General LSX Automobile Discussion Non-technical LSX related topics.

1995/96 corvette or ls1 trans am/camaro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-06-2011, 07:53 PM
  #1  
Teching In
Thread Starter
 
BMWLS1FAN's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 1995/96 corvette or ls1 trans am/camaro

I have a chance at buying a 1995/96 corvette or an ls1 trans am/camaro. What is the advantages or disadvantages of each one. Which one would handle better with the best suspension on each one, which rides smoothest, what is the difference between 0-60 and 1/4 mile. Which would be better or cheaper to mod?
Old 07-06-2011, 08:01 PM
  #2  
TECH Regular
 
why87's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Piqua,OH
Posts: 430
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

f body is cheaper to mod by a long shot.
Old 07-06-2011, 08:06 PM
  #3  
TECH Senior Member
iTrader: (4)
 
ULTIMATEORANGESS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: eatontown,nj
Posts: 10,976
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 15 Posts

Smile

plus an ls1 will make more power.
Old 07-07-2011, 04:38 AM
  #4  
Staging Lane
iTrader: (1)
 
Bugsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 59
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

As previously stated, the F-Body will be cheaper to mod than the Vette. If you're intent on getting a Vette, however, forget those LT1 models and go for a C5. My first Z28 was a '93, and I added an LT4 top end and a turbo kit, and I loved it, but the LS1 simply makes more power mod for mod.
Old 07-07-2011, 09:42 AM
  #5  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Benjamin Russick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

The late C4s were very good cars as they had most of the bugs worked out and are formidable in stock form to this day. However, the LSx is a far better engine overall and the F-body will be far cheaper to modify. Neither will ride smoothly and both can be made to handle extremely well.
Old 07-07-2011, 10:09 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
NC98Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,306
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

They started putting LS1s in vettes in 97. I don't care for the LT1s in either vechile.
Old 07-07-2011, 10:17 AM
  #7  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (18)
 
thunderstruck507's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest AR
Posts: 8,357
Received 21 Likes on 17 Posts

Default

C4 Corvettes are very dated to me. I can't stand them.

The fbody will be both faster and cheaper to mod anyway.
Old 07-07-2011, 12:45 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
 
TransAmWS.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,313
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts

Default

Yeah, I would go for the F-Body, wouldn't even consider a C4 over one. Like previously stated, it's going to be cheaper to mod and it's generally going to respond better to those mods as well. Now, a C5 would be a different story but those cars seems to be in a different price range when compared to the LS1 F-Body's and C4's.
Old 07-07-2011, 01:40 PM
  #9  
TECH Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Kurt D's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pineville, La
Posts: 487
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

The C4 has an advantage if you want it to handle. Like everyone said though, the LS1 f-bodies will make more power, be cheaper to mod, respond better to mods and can be setup to give the C4 a run for it's money in the handling dept as well.

Honestly, if I were serious about a vette on a budget I'd look at a higher mileage, early C5. I've seen some in the low teens dollar wise. Same power as the LS1 f-bodies, responds the same to mods, will handle better and will be better built. Only down side is the "vette tax" on parts.
Old 07-07-2011, 01:45 PM
  #10  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (9)
 
82cetuner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Denham Springs, LA
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts

Default

vettes definetly are expensive I should know. Engine wise on a ls1 or lt1 you can buy the f body varient but when it comes to clutches, suspension and things like that they are far for expensive
Old 07-07-2011, 04:57 PM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Camaro_94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I'd go with the LS1 F-body...
Old 07-07-2011, 08:57 PM
  #12  
Staging Lane
 
ineedals1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: aurora, colorado
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

WS6 or SS? if so then hands down the ls1
Old 07-07-2011, 09:23 PM
  #13  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (41)
 
senicalj4579's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,257
Received 22 Likes on 20 Posts

Default

get a ls1 over the other.
Old 07-07-2011, 10:58 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (2)
 
StuntmanMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Newport, RI
Posts: 1,406
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I've driven a C4 Vette, and I'll take my F-Body over it any day.

Yeah, it doesn't have prestige of saying you own a Vette, but it's a better car.

Maybe it was just the particular C4 I drive, a '93, but that thing was horrible...I thought the F-Body rode bad, this thing was so stiff the car sounded like it was going to shake itself to pieces. Also the interior looks cool from adistance, but very dated once you get inside it, and with the hugely wide and tall door sills, it's a PITA to get in and out of.

I was kind of sad actually...I was test driving it because I was thinking of buying a C4 at the time, bu that car soured me on the whole idea. I went back to looking for an F-Body and bought my Formula shortly after.

Unless it was a ZR1, a '96 Gran Sport LT4 or Special Edition LT4 (all were silver, IIRC), I wouldn't even consider a C4 over any LS1 F-Body.

It's cool to be able to say you own a Vette, and I actually like the look of the later C4's, but other than that, I don't think they're that great a car.

Like what was said above, I'd take a high mileage C5 over a C4 anyday too. C5's are coming down in price, you should be able to get one for around the same price as a really clean WS6.
Old 07-08-2011, 09:36 AM
  #15  
TECH Junkie
iTrader: (6)
 
MonmouthCtyLS7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rotonda West Florida
Posts: 3,955
Received 30 Likes on 27 Posts

Default

LS1 all the way
Old 07-08-2011, 09:46 AM
  #16  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (5)
 
Camaro_94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,450
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

LS1 C5's are dropping in value too. A friend just bought a 2000 M6 vert with 100k miles for $13,000
Old 07-09-2011, 10:05 PM
  #17  
TECH Enthusiast
 
JHL88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: SC
Posts: 535
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

i can't stand c4 vettes. ls1 ftw performance and cosmetic wise
Old 07-09-2011, 11:20 PM
  #18  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (3)
 
killagt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,737
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

if it a newer vet, i do go, but 95-96 model, I go with ls1 T/A camaro.
Old 07-13-2011, 06:32 PM
  #19  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (11)
 
Red99TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Topeka, KS
Posts: 2,423
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default

Definitely the LS1. If you can I'd go for a C5 though. The only mods that have the vette tax apply really are the headers, X pipe, catback, rear end, and suspension parts. All your other power mods will be about the same as an f-bod.



Quick Reply: 1995/96 corvette or ls1 trans am/camaro



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:12 PM.