Generation III Internal Engine 1997-2006 LS1 | LS6
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Bryant 3.886 stroke crank with honda journals or a standard 4" Callies Dragonslayer?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-09-2009, 04:54 PM
  #1  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
CanuckSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ancaster, ON - Where F-bodies are rare!
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Bryant 3.886 stroke crank with honda journals or a standard 4" Callies Dragonslayer?

Hi guys,
I am looking for some input about an engine build.
I currently have the Bryant crank with the honda rod journals (1.850). This would build a 396" combo. I was figuring that I should be able to spin the **** out of the bryant crank and that the shorter stroke would probably help with that as well.

The other option is to use a 4" callies dragonslayer with conventional 2.1 inch rod journals. This would give me a 408" engine, which has been done a million times.

I think the cost will come out about even. I have a partial set of rods and pistons to use with the 408 combo (UPS lost a rod and piston).

The combo is going to be N/A (4" bore using a 6.0L block) and I am going to try spin it to 9-10 000 rpm.

Sticking with the advanced tech part...
Would the shorter stroke and smaller rod journals help to spin the engine? Are the 1.850 journals able to hold up to high RPMS?

Any thoughts would be appreciated.

Last edited by CanuckSS; 10-09-2009 at 05:10 PM.
Old 10-10-2009, 09:29 AM
  #2  
FormerVendor
iTrader: (3)
 
Shawn @ VA Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Virginia Beach,Virginia
Posts: 2,991
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

depends on what you going to do with it,weight of the car,stick vs. auto,cylinder heads used,valvetrain,intake,n/a vs. f/i vs. n2o.
Old 10-10-2009, 10:06 AM
  #3  
TECH Regular
Thread Starter
iTrader: (13)
 
CanuckSS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Ancaster, ON - Where F-bodies are rare!
Posts: 472
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Weight is just under 3000 lbs.
6 speed
jesel valvetrain
n/a
not sure on heads yet.
Old 10-10-2009, 02:06 PM
  #4  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (7)
 
Sharpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Southeastern IL
Posts: 4,997
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Moved from Advanced Tech to Gen III Internal.
Old 11-22-2009, 02:46 PM
  #5  
TECH Regular
 
mebuildit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Scottsdale, Arizona
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Spin a motor high RPM's = changing valve springs a lot!
Old 11-23-2009, 06:30 AM
  #6  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (18)
 
DONAIMIAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: NW Houston, TX
Posts: 10,036
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mebuildit
Spin a motor high RPM's = changing valve springs a lot!
Spinning a motor high = changing motors a lot. **** doesn't last at that kind of RPM.
Old 11-23-2009, 06:25 PM
  #7  
JPH
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (2)
 
JPH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 3,776
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by mebuildit
Spin a motor high RPM's = changing valve springs a lot!
I would use less stroke and more bore if it was my motor.
Old 11-24-2009, 11:07 AM
  #8  
TECH Veteran
iTrader: (21)
 
1CAMWNDR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Posts: 4,247
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Do the 4": crank. That will give you a 402, not a 408. You have to bore the block .030" over to get the 408. You will have a much happier motor making more useable torque and power at lower rpm with more cubic inches.



Quick Reply: Bryant 3.886 stroke crank with honda journals or a standard 4" Callies Dragonslayer?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:49 PM.