2010 Camaro vs 2010 Mustang, who u think wins :)
09-04-2009, 04:01 PM
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Centreville, VA
Posts: 536
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
2010 Camaro vs 2010 Mustang, who u think wins :) Not sure if this has been shared, but a good read from Automobile Magazine:
2010 Camaro vs 2010 Stang
Last Page Comparing Specs:
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...e_testing.html
First Page
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...ies/index.html
2010 Camaro vs 2010 Stang
Last Page Comparing Specs:
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...e_testing.html
First Page
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...ies/index.html
09-04-2009, 04:59 PM
#3
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Its more like Camaro 12.9 to Mustang 13.5....there not that slow to say their a 14 second car. They rated them on overall performance, the Mustang has a Track pack and really livens them up on road course. Its all about preference...you either like a Camaro, or you like a Mustang.
Trending Topics
09-04-2009, 05:32 PM
#8
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure if this has been shared, but a good read from Automobile Magazine:
2010 Camaro vs 2010 Stang
Last Page Comparing Specs:
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...e_testing.html
First Page
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...ies/index.html
2010 Camaro vs 2010 Stang
Last Page Comparing Specs:
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...e_testing.html
First Page
http://www.automobilemag.com/feature...ies/index.html
it would be closer in comparing the v-6 camaro to the mustang gt
ford has to put their mustangs on "breathing machines" aka supercharger to compete with a ss camaro
if you wanna go slow get a ford if you wanna real sports car get the ss
this comparison is more fair, a stock ss vs a gt with a blower
here is the 2010 roush 427R mustang "supercharged" lol
basically a gt with a blower and overpriced badges and decals
0-60...4.7sec
0-100..11.00
1/4 mi..13.1@108
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...est/index.html
09-04-2009, 05:40 PM
#9
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 571
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
dude you are comparing an NFL pro to a little league sixth grader
it would be closer in comparing the v-6 camaro to the mustang gt
ford has to put their mustangs on "breathing machines" aka supercharger to compete with a ss camaro
if you wanna go slow get a ford if you wanna real sports car get the ss
this comparison is more fair, a stock ss vs a gt with a blower
here is the 2010 roush 427R mustang "supercharged" lol
basically a gt with a blower and overpriced badges and decals
0-60...4.7sec
0-100..11.00
1/4 mi..13.1@108
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...est/index.html
it would be closer in comparing the v-6 camaro to the mustang gt
ford has to put their mustangs on "breathing machines" aka supercharger to compete with a ss camaro
if you wanna go slow get a ford if you wanna real sports car get the ss
this comparison is more fair, a stock ss vs a gt with a blower
here is the 2010 roush 427R mustang "supercharged" lol
basically a gt with a blower and overpriced badges and decals
0-60...4.7sec
0-100..11.00
1/4 mi..13.1@108
http://www.motortrend.com/roadtests/...est/index.html
09-04-2009, 07:12 PM
#12
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, Tejas
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The "track pack" is as mild a suspension setup you can get on the mustang. The steeda comps on my car are much more than +75lb over stock rates, that's just silly. And the FRPP non-adjustable dampers are a joke.
I'm sure the camaro's are as well. These "tests" are so lame. Tune both cars engines on a dyno to their potential with completely stock setups along with the best suspension components money can buy on the aftermarket and retest. Then, and ONLY then will it be a true test of car vs car. Then again, it's not fair because mustangs have had five years of major aftermarket support with suspension components. We may never see a fair comparison...
I'm sure the camaro's are as well. These "tests" are so lame. Tune both cars engines on a dyno to their potential with completely stock setups along with the best suspension components money can buy on the aftermarket and retest. Then, and ONLY then will it be a true test of car vs car. Then again, it's not fair because mustangs have had five years of major aftermarket support with suspension components. We may never see a fair comparison...
09-04-2009, 07:39 PM
#14
TECH Apprentice
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Posts: 397
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The "track pack" is as mild a suspension setup you can get on the mustang. The steeda comps on my car are much more than +75lb over stock rates, that's just silly. And the FRPP non-adjustable dampers are a joke.
I'm sure the camaro's are as well. These "tests" are so lame. Tune both cars engines on a dyno to their potential with completely stock setups along with the best suspension components money can buy on the aftermarket and retest. Then, and ONLY then will it be a true test of car vs car. Then again, it's not fair because mustangs have had five years of major aftermarket support with suspension components. We may never see a fair comparison...
I'm sure the camaro's are as well. These "tests" are so lame. Tune both cars engines on a dyno to their potential with completely stock setups along with the best suspension components money can buy on the aftermarket and retest. Then, and ONLY then will it be a true test of car vs car. Then again, it's not fair because mustangs have had five years of major aftermarket support with suspension components. We may never see a fair comparison...
09-04-2009, 07:39 PM
#15
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, Tejas
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lol, I can't argue with that... but the L99 auto ss I saw today made me stop and admire the interior for enough time that I felt like a lech and looked around for security before I moved on.
Interior aside, I'd love to see a fair comparison of mustang/camaro and am excited that this may finally be the time we'll get to see it. Good times ahead, I hope.
Interior aside, I'd love to see a fair comparison of mustang/camaro and am excited that this may finally be the time we'll get to see it. Good times ahead, I hope.
09-04-2009, 07:51 PM
#16
Staging Lane
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Austin, Tejas
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Is that base hp you got in your sig, or RWHP....im just wondering, seems high, especially on a Mustang Dyno... 337Rwhp with those mods on a MD seems off...An LS1 with a CAI,Tune and Full exhaust wouldnt pull 337Rwhp on a mustang dyno. Especially with 4.10s.... Honestly it would be hard to see those numbers on a Dynometer from a S197 mustang with those mods.
I had the 4.10's along with 20'' wheels and 275/35 rears at the time. Lightweight driveshaft...
why would I post fwhp numbers??? to show my massive 400hp lol?
Last edited by Rubrignitz; 09-04-2009 at 08:05 PM.
09-05-2009, 09:02 AM
#18
Is that base hp you got in your sig, or RWHP....im just wondering, seems high, especially on a Mustang Dyno... 337Rwhp with those mods on a MD seems off...An LS1 with a CAI,Tune and Full exhaust wouldnt pull 337Rwhp on a mustang dyno. Especially with 4.10s.... Honestly it would be hard to see those numbers on a Dynometer from a S197 mustang with those mods.
Mine did.....lid, full exhaust, ported TB, tune. 341.6hp 355tq. on Mustang Dyno.
09-07-2009, 11:06 PM
#20
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (16)
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Romeoville, IL
Posts: 1,419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
can't wait to see who is quicker when they compare the 2011 camaro SS and Mustang Gt. I have a feeling that the SS will lose. It is about time ford puts a motor in the gt's. Tho you have to thank GM and Dodge for that.