Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

Reasons to not go rear mount / Critique my plan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-15-2011, 10:42 AM
  #1  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Ryanbgb22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default Reasons to not go rear mount / Critique my plan

I'm thinking about doing a low boost, budget rear mount build this winter.

Some background:
200,000 mile stock ls1
stock 4l60e
stock 10 bolt

Turbo/Engine
-on3 76mm journal bearing turbo
-ebay 38 or 40mm wastegate with .25 bar spring (~4psi)
-ebay blow off valve
-ebay intercooler
-aftermarket valve springs
-aftermarket push rods
-new timing chain and sprockets
-stock fuel supply for now including injectors
-obviously some sort of oil return pump

Piping
-2 3/4" stainless piping from the stock 'y' to the turbo
-2.5" cold side piping


This will be my first major fabrication project, and it seems simpler to go this route than front mount (less tight clearances). I do understand I am on borrowed time with the engine / transmission / rear at this point, but I'm not too concerned about that. I have an lm7 long block in my possession that I intend doing a bigger build with in the future.

Basically, I will be using this project as a learning experience and to get my feet wet in the world of boost.

I'm looking for any recommendations with my setup, other builds to look at, etc.
Old 11-15-2011, 10:54 AM
  #2  
On The Tree
 
3800SII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 187
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ryanbgb22
I'm thinking about doing a low boost, budget rear mount build this winter.

Some background:
200,000 mile stock ls1
stock 4l60e
stock 10 bolt

Turbo/Engine
-on3 76mm journal bearing turbo
-ebay 38 or 40mm wastegate with .25 bar spring (~4psi)
-ebay blow off valve
-ebay intercooler
-aftermarket valve springs
-aftermarket push rods
-new timing chain and sprockets
-stock fuel supply for now including injectors
-obviously some sort of oil return pump

Piping
-2 3/4" stainless piping from the stock 'y' to the turbo
-2.5" cold side piping


This will be my first major fabrication project, and it seems simpler to go this route than front mount (less tight clearances). I do understand I am on borrowed time with the engine / transmission / rear at this point, but I'm not too concerned about that. I have an lm7 long block in my possession that I intend doing a bigger build with in the future.

Basically, I will be using this project as a learning experience and to get my feet wet in the world of boost.

I'm looking for any recommendations with my setup, other builds to look at, etc.
Maybe 2.5 exhaust from the Y to the turbo, or it will be more laggy.
Old 11-15-2011, 10:56 AM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (14)
 
RooRnZ28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Central California
Posts: 1,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Your stock 4L60E will need to be upgraded. There is no borrowed time with that, it won't last more that a week.
Old 11-15-2011, 05:27 PM
  #4  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (118)
 
xxrillixx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 663
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I love my rearmount. And i dont have any of the issues my friends with front mounts do. Car still spools super fast. You'll love it.

Only Con I can think of is all the extra piping is more weight. But i like having the pretty much stock looking engine bay, no heat issues, and I have to have AC.


Im not sure which is going to go first, but id put my money on the trans. lol Be ready to start breaking stuff!
Old 11-16-2011, 06:36 AM
  #5  
Staging Lane
Thread Starter
 
Ryanbgb22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

I'm surprised there is so little hope in the trans. I wasn't expecting it to last long, but I thought I could get a season of lightly spirited driving out of it. I guess I'll start looking for a built 4l60e or 4l80e, or mabye go the TH route. I'm going to start with the stock trans either way, I guess I will just come up with a backup plan for when it goes.

I should be fine with stock injectors and stock fuel pump at 4psi correct?
Old 11-16-2011, 07:08 AM
  #6  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
got-a-ls1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

4l60 gets a **** rep. guess thats what happens when gm has produced probably a billion of them, you see a lot more failures and people bitching. i put my 4l60e through hell over 25 passes at the track on the 100 shot (and way over 100 passes on motor at the track on et streets)and the trans was fine. ofcourse putting over 500 horsepower at the tires in a 3700 pound race weight with 3.23 gears means it would be on borrowed time. it had 100,000 miles on it anyway, but you know what? trans was still fine when i spun a rod bearing.

oh and i did probably a WOT 4th gear to second gear on the highway ALL the time (daily)which supposedly kills these transmissions. probably have done that way over 1000 times since ive owned the car for 6 years.

run it.. be smart with it, realize its a stock transmission
Old 11-16-2011, 12:54 PM
  #7  
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
willizm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by Ryanbgb22
I'm surprised there is so little hope in the trans. I wasn't expecting it to last long, but I thought I could get a season of lightly spirited driving out of it. I guess I'll start looking for a built 4l60e or 4l80e, or mabye go the TH route. I'm going to start with the stock trans either way, I guess I will just come up with a backup plan for when it goes.

