gt500 vs supercharge ss
#1
Teching In
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: ft. myers fla
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#3
Administrator
#6
Administrator
STS = garbage. Vortec = no thanks. TVS = Decent, but not a Whipple or a KB. Procharger - great blower, which is why I said "other than" a Procharger. I'd love to see a 3.4L Whipple sitting on top of a LS3.
#7
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (8)
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Here and sometimes there too.
Posts: 13,845
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not sure how the TVS = "Decent"
IMO it's one of the better ones out there if you go the S/C route. Buddy of mine just made 573rwhp/549rwtq with a 1900 @ 12.2 psi on his stock 5.3L with nothing more than valve springs. And with a 75 shot he made 626rwhp/762rwtq. Sounds more than "Decent" to me.
IMO it's one of the better ones out there if you go the S/C route. Buddy of mine just made 573rwhp/549rwtq with a 1900 @ 12.2 psi on his stock 5.3L with nothing more than valve springs. And with a 75 shot he made 626rwhp/762rwtq. Sounds more than "Decent" to me.
Trending Topics
#9
Administrator
Not sure how the TVS = "Decent"
IMO it's one of the better ones out there if you go the S/C route. Buddy of mine just made 573rwhp/549rwtq with a 1900 @ 12.2 psi on his stock 5.3L with nothing more than valve springs. And with a 75 shot he made 626rwhp/762rwtq. Sounds more than "Decent" to me.
IMO it's one of the better ones out there if you go the S/C route. Buddy of mine just made 573rwhp/549rwtq with a 1900 @ 12.2 psi on his stock 5.3L with nothing more than valve springs. And with a 75 shot he made 626rwhp/762rwtq. Sounds more than "Decent" to me.
#12
12 Second Club
iTrader: (26)
Sounded like a automatic to lol. So I doubt it's the driver. I think the reason it looks slow is because the 2 cars racing weigh like 203239293029lbs to begin with, I pull gt500's by a car or two from a dig easy, but they're pretty damn close races when it's from a roll. So saying that.. the camaro doesn't impress me.