Dennis@SpectacleSolutions

iTrader: (16)

The FAST 92mm intake is no longer available through FAST. They are now going completely to the 102mm platform.
These intakes will be 849.00 plus shipping.

I will give more information as I get it. If you are interested in placing an order please give us a call.

Thanks
jeff

SuperSport4life

iTrader: (7)

I heard these intakes will not fit fbodies with stock hoods and that a cowl will be needed to make this intake fit, can you confirm if this is true or not???

VIPRETR2

iTrader: (63)

You're probably thinking of the FAST LSXrt manifold for cathedral port headed trucks. It's listed on this page, middle tab part number 146602 http://www.fuelairspark.com/2/FS/Intake/Default.aspx The new LSXr for cars is listed on the left tab, part number 146302.

Larry

Dennis@SpectacleSolutions

iTrader: (16)

you are definately thinking of the truck intake version. this intake will most definately fit an Fbody.

They will also fit corvettes. we are test fitting one to a C-5 vette right now as I type this.

Reaper SS

iTrader: (9)

What changed the 92 seemed to be working well. Do they have any real world results for the new manifold in the cathedral design.

I have seen very nice gains with the 92 in stock form and in ported versions so im very interested in see the new designs performance since it was not that impressive over the stock LS7 ported manifold and haven't heard any info of the 102 over the stock LS3 either.

Looks like they are trying to eliminate the 92 since its completely different casting than the 102 so their cutting down on their manufacturing costs by only making one manifold and now offering the different runners to fit multiple head configurations.

I just hope its not a ploy to cut down on costs and more for an improved product for the cathedral port intake guys.

Looking forward to see real world results ASAP.

Dennis@SpectacleSolutions

iTrader: (16)

If you already have a 92, then upgrading to this 102 really wont be a good option for you IMO. I think it will probably make 4 to 6 horsepower over the 92.

I think you hit the nail square on the head right there.

Reaper SS

iTrader: (9)

Were you able to test the 102 over the 92 cathedral port yet to see the actual difference.

If its not an across the board gain i think ill be looking for old stock 92's real soon.

Thanks for the feed back and head up info.

Dennis@SpectacleSolutions

iTrader: (16)

I havent personally done any testing, but I have seen the sheets that FAST did from testing and it is an across the board gain over the 92.

I know the person doing the testing over there personally and its legit. They dont fudge numbers to sell product.

01wssick

iTrader: (27)

I'd like to see a dyno sheet on a ls1 92mm vs 102mm.

Reaper SS

iTrader: (9)

Jeff
Thank you for the good inside info only time will tell now when people start posting up individual results on different combos. I just wonder if this will hurt the small 346 builds that used the 90's and 92's.

It looks like its going to be a benefit for the larger displacement builds all around.

SuperSport4life

iTrader: (7)

Yes, I was thinking about the truck intake. Thank you for making this clarification for me! This looks like one bad *** intake!

4U2NV-SS

iTrader: (21)

How much for the combo? Intake and TB?

toby

iTrader: (1)

will these intakes work well in a fi application?

LTFOUR

iTrader: (23)

Nice.

Austin@HPE

did it fit a c5

GrannySShifting

iTrader: (10)

ANy word on C5 fitment?

Spellbound

What about going from a ported 90 to a ported 102 on a 427?