sspower23

Torquer v3 - 231/234 .643/.598 112 lsa?
vs
Texas giant- 248/254 .615/.622 112 lsa?

to go with PRC LS6 CNC ported heads

01ssreda4

iTrader: (96)

I personally really like the torquer v3. It pulls awesome.

LS1-NAVY

iTrader: (1)

giant wont fit with out fly cutting

SOMbitch

iTrader: (8)

^^^^^uh huh....it's for bigger bore motors........

383lt1impala

iTrader: (33)

The ms4 cam has more lift and doesn't require flycutting. I don't see why the giant wouldn't fit.

TransAmcoupe98

iTrader: (10)

I would consider the Torquer v.2 also. It has one more degree of duration and alot less lift on the intake side. All that lift on the Torquer v.3 is hard on your valvetrain parts. Check out this thread comparing the the Tv.2 vs Tv.3.

https://ls1tech.com/forums/generatio...uer-v2-v3.html

2002 SS

iTrader: (8)

so would the Texas giant fit in a 408 with the heads the OP mentioned?

LS1-NAVY

iTrader: (1)

yup

00MaroonZ28

iTrader: (3)

Yeah, the Texas Giant cam is a stroker cam. I've got the TR version of the V3. Pulls hard, but like said before, it's hard on the valve train. Wouldn't put it in a DD car. You'll be replacing the intake spring every 10k miles. With it you will have to flycut if the heads are milled. You'll also have to worry about emissions in Cali if it's not just a track car.

Sales2@Texas-speed

iTrader: (5)

Kind of apples and oranges between these two. What short-block are you running? Any valve relief? Like mentioned, the Giant is intended for larger than stock cubes typically.

Also, the MS4 isn't apples to apples with the Giant just because it has more lift....at max lift the piston is already well on its way back down the cylinder....duration plays a huge part in that discussion!

Let us know a bit more about your short-block and heads, and we can make an informed suggestion for your combo