Late Model Racecrafts Slayer Package with F.A.S.T. 102mm intake and LMR TB installed!
#1
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: houston
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Late Model Racecrafts Slayer Package with F.A.S.T. 102mm intake and LMR TB installed!
Just finished up some more testing with our new 102mm TB for the 2010 Camaro. First dyno graph is our slayer package and the second graph is with the F.A.S.T 102mm intake and the LMR 102mm TB installed. This throttle body has built in bungs for a nitrous kit or to inject methanal for you forced induction cars.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oRWK2Z25yE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oRWK2Z25yE
#6
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rowlett,Tx
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You guys are the only people to show more power after the fast 102mm swap.
Back to back to back on a 530rwhp heads/cam 2010 Camaro didnt show a gain at all with the 102 intake and tb.
Back to back to back on a 530rwhp heads/cam 2010 Camaro didnt show a gain at all with the 102 intake and tb.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Addict
iTrader: (13)
That indicates 1 and/or 2 possibilities:
1. The factory intake is not much of a restriction (until much higher airflow)
2. The factory TB is the restriction
So yes, on LS3s, back to back on mild/stock motors, the stock intake is not much of a restriction. That leads one .to deduce that likely:
1. The FAST 102 is not worthwhile on LS3s until mods get pretty serious
2. LMR's 102mm TB is worthwhile on modded motors and might be on mild ones too
#10
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rowlett,Tx
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
You're missing something: this swap is the intake AND TB. No one else offers a 102mm TB yet to my knowledge.
That indicates 1 and/or 2 possibilities:
1. The factory intake is not much of a restriction (until much higher airflow)
2. The factory TB is the restriction
So yes, on LS3s, back to back on mild/stock motors, the stock intake is not much of a restriction. That leads one .to deduce that likely:
1. The FAST 102 is not worthwhile on LS3s until mods get pretty serious
2. LMR's 102mm TB is worthwhile on modded motors and might be on mild ones too
That indicates 1 and/or 2 possibilities:
1. The factory intake is not much of a restriction (until much higher airflow)
2. The factory TB is the restriction
So yes, on LS3s, back to back on mild/stock motors, the stock intake is not much of a restriction. That leads one .to deduce that likely:
1. The FAST 102 is not worthwhile on LS3s until mods get pretty serious
2. LMR's 102mm TB is worthwhile on modded motors and might be on mild ones too
Did a back to back with just the intake swap then added the Nick Williams 102mm tb. Didnt gain any power at all. Not one shop has been able to produce results on the ls3 with the FAST 102 intake.
Im not missing anything but a reply from LMR.
#11
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rowlett,Tx
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The LS7 does gain power and it has been documented over and over. The LS3 on the otherhand does not gain 20rwhp from the intake and tb swap or even 1 rwhp for that matter.
I think LMR is simply trying to market their TB.
#16
TECH Addict
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: houston
Posts: 2,422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The car has the FAST 102 intake and a NW 102 mm tb. The Nick Williams 102 mm tb was out two months ago.
Did a back to back with just the intake swap then added the Nick Williams 102mm tb. Didnt gain any power at all. Not one shop has been able to produce results on the ls3 with the FAST 102 intake.
Im not missing anything but a reply from LMR.
Did a back to back with just the intake swap then added the Nick Williams 102mm tb. Didnt gain any power at all. Not one shop has been able to produce results on the ls3 with the FAST 102 intake.
Im not missing anything but a reply from LMR.