Tuning at Idle - Open Vs Closed Loop
#1
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tyler, Tx
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Tuning at Idle - Open Vs Closed Loop
I've got the idle exactly where I want on startup and in open loop. Once the car warms completely up it goes into closed loop and the idle increases and sounds like timing is changing as well...
Is there a way to always command open loop when TPS @ 0% ?
Or, does anyone have any ideas? I'm no pro, but I'm having issues with tuning the idle and getting it where I want in closed loop...
Is there a way to always command open loop when TPS @ 0% ?
Or, does anyone have any ideas? I'm no pro, but I'm having issues with tuning the idle and getting it where I want in closed loop...
#2
10 Second Club
iTrader: (3)
There is a way but it only works on Vettes, not Camaros. You need to tune your O2 sensor tables, idle proportional tables, switching tables, etc in the Fueling Tab (HPT). It is a PITA, IMO, to get it right with LTs and a bigger cam so I set mine to idle in OL, but recently said screw it and just went OL full time (Vette). It actually runs much better everywhere. I'll leave it.
#3
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Commerce Twp, MI
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
If idle increases when the car is warm (beyond what is commanded in the tune), then I would look for a mechanical problem (i.e. too much airflow is being allowed into the motor either because the IAC is bottomed out or you have a vacuum leak). With higher RPMs comes a different spot in the timing map. It's possible that's the reason for the change in timing.
Closed loop is simply adjusting fuel. It shouldn't affect timing or airflow.
Closed loop is simply adjusting fuel. It shouldn't affect timing or airflow.
#5
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tyler, Tx
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just suddenly increases by about 100 rpm when it enters closed loop... it's odd, I'm still experimenting.
BTW, I'm running 44* of timing at idle currently.... no knock, very smooth...
BTW, I'm running 44* of timing at idle currently.... no knock, very smooth...
#7
TECH Fanatic
Thread Starter
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Tyler, Tx
Posts: 1,377
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Stupid question, but would not having the EGR blocked off cause this issue?
It's a decent size cam, it's a custom grind from CompCams. With the timing, fueling, etc, the lope is almost non-existent. It's been tricky to get the idle correct. But driveability is perfect... Seems like I either have way too much lope, or none at all. If I get the idle nice, then it's hard to start. It's been a real pain.
It's a decent size cam, it's a custom grind from CompCams. With the timing, fueling, etc, the lope is almost non-existent. It's been tricky to get the idle correct. But driveability is perfect... Seems like I either have way too much lope, or none at all. If I get the idle nice, then it's hard to start. It's been a real pain.
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Addict
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Commerce Twp, MI
Posts: 2,918
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Getting the car to start is more of an airflow problem more often than not. I bet that car would idle just fine near 30*. Drive-ability typically improves with less timing (specifically speaking about low airflow/low rpm scenarios). It's too much for me to try to explain at the moment. But, try an experiment in a big open parking lot driving around in 1st gear at 1500rpm. Lock the timing in at 30* the first time, then lock it in at 15* the second time. My money says the car drives smooth as butter at 15* of timing with less than 1800rpm and less than .22 grams/cyl of airflow.
#9
TECH Senior Member