Sheetmetal intakes - runners extending into plenum?
03-14-2011, 12:22 AM
#1
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Sheetmetal intakes - runners extending into plenum? In order to achieve an overall lower height profile (assuming everything is setup and built correctly) is there any disadvantage to having the runners extend right up into the plenum in orde to get 7'' length (as opposed to the runners being 7'' length but stopping at the bottom of the plenum and not going right up into it)?
e.g., like this
Worse top-range/mid/bottom power? Not an issue?
e.g., like this
Worse top-range/mid/bottom power? Not an issue?
Last edited by 2efnfast; 03-14-2011 at 12:29 AM.
03-14-2011, 12:41 PM
#4
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 100
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Very purrrrty.
So there's no give and take? I would have thought having them extend past the floor would have caused some issues (e.g., worse downlow), otherwise wouldn't most people have the runners this way in order to cut down on height?
So there's no give and take? I would have thought having them extend past the floor would have caused some issues (e.g., worse downlow), otherwise wouldn't most people have the runners this way in order to cut down on height?
03-14-2011, 07:49 PM
#6
TECH Regular
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Over Here and Over There
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
In order to achieve an overall lower height profile (assuming everything is setup and built correctly) is there any disadvantage to having the runners extend right up into the plenum in orde to get 7'' length (as opposed to the runners being 7'' length but stopping at the bottom of the plenum and not going right up into it)?
e.g., like this
Worse top-range/mid/bottom power? Not an issue?
e.g., like this
Worse top-range/mid/bottom power? Not an issue?
