. better trusted.
Old 07-22-2009, 06:46 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

its funny that not only did the prc casted heads out do the AFR's but so did the 5.3 prc heads.
Old 07-22-2009, 06:48 PM
  #13  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
AINT SKEERED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Albany La
Posts: 3,985
Received 350 Likes on 239 Posts

Default

lots of newbies are going to jump out and by the budget heads based off of these comparisons, got to pay for that dyno at all cost right?
Old 07-22-2009, 08:08 PM
  #14  
Restricted User
 
willyfastz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 588
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AINT SKEERED
lots of newbies are going to jump out and by the budget heads based off of these comparisons, got to pay for that dyno at all cost right?
It does appear that the new PRC 215's are decent heads. But I'm wondering if the QC on them is going to go the same as all the other PRC heads.
Old 07-22-2009, 08:58 PM
  #15  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Guys,

Regarding the dyno data provided by Texas Speed, I think it goes without saying this type of thing is better handled (and received) if an independent party handles all the testing (for obvious reasons).

I have plenty of brand "P" data that I neglected to post or compare over the years....coming from the source (myself) most of it would be discounted anyway and I feel there is something underhanded about it as much as you would like to shout it from the rooftops.

Instead I focus on promoting our product on its own merits as best I can....even my huge "flow thread" while I could have buried numerous products and company claims, it was all handled as politically correct as possible providing most of you with alot of food for thought and alot of things to think about. The outcome from reading thru it (in short) simply being don't believe all the hype regarding published flow data. Before I started that thread there was more BS numbers being thrown around the net than you could shake a stick at. Hell, at the time every head flowed 300 CFM, and the better ones easily over 320 (reality.....not even close).

What I say is look at all the independent dyno data and results circulating about the cylinder heads in question or the cylinder heads you may be considering purchasing. Also, its important to try and get data from more than one shop because that is a much better barometer. Installs done by guys like yourself finally dyno'ed at the local shop that doesn't have a care in the world regarding the outcome is easily the best cross section of data to pour over and learn from. Most people are here to sell product and earn a living....not just provide customer support. Some more than others obviously.

Also, include/consider the other very important aspects of a purchase of this nature such as quality control, repeatability, customer service, and reliability....not to mention resale value.

When you do and assuming you place a value on alot of that important criteria I just mentioned, I assure you that "Competitor 205" will be something you should give alot more serious thought to, even if it means saving up a little longer. Its a proven performer that delivers every time.

Also, how many unhappy AFR owners are out there versus some of the other choices you might have. Tough to find an owner of our product not thrilled with his purchase and that statement goes a long way.

I bit my tongue all day whether to engage in this thread but I felt the need to say my peace in as tactful a manner as possible while still getting my point across. We have been doing this for close to forty years and we absolutely specialize in this field.....name another company as single focused as AFR.....good luck with that.

Take your time doing the research.....I assure you the more time you take the better our product is going to look.

And check this out whenever you get a chance

http://www.airflowresearch.com/why_afr.php

Regards,
Tony
Old 07-22-2009, 09:02 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
 
99Ls1fever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Eaton, Colorado
Posts: 1,822
Received 36 Likes on 30 Posts

Default

I love Texas Speed and have dropped 8k there in over the past three years. But I would rather have AFR Heads anytime of the day!
Old 07-22-2009, 09:31 PM
  #17  
Tough Mudder
iTrader: (36)
 
Hilton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 992
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'd like to see the TrickFlow CNC 215cc added to that graph just for fun.
Old 07-22-2009, 09:43 PM
  #18  
TECH Apprentice
iTrader: (10)
 
JS01's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Odessa, Texas
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I LOL'D 8 TIMES

at that chart.

OP, get the AFR's.
Old 07-22-2009, 09:56 PM
  #19  
Jedi Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Gh0st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: MN
Posts: 668
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Marketing at its finest.
Old 07-22-2009, 10:48 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
 
Johny GTO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Florida
Posts: 844
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
Guys,

Regarding the dyno data provided by Texas Speed, I think it goes without saying this type of thing is better handled (and received) if an independent party handles all the testing (for obvious reasons).

I have plenty of brand "P" data that I neglected to post or compare over the years....coming from the source (myself) most of it would be discounted anyway and I feel there is something underhanded about it as much as you would like to shout it from the rooftops.

Instead I focus on promoting our product on its own merits as best I can....even my huge "flow thread" while I could have buried numerous products and company claims, it was all handled as politically correct as possible providing most of you with alot of food for thought and alot of things to think about. The outcome from reading thru it (in short) simply being don't believe all the hype regarding published flow data. Before I started that thread there was more BS numbers being thrown around the net than you could shake a stick at. Hell, at the time every head flowed 300 CFM, and the better ones easily over 320 (reality.....not even close).

What I say is look at all the independent dyno data and results circulating about the cylinder heads in question or the cylinder heads you may be considering purchasing. Also, its important to try and get data from more than one shop because that is a much better barometer. Installs done by guys like yourself finally dyno'ed at the local shop that doesn't have a care in the world regarding the outcome is easily the best cross section of data to pour over and learn from. Most people are here to sell product and earn a living....not just provide customer support. Some more than others obviously.

Also, include/consider the other very important aspects of a purchase of this nature such as quality control, repeatability, customer service, and reliability....not to mention resale value.

When you do and assuming you place a value on alot of that important criteria I just mentioned, I assure you that "Competitor 205" will be something you should give alot more serious thought to, even if it means saving up a little longer. Its a proven performer that delivers every time.

Also, how many unhappy AFR owners are out there versus some of the other choices you might have. Tough to find an owner of our product not thrilled with his purchase and that statement goes a long way.

I bit my tongue all day whether to engage in this thread but I felt the need to say my peace in as tactful a manner as possible while still getting my point across. We have been doing this for close to forty years and we absolutely specialize in this field.....name another company as single focused as AFR.....good luck with that.

Take your time doing the research.....I assure you the more time you take the better our product is going to look.

And check this out whenever you get a chance

http://www.airflowresearch.com/why_afr.php

Regards,
Tony
Very tactfully and professionally handled, Tony. I am sure you could have turned this into a monsterous pissing match, hurling insults back and forth, and posting graphs and info that show disasterous results from people using PRC heads. However, you took the high road. Perhaps you are a better man than I.

Texas Speed,
This comes across as a major douche bag move in my opinion. I'm sorry, it really does. I'm not sure why, because a thread comparing cams wouldnt make me feel that way. Perhaps its because in cam threads, its a matter of "this cam works better in this setup", where as in this thread i got the feeling it was a "my heads are better than their heads" kinda thing. PErhaps that was because in this thread, it wasnt presented like "hey guys, we have some dyno results from a head swap we did. ON THIS SETUP, we actually got better results out of our heads than a well known after market head". Now you could have left out the name, you could have stressed that it was "on this setup", etc. Instead it came across as "our head is better, period end of story.".

I think thats pretty dick. I think if Tony would have put up a thread like this, where his heads crushed yours, you would be pretty pissed off and calling for him to remove the thread because it was low class. As Tony said, i am sure he could put up plenty of graphs where your heads got their clocks cleaned, plenty of flow bench results where your heads performed no where near they should have, etc. I myself have seen some horrible heads come out of your shop. Terrible performance, terrible quality control, etc. Usually, it gets swept under the rug.

This was a shitty move all around.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Tsp stg 2.5 5.3 vs afr 205



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:23 PM.