I should be fine with stock injectors and stock fuel pump at 4psi correct?
I preemptively had my 4l60e built buy FLT(level 6) as I didn't want to get the thing running only to have it go on me. If I could do it again, I might have just ponnied up the money for a built 4l80e with a trans brake. The 4l60e when built seems to handle pretty good, but hell if I know how long it will hold up. If it goes, I'll go with the 4l80e then. Don't want a TH400 as this is a primarily street driven car so I'd like an overdrive considering I hav 3.73's.
Old 11-16-2011, 02:00 PM
  #8  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (47)
 
89LS1FOXER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Exa oil return pump and run a 1 ps1 cracking check valve in the oil feed line, got mine from granger. Keep the cross over 2.5" as said above, heat wrap as much as you can to keep the heat in and exhaust velocity up!
Old 11-16-2011, 04:52 PM
  #9  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
 
JRENIGAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: 72396
Posts: 2,069
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by got-a-ls1
4l60 gets a **** rep. guess thats what happens when gm has produced probably a billion of them, you see a lot more failures and people bitching. i put my 4l60e through hell over 25 passes at the track on the 100 shot (and way over 100 passes on motor at the track on et streets)and the trans was fine. ofcourse putting over 500 horsepower at the tires in a 3700 pound race weight with 3.23 gears means it would be on borrowed time. it had 100,000 miles on it anyway, but you know what? trans was still fine when i spun a rod bearing.

oh and i did probably a WOT 4th gear to second gear on the highway ALL the time (daily)which supposedly kills these transmissions. probably have done that way over 1000 times since ive owned the car for 6 years.

run it.. be smart with it, realize its a stock transmission
Exactly... My setup has 187k on it and everything is stock; Motor, Trans, and 3.23 geared rearend. It's had the blower on it for 15k miles or so. I also do 4th to 2nd kickdowns almost daily. Like already mentioned, Be smart and realize its a stock high mile setup and go from there. I shift @ 6000rpm, Might be the reason its all still together with that many miles on it. Tme will tell as I fully expect it to make 250k. Im a firm believer in a good safe dyno tune going a long way towards making **** last. Id rather give up 20hp or so in the tune for 50k miles of fun driving than have a rod knocking or slung through the block....
Old 11-16-2011, 08:01 PM
  #10  
On The Tree
 
pber13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

the only thing that stands out to me is the ebay wastegate (since you didn't specify a brand). not something to go bargain bin on IMO. spend the money on a good unit.
Old 11-16-2011, 08:49 PM
  #11  
Staging Lane
 
sams02Z28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: christiana pa
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Gut/remove cats..don't wanna take a chance on havin one blow any type of **** out of it and runnin through your turbo!!
Old 01-05-2012, 10:25 AM
  #12  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
T76s10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: superior, wi
Posts: 1,202
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I heard emusa's 38mm gate works pretty well. In my opinion, I would try to do front mount. Less piping, no oil return pump, and I read somewhere that more heat keeps velocity up so not only spoiling faster you'll make more hp per boost. Some guy said his customers make about 30hp per boost with frontmount and like 20hp per boost on rear mount but i cant confirm this. On the other hand, you'll need to do more fabricating with a frontmount and you need to wrap all piping up with header wrap to keep the heat in and space is very limited. Although sts systems make great hp and as xxrillixx stated his spools pretty quick. Either way, throwing boost at anything is going to be a hell of a blast and each set up will make good hp numbers.
Old 01-06-2012, 01:07 PM
  #13  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
 
mconway68w's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Dynomax has a direct fit catless y pipe. Mine works great with the stock manifolds. Make sure you wrap it from the y back. I'm making about 9#s of boost with my sts and the stock 4l60 and 10 bolt are still strong. Of course I'm only running 2.73s
Old 06-27-2012, 06:39 AM
  #14  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (2)
 
JoshuaGrooms83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Locust Grove, VA
Posts: 2,022
Received 95 Likes on 81 Posts

Default

what numbers are you making cause thats almost my exact setup i have right now, minus the dynomax ypipe
Old 06-27-2012, 07:58 AM
  #15  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
MrMixnMatch's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mobile, AL
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Catch can.

Also it wouldn't hurt to AT LEAST replace the seals in your trans/rear, just in case.
Old 06-27-2012, 08:44 AM
  #16  
On The Tree
iTrader: (1)
 
simplysix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Westminster, CO
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Just do a front mount. Less piping, no oil return pump that could fail, turbo is not sitting out in the elements, and there are kits that still let you keep a/c.



Quick Reply: Reasons to not go rear mount / Critique my plan



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:19 PM.