Exhaust guru's step in....how is my setup?
#1
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exhaust guru's step in....how is my setup?
Ok here is the planned setup for my 404ci w/ supervic, afr225, and not to wild pat g cam.
1 7/8 custom lt headers to 3.5" collector
3.5" piping for about 2.5ft with a cutout to a boom tube
3.5" to 2.5" reducer
2.5" dynomax superturbo mufflers[longer version]
then merged into the side of the boom tube
This is per side, i currently do not have a X or H installed. If i do, i will only have space for it post cutout pre boom tube, or possibly post muffler.
1 7/8 custom lt headers to 3.5" collector
3.5" piping for about 2.5ft with a cutout to a boom tube
3.5" to 2.5" reducer
2.5" dynomax superturbo mufflers[longer version]
then merged into the side of the boom tube
This is per side, i currently do not have a X or H installed. If i do, i will only have space for it post cutout pre boom tube, or possibly post muffler.
#2
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Starting to worry that 3.5" is overkill. I figure the reduction to 2.5" capped would be fine, but onces i uncap and bypass the 2.5" im going to loose too much torque. A little loss is acceptable since im overpowered and under-weighted, but too much is a NO NO.
#3
Maybe I'm reading this wrong but that sounds like a lot of stuff to try and fit under an f-body. As far the size I think 3" duals would be sufficient. The H or X placement needs to be closer to the headers than where you are talking about placing it for it to work best.
#7
Ok gotcha... looks like a slick setup! I see no problem with it being 2.5" through the mufflers with the cutouts closed since your purpose for that is to be quiet. The 2.5" tubing will help muffle it a little more too. As far as the pipes going to the boom tubes I think 3" would be plenty and may save you some room but if you already have it planned out for 3.5" I don't see it hurting hp/tq. too much. The 3.5" pipe will make it sound a little deeper.
Trending Topics
#9
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Ok gotcha... looks like a slick setup! I see no problem with it being 2.5" through the mufflers with the cutouts closed since your purpose for that is to be quiet. The 2.5" tubing will help muffle it a little more too. As far as the pipes going to the boom tubes I think 3" would be plenty and may save you some room but if you already have it planned out for 3.5" I don't see it hurting hp/tq. too much. The 3.5" pipe will make it sound a little deeper.
I think you would be restricting that many cubes with those heads and nitrous with anything less than 3. I vote for 4.
#10
TECH Resident
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Roseville, Ca.
Posts: 843
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#11
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I should be able to fit 3.5" as everything sits now. My original plan was cutouts directly post collectors, but i had major clearance issuse. The flange was 3" from the ground with 17" rims, and im going down to 16" and possibly a lower pro tire.
What is the setup for you 4" cutout? Is it a 4" off a Y pipe?
What is the setup for you 4" cutout? Is it a 4" off a Y pipe?
#14
TECH Enthusiast
Thread Starter
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 728
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
placed my order a few hours ago, i'll post a sound clip on my build thread if anyone wants to hear it.
https://ls1tech.com/forums/conversio...ker-build.html
https://ls1tech.com/forums/conversio...ker-build.html