Reasons to not go rear mount / Critique my plan
#1
Reasons to not go rear mount / Critique my plan
I'm thinking about doing a low boost, budget rear mount build this winter.
Some background:
200,000 mile stock ls1
stock 4l60e
stock 10 bolt
Turbo/Engine
-on3 76mm journal bearing turbo
-ebay 38 or 40mm wastegate with .25 bar spring (~4psi)
-ebay blow off valve
-ebay intercooler
-aftermarket valve springs
-aftermarket push rods
-new timing chain and sprockets
-stock fuel supply for now including injectors
-obviously some sort of oil return pump
Piping
-2 3/4" stainless piping from the stock 'y' to the turbo
-2.5" cold side piping
This will be my first major fabrication project, and it seems simpler to go this route than front mount (less tight clearances). I do understand I am on borrowed time with the engine / transmission / rear at this point, but I'm not too concerned about that. I have an lm7 long block in my possession that I intend doing a bigger build with in the future.
Basically, I will be using this project as a learning experience and to get my feet wet in the world of boost.
I'm looking for any recommendations with my setup, other builds to look at, etc.
Some background:
200,000 mile stock ls1
stock 4l60e
stock 10 bolt
Turbo/Engine
-on3 76mm journal bearing turbo
-ebay 38 or 40mm wastegate with .25 bar spring (~4psi)
-ebay blow off valve
-ebay intercooler
-aftermarket valve springs
-aftermarket push rods
-new timing chain and sprockets
-stock fuel supply for now including injectors
-obviously some sort of oil return pump
Piping
-2 3/4" stainless piping from the stock 'y' to the turbo
-2.5" cold side piping
This will be my first major fabrication project, and it seems simpler to go this route than front mount (less tight clearances). I do understand I am on borrowed time with the engine / transmission / rear at this point, but I'm not too concerned about that. I have an lm7 long block in my possession that I intend doing a bigger build with in the future.
Basically, I will be using this project as a learning experience and to get my feet wet in the world of boost.
I'm looking for any recommendations with my setup, other builds to look at, etc.
#2
I'm thinking about doing a low boost, budget rear mount build this winter.
Some background:
200,000 mile stock ls1
stock 4l60e
stock 10 bolt
Turbo/Engine
-on3 76mm journal bearing turbo
-ebay 38 or 40mm wastegate with .25 bar spring (~4psi)
-ebay blow off valve
-ebay intercooler
-aftermarket valve springs
-aftermarket push rods
-new timing chain and sprockets
-stock fuel supply for now including injectors
-obviously some sort of oil return pump
Piping
-2 3/4" stainless piping from the stock 'y' to the turbo
-2.5" cold side piping
This will be my first major fabrication project, and it seems simpler to go this route than front mount (less tight clearances). I do understand I am on borrowed time with the engine / transmission / rear at this point, but I'm not too concerned about that. I have an lm7 long block in my possession that I intend doing a bigger build with in the future.
Basically, I will be using this project as a learning experience and to get my feet wet in the world of boost.
I'm looking for any recommendations with my setup, other builds to look at, etc.
Some background:
200,000 mile stock ls1
stock 4l60e
stock 10 bolt
Turbo/Engine
-on3 76mm journal bearing turbo
-ebay 38 or 40mm wastegate with .25 bar spring (~4psi)
-ebay blow off valve
-ebay intercooler
-aftermarket valve springs
-aftermarket push rods
-new timing chain and sprockets
-stock fuel supply for now including injectors
-obviously some sort of oil return pump
Piping
-2 3/4" stainless piping from the stock 'y' to the turbo
-2.5" cold side piping
This will be my first major fabrication project, and it seems simpler to go this route than front mount (less tight clearances). I do understand I am on borrowed time with the engine / transmission / rear at this point, but I'm not too concerned about that. I have an lm7 long block in my possession that I intend doing a bigger build with in the future.
Basically, I will be using this project as a learning experience and to get my feet wet in the world of boost.
I'm looking for any recommendations with my setup, other builds to look at, etc.
#4
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (118)
I love my rearmount. And i dont have any of the issues my friends with front mounts do. Car still spools super fast. You'll love it.
Only Con I can think of is all the extra piping is more weight. But i like having the pretty much stock looking engine bay, no heat issues, and I have to have AC.
Im not sure which is going to go first, but id put my money on the trans. lol Be ready to start breaking stuff!
