New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Any Drawbacks to Sub-frame Connectors

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-04-2004, 11:37 AM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Backfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Any Drawbacks to Sub-frame Connectors

I realize the benefits to adding SFCs to a vehicle; my main goal is to tighten up my '02 while it is still relatively new, and to hopefully avoid the rattle trap syndrome that plagued my 94. But are there any long term issues to deal with? Since the SFCs prevent some flex in the 'middle' of the chassis, the forces responsible for the twisting must be transfered elsewhere, right? Do you wind up subjecting other areas of the body/car to stresses not intended in the car's design? I just don't want to cure one problem but at the same time cause others.

Thanks for the help!

Bryan
Old 02-04-2004, 12:03 PM
  #2  
10 Second Fun Car
iTrader: (7)
 
jlrz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Pearland, Tx
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Just got my BMR subframe connectors on very nice fit and also strengthed it up a whole lot.
Old 02-04-2004, 12:18 PM
  #3  
TECH Fanatic
 
Dal1as's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: MD
Posts: 1,241
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I don't know of any long term problems. It may cause a bit more wear and tear on your shocks but it would be miniscule.
Old 02-04-2004, 02:36 PM
  #4  
On The Tree
 
BlackBowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 115
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I don't have too much(or any, for that matter) experience with welding. How hard is it to weld in SFC's? Also, can anyone estimate what a shop might charge to do it? Is there any cutting involved?
I had a 69 Nova with a lot of suspension work done, and I had SFC's welded in. But you had to remove the back seat and carpeting, and actually cut into the floor. That was a bit costly, but well worth it. I assume there is much less cutting, if any at all with the F-bods.
Thanks for any help.
Old 02-04-2004, 09:56 PM
  #5  
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,128
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

There is no cutting. Just take it to a frame shop.

The only draw backs I know of would be less ground clearance (not all have this problem), and the extra weight. If you're worried about transfered flex, a strut brace for the front would help. So would a cage too
Old 02-04-2004, 10:17 PM
  #6  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
Backfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wink

Originally Posted by DMNSPD
If you're worried about transfered flex, a strut brace for the front would help. So would a cage too
True, but the cage goes a little beyond my goals!! I was just concerned that if the chassis isn't allowed to flex where is did originally, where is it going to show it, if anywhere? Kinda thinking along the same lines as tall building structures where some flex is built in and expected.
Old 02-04-2004, 10:46 PM
  #7  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (6)
 
P Mack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,382
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Seems to me all the flex you would ever need is in the suspension. No need for flex in the chassis.
Old 02-05-2004, 05:47 AM
  #8  
TECH Enthusiast
 
mcflyz28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Wilmington, DE
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

choosing where to put the jack since you'll have all those extra jacking points.
Old 02-05-2004, 09:57 AM
  #9  
On The Tree
 
macool68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Florida
Posts: 124
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

extra weight, slightly reduced ground clearance, and dimples in the rear quarter panels from tearing up the corners- this may or may not be from a more rigid chasis.
Old 02-05-2004, 11:14 AM
  #10  
10 Second Club
 
B-MAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Beverly,MA
Posts: 1,897
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

There are no draw backs to subframe connectors,Install them as soon as possible. The less miles on your car the better
Old 02-05-2004, 12:14 PM
  #11  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (1)
 
gMAG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CT
Posts: 3,028
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by B-MAN
There are no draw backs to subframe connectors,Install them as soon as possible. The less miles on your car the better
B-MAN... very nice paint and effects on your vehicle! Glenn
Old 02-05-2004, 01:45 PM
  #12  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (9)
 
Fulton 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: WA
Posts: 3,326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by P Mack
Seems to me all the flex you would ever need is in the suspension. No need for flex in the chassis.
Exactly. To properly tune a suspension you should have as little chassis flex as possible.
Old 02-06-2004, 09:25 AM
  #13  
On The Tree
 
4mula1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Get the SFC's from Global West. They are thick tubular ones, and don't affect ground clearance at all. By far the best IMO.
Old 02-06-2004, 10:11 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (4)
 
tuffluck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 1,718
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i bought mine from a guy on ebay. they are the same as the global west, only 1/8" smaller in diameter (but 1/8" bigger than BMR SFC's) and they are over $100+ cheaper. made out of the exact same compounds as well.

dimples in the rear quarter panel? i've never heard of that. it must be a problem definetely not associated with SFC's.

if you have t-tops, over time, with more body flexing your chassis will bend, and thus, the tops won't fit on nearly as well, and you car will be much more prone to having leaky t-tops.

drawbacks - there are none really. your car will be a little bit stiffer ride, but i wouldn't really consider that a drawback unless you are looking for a cadillac ride
Old 02-06-2004, 10:15 AM
  #15  
TECH Resident
 
TaTommyWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 996
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Drawbacks IMO - none

They are worth the extra weight.

I went with SLP bolt-ins because I did not have a welder at the time. They worked out great. Great, easy mod.

Tommy
Old 02-06-2004, 11:10 AM
  #16  
On The Tree
 
sscamaro02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Denver,PA
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I have Spohn SFC on my 02 SS. As far as ground clearence goes, you can't even see them from the side. They are tucked behind the lip on the rocker panel. See pics:

http://community.webshots.com/user/sscamaro02
Old 02-06-2004, 01:53 PM
  #17  
TECH Apprentice
 
Debian Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chester, VA
Posts: 372
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I just got them and no matter what the draw backs the "squeaks" it took away was more than enough to make up for the added weight, etc...
Old 02-06-2004, 03:33 PM
  #18  
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,128
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by tuffluck
dimples in the rear quarter panel? i've never heard of that. it must be a problem definetely not associated with SFC's.
It usually happens without sfc's.
Old 02-07-2004, 12:29 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
 
01SSM6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i dont have access to a welder either...would just bolting them on be as good as welding?? i have thoselittle dinky dimples in my 1/4s with 24,000 and change on the odemeter...i was thinking on gettin the SLP bolt on ones..also is the hotchkis any good...and ordering the bilstein shocks all at once...finally...AWESOME lookin car SS Camaro02 i wish mine was as clean

Last edited by 01SSM6; 02-07-2004 at 12:41 PM.
Old 02-07-2004, 01:11 PM
  #20  
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,128
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 01SSM6
i dont have access to a welder either...would just bolting them on be as good as welding?? i have thoselittle dinky dimples in my 1/4s with 24,000 and change on the odemeter...i was thinking on gettin the SLP bolt on ones..also is the hotchkis any good...and ordering the bilstein shocks all at once...finally...AWESOME lookin car SS Camaro02 i wish mine was as clean
Any frame or body shop can weld them on for you. The difference in price between the bolt on and weld on ones is equal to the labor they'll charge you to put them on.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 AM.