Gears & Axles Driveshafts | Rearends | Differentials | Gears | 12 Bolt | 9 Inch | Dana

2.73 to 3.42 mpg difference

Old 06-06-2010, 06:33 AM
  #1  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default 2.73 to 3.42 mpg difference

Hey guys I really wanted to do a stall but wat told t would suck with the stock gears so here I am lol. My only big concern is fuel economy which is why I'm lookin at 3.42s over the 3.73s after skme calculations it's lookjn like I'd b spinning 2500 rpms at 80 instead if the 2000 I do now. Is that enough to completely tank my mpg? Only reason I'm worry is cuz 3.73s put the car at 3000rpms at 80 which I saw drops mpg down to any 21 on the highway.
Thanks Dan
Old 06-06-2010, 08:07 PM
  #2  
Launching!
iTrader: (15)
 
whiteLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: tampa,fl
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by redbird555
Hey guys I really wanted to do a stall but wat told t would suck with the stock gears so here I am lol. My only big concern is fuel economy which is why I'm lookin at 3.42s over the 3.73s after skme calculations it's lookjn like I'd b spinning 2500 rpms at 80 instead if the 2000 I do now. Is that enough to completely tank my mpg? Only reason I'm worry is cuz 3.73s put the car at 3000rpms at 80 which I saw drops mpg down to any 21 on the highway.
Thanks Dan
I use to have a 00 z28 and went to 342's I really didn't notice much of a different in mpg at all. I wish I would have done a converter insead of gears though. I saw a guy with a 3400 stall, full exhaust,cam, and a nitrous kit go 10's with 273 gears. But that was after I did my gears wish I would have done the stall instead of gears for sure.
Old 06-06-2010, 08:11 PM
  #3  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (21)
 
Slash8915's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: League City, Texas
Posts: 616
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

You won't notice a difference. I'm about to go from 3.23's to 3.73's and a 3200 stall. Just the gears alone won't cut your mpg in half or anything, but a stall will reduce your mpg a lot more.
Old 06-06-2010, 09:33 PM
  #4  
Launching!
iTrader: (5)
 
98ZEMT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lexington, SC
Posts: 247
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I went from 2.73 to 3.73. I haven't noticed a difference in MPG. It still sucks!!! I get about 18 average. Mostly city driving. And a leaking gas tank. So, no worries. Oh, and my tach is off by 200 RPMs. It says 2800 at 80 which is actually only 2600. That's with the 3.73.
Old 06-06-2010, 10:20 PM
  #5  
TECH Senior Member
 
garygnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 5,446
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

stall converters have a lock up clutch,which acts like a 5 gear.if you do alot a city driving you will lose some mpg.if you want to beat stangs and rice racer,get a 3500 stall and a trans cooler.
Old 06-07-2010, 12:21 AM
  #6  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Youshallgofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Prospect, Illinois
Posts: 115
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I just got a 3600 stall and 3.42s installed. On my first fill up I figured that I averaged about 15.7mpg of mixed driving.
Old 06-07-2010, 05:59 AM
  #7  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

This is the same thing everyone has been telling me and I dont do a lot of city driving thats why the stall kind of appealed to me I had other threads about it and people were telling me to do gears first and vice versa I was looking at around a 3200 stall because of the 2.73's and the car is a dd so I think that what I'll be looking at here soon.
Old 06-07-2010, 06:53 PM
  #8  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
Youshallgofo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mount Prospect, Illinois
Posts: 115
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've also heard that you'd want to upgrade your gears anyway if your going with a stall just because of the stress it adds to your transmission and because driving around with a stall just feels weird with 2.73s compared to higher gears. A few mpgs down isn't going to kill you, I wouldn't worry about it anyway. Thats why you have a V8!
Old 06-07-2010, 07:09 PM
  #9  
12 Second Club
iTrader: (51)
 
projectX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: MI
Posts: 1,008
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Youshallgofo
I've also heard that you'd want to upgrade your gears anyway if your going with a stall just because of the stress it adds to your transmission and because driving around with a stall just feels weird with 2.73s compared to higher gears. A few mpgs down isn't going to kill you, I wouldn't worry about it anyway. Thats why you have a V8!
agreed. mpg+sports car= no no
Old 06-08-2010, 06:31 AM
  #10  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

so true lol but v8+shittympg=less money for college beer fund lol a few mpgs wont matter I'll prolly end up doing the stall first since everyone says it should be the first mod to an a4 lol.
Old 06-08-2010, 10:21 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (8)
 
Midnight02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,620
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Like the others have stated, few have purchased a LS powered F-body for their fuel efficiency.

That being said, the swap from a 2.73 to a 3.42 or 3.73 (which I would recommend) would only have a nominal effect on mileage. Perhaps you get 20 less miles on a tank of gas. If you average 20 mpg (highway), that's one extra gallon of gas at $2.85 you'd have to purchase to go the same distance as before.

I do understand the beer fund as noted above -- that $2.85 equates to a 6-pack of Beast light or Southpaw!
Old 06-08-2010, 01:04 PM
  #12  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (96)
 
01ssreda4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Turnin' Wrenches Infractions: 005
Posts: 24,241
Likes: 0
Received 79 Likes on 70 Posts

Default

dont drive 80 mph and you wont have to worry about the mpg difference.
Old 06-08-2010, 04:45 PM
  #13  
On The Tree
iTrader: (20)
 
2fresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

thinking of doing the same thing but my camaro is way better on gas than the 96 mustang i use to have before the z.
Old 06-09-2010, 05:36 AM
  #14  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01ssreda4
dont drive 80 mph and you wont have to worry about the mpg difference.
Lol i try not to usually but when Im driving home from college its about a 3 hr drive through the country and if your not doin 80 prepare to get ran over, even the slow lane moves 75+ most people are doin 85-90
Old 06-11-2010, 11:39 AM
  #15  
TECH Veteran
Thread Starter
iTrader: (14)
 
redbird555's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Pompano Beach FL
Posts: 4,444
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

well guys it looks like the stall may have to come after the gears.... Lol I was at the junk yard today getting a few things with my grandpa when I stumbled up a 98 v6 camaro with the 3.42 and posi option. The car had unknown mileage but the interior had no rips the underbody was clean as hell, the keyless remote looked almost new even the shocks were grease free so I figured it couldnt have had a hell of a lot. Anyway I pulled out the auburn posi and gears and they all look great no cunks missing and the magnet just had regular metal fuzz on it. Anyway I ended up walking out with the ring and pinion along with the auburn carrier for $45 bucks lol so I figured I really cant go wrong even though I'm more of a torsen guys as far as the posi goes.


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:24 PM.