Only Con I can think of is all the extra piping is more weight. But i like having the pretty much stock looking engine bay, no heat issues, and I have to have AC.
Im not sure which is going to go first, but id put my money on the trans. lol Be ready to start breaking stuff!
#5
I'm surprised there is so little hope in the trans. I wasn't expecting it to last long, but I thought I could get a season of lightly spirited driving out of it. I guess I'll start looking for a built 4l60e or 4l80e, or mabye go the TH route. I'm going to start with the stock trans either way, I guess I will just come up with a backup plan for when it goes.
I should be fine with stock injectors and stock fuel pump at 4psi correct?
I should be fine with stock injectors and stock fuel pump at 4psi correct?
#6
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: earth
Posts: 1,438
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
4l60 gets a **** rep. guess thats what happens when gm has produced probably a billion of them, you see a lot more failures and people bitching. i put my 4l60e through hell over 25 passes at the track on the 100 shot (and way over 100 passes on motor at the track on et streets)and the trans was fine. ofcourse putting over 500 horsepower at the tires in a 3700 pound race weight with 3.23 gears means it would be on borrowed time. it had 100,000 miles on it anyway, but you know what? trans was still fine when i spun a rod bearing.
oh and i did probably a WOT 4th gear to second gear on the highway ALL the time (daily)which supposedly kills these transmissions. probably have done that way over 1000 times since ive owned the car for 6 years.
run it.. be smart with it, realize its a stock transmission
oh and i did probably a WOT 4th gear to second gear on the highway ALL the time (daily)which supposedly kills these transmissions. probably have done that way over 1000 times since ive owned the car for 6 years.
run it.. be smart with it, realize its a stock transmission
#7
9 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Joliet,IL and Las Vegas 50/50
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes
on
3 Posts
I'm surprised there is so little hope in the trans. I wasn't expecting it to last long, but I thought I could get a season of lightly spirited driving out of it. I guess I'll start looking for a built 4l60e or 4l80e, or mabye go the TH route. I'm going to start with the stock trans either way, I guess I will just come up with a backup plan for when it goes.
I should be fine with stock injectors and stock fuel pump at 4psi correct?
I should be fine with stock injectors and stock fuel pump at 4psi correct?
Trending Topics
#8
TECH Resident
iTrader: (47)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Aurora, CO
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Exa oil return pump and run a 1 ps1 cracking check valve in the oil feed line, got mine from granger. Keep the cross over 2.5" as said above, heat wrap as much as you can to keep the heat in and exhaust velocity up!
#9
10 Second Club
iTrader: (37)
4l60 gets a **** rep. guess thats what happens when gm has produced probably a billion of them, you see a lot more failures and people bitching. i put my 4l60e through hell over 25 passes at the track on the 100 shot (and way over 100 passes on motor at the track on et streets)and the trans was fine. ofcourse putting over 500 horsepower at the tires in a 3700 pound race weight with 3.23 gears means it would be on borrowed time. it had 100,000 miles on it anyway, but you know what? trans was still fine when i spun a rod bearing.
oh and i did probably a WOT 4th gear to second gear on the highway ALL the time (daily)which supposedly kills these transmissions. probably have done that way over 1000 times since ive owned the car for 6 years.
run it.. be smart with it, realize its a stock transmission
oh and i did probably a WOT 4th gear to second gear on the highway ALL the time (daily)which supposedly kills these transmissions. probably have done that way over 1000 times since ive owned the car for 6 years.
run it.. be smart with it, realize its a stock transmission
#12
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
I heard emusa's 38mm gate works pretty well. In my opinion, I would try to do front mount. Less piping, no oil return pump, and I read somewhere that more heat keeps velocity up so not only spoiling faster you'll make more hp per boost. Some guy said his customers make about 30hp per boost with frontmount and like 20hp per boost on rear mount but i cant confirm this. On the other hand, you'll need to do more fabricating with a frontmount and you need to wrap all piping up with header wrap to keep the heat in and space is very limited. Although sts systems make great hp and as xxrillixx stated his spools pretty quick. Either way, throwing boost at anything is going to be a hell of a blast and each set up will make good hp numbers.
#13
11 Second Club
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Shreveport, LA
Posts: 127
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Dynomax has a direct fit catless y pipe. Mine works great with the stock manifolds. Make sure you wrap it from the y back. I'm making about 9#s of boost with my sts and the stock 4l60 and 10 bolt are still strong. Of course I'm only running 2.73s