1sicss

iTrader: (3)

With the trap that I hit with a horrible 2.3 60ft. spinning, assuning that I plant all the power to the floor and not spinning what would be some possible times with my trap speed. I think I could possibly get a mph or two more out of it not spinning as bad as I did. Anyways pretty proud of myself did the whole camswap by myself and everything that has been done on the car. I knew when I turned the car on went through the heat cycles for the springs and palyed with it here and there I knew I'd have a traction issue from the result of such a marvelous bumpstick. Hats off to TSP for being such a great company.

1sicss

iTrader: (3)

out of curiousity what are other people trapping with Torquer V2 stock heads and boltons?

thunderstruck507

iTrader: (18)

MPH will stay the same or get lower with traction, not higher.

1sicss

iTrader: (3)

I still think I can do better cause if you think about how far I spun down the track the rpm's are higher then drop down upon traction then climb their way back up and if I spin less in the beginning it will allow the rpm's higher in the rpm band down the track. I could be wrong but I think it may have a mph or two left. I DON'T KNOW.

PREDATOR-Z

I've done 122 myself, years ago when I ran a 232/234 113lsa

95FbFormula

iTrader: (25)

What was the ET why so focused on MPH boosted cars run high mph all the time but lower ets my friends gst eclipse went 15 at 107 mph and his 396 monsa went 11 at 88 mph both passes had problems though

Detoxx03

iTrader: (14)

Might trap lower with better traction