SMP 120# injector owners please:
#1
SMP 120# injector owners please:
just changed from my ooold delphi 96# (flow tested to about 94.x#)
to smp 120's from racetronix.
after a day of tuning i have logs reporting that these injectors are flowing consistanly low.. like low low.. like they are flowing LESS than my 96ers.
all things else being equal I would like to know WTF.
happy to update with data in any which way requested.
thanks.
to smp 120's from racetronix.
after a day of tuning i have logs reporting that these injectors are flowing consistanly low.. like low low.. like they are flowing LESS than my 96ers.
all things else being equal I would like to know WTF.
happy to update with data in any which way requested.
thanks.
#5
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tested on a flowbench:
55psi static = 131lbs/hr x 10.5 = 1378 for BS3....adjust to your base pressure...should be around 1226 for your pressure
13.9v = 0.33 actual offset fired with BS3 parameters.
If 1226 and 0.33 offset doesn't work for you....something is wrong with the injectors, regulator not 1:1, pump(s) weak or not on, etc. etc...
Good luck. I hate gremlins
55psi static = 131lbs/hr x 10.5 = 1378 for BS3....adjust to your base pressure...should be around 1226 for your pressure
13.9v = 0.33 actual offset fired with BS3 parameters.
If 1226 and 0.33 offset doesn't work for you....something is wrong with the injectors, regulator not 1:1, pump(s) weak or not on, etc. etc...
Good luck. I hate gremlins
Trending Topics
#10
rained yesterday, going to give it a shot this eve.
racetronix sent me an 'interim' opening time suggestion of about .45ms at 13.9v
wish i actually ran at that much, my car is normally around 13.0 (.515ms they said to try)
but in general it is all far in the other direction of my current setting
racetronix sent me an 'interim' opening time suggestion of about .45ms at 13.9v
wish i actually ran at that much, my car is normally around 13.0 (.515ms they said to try)
but in general it is all far in the other direction of my current setting
#13
well that **** didnt work at all
the higher i moved the flowrate (from 1100 to 1250) the leaner it got (makes sense)
the lower i moved the opening time (from .9 to .3) the leaner it got (makes sense)
if i did let it try to run it would command about .4% duty cycle (or .5ms pulse) as it stalled out. (makes sense) (this was at 1200cc/min and .4ms open time)
putting the stuff back the way i had it base pulse comes up to about .9ms and 1% duty cycle. (makes sense) and everything with the idle is hunky dory. but falls way short in a hurry when you start pouring on the power.
(reasonable idle is about 38psi fuel pressure)
it all seems not not only not to improve but vastly move me in the wrong direction???
happy to send my files to anyone who wants to take a gander.
the higher i moved the flowrate (from 1100 to 1250) the leaner it got (makes sense)
the lower i moved the opening time (from .9 to .3) the leaner it got (makes sense)
if i did let it try to run it would command about .4% duty cycle (or .5ms pulse) as it stalled out. (makes sense) (this was at 1200cc/min and .4ms open time)
putting the stuff back the way i had it base pulse comes up to about .9ms and 1% duty cycle. (makes sense) and everything with the idle is hunky dory. but falls way short in a hurry when you start pouring on the power.
(reasonable idle is about 38psi fuel pressure)
it all seems not not only not to improve but vastly move me in the wrong direction???
happy to send my files to anyone who wants to take a gander.
#14
7 Second Club
iTrader: (7)
putting the stuff back the way i had it base pulse comes up to about .9ms and 1% duty cycle. (makes sense) and everything with the idle is hunky dory. but falls way short in a hurry when you start pouring on the power.
(reasonable idle is about 38psi fuel pressure)
it all seems not not only not to improve but vastly move me in the wrong direction???
happy to send my files to anyone who wants to take a gander.
(reasonable idle is about 38psi fuel pressure)
it all seems not not only not to improve but vastly move me in the wrong direction???
happy to send my files to anyone who wants to take a gander.
#15
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Did you add VE after you reset 1200 and 0.4? Fooling the cc and ms should only crutch a wrong VE table. I have more cubes which makes it easier to tune the idle...idles around 14.2 : 1 at 54psi base.
Your 543lbs at 6700 at 56%DC compares to the 96's at ????
Your 543lbs at 6700 at 56%DC compares to the 96's at ????
#18
Coal Mining Director
iTrader: (17)
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 4,442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
But with BS3 I set the injector constants based on taking an injector and having it flow tested with the BS3 P&H parameters and set the slope to what that injector actually does at the voltage/FP from the bench.
And I have always had to fiddle with the VE down low to get the correct idle.
If those injectors are +- 5% from the 96's....then they are 96's....
#19
i just drove the car around with some low boost passes with on 96# tune. its definitely within 5%
so now what do i do? send both sets of injectors somewhere to get flowed???
i am pretty sure unless i pay to have some concrete data on these injectors that racetronix will not consider taking them back.
so now what do i do? send both sets of injectors somewhere to get flowed???
i am pretty sure unless i pay to have some concrete data on these injectors that racetronix will not consider taking them back.
#20
What is your voltage @ the injector? The bigger ones are really finnicky with the amount of power they're getting and they may be only flowing as a 95# if you're only giving them like 8-9 volts. Before sending injectors away, I personally would check the voltage/amps at the injector. I know a few of my friends have Racetronix 120#'s in their cars with absolutely no problems. (Although they are running stock GM computer or AEM EMS)