Forced Induction Superchargers | Turbochargers | Intercoolers

364 cu in, AFR 225's or 235's?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-07-2011, 02:04 PM
  #1  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
01 blue ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default 364 cu in, AFR 225's or 235's?

I am trying to decide on the heads to put on my motor. I know I want to be able to upgrade so I am thinking of going 235's but I don't know if that is going to hurt me.

I know 98z28cobrakiller runs the 225's on his 370, plus since this is a boosted application I don't think a 10 cc runner difference is going to matter.

I plan on building a 427 down the road and upping the turbo size so I'm figuring on getting the 235's so they can go on the next motor. Let me know what you guys think.
Old 12-07-2011, 10:40 PM
  #2  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (2)
 
Boo"SS"t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: somewhere in Ohio
Posts: 785
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

If I remember correctly, the AFR 225's has been replaced by the new 230's. But if you're planning on building a 427 anytime soon, then you might want to go with their 245's.
Old 12-07-2011, 10:46 PM
  #3  
10 Second Club
iTrader: (10)
 
Fbodyjunkie06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Greensboro, NC
Posts: 4,712
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

New 230's sound like the right choice being smack in the middle of what you were looking at.
Old 12-08-2011, 10:29 AM
  #4  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
01 blue ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I just sent an e-mail to AFR also to see what they think.
Old 12-08-2011, 05:37 PM
  #5  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (13)
 
venom ws7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: EARTH
Posts: 5,967
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I Already asked Tony about the same thing for my 347ci and going 400+ci in the future
He told me 230 will work for both setups with slight hand port/work by him.
Old 12-08-2011, 07:42 PM
  #6  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by venom ws7
I Already asked Tony about the same thing for my 347ci and going 400+ci in the future
He told me 230 will work for both setups with slight hand port/work by him.
That's a different question though as you are using a 3.9 bore. The 245 would be way too tight in there. I spent some time with Tony Mamo at the PRI Show last week and he really wants to put me in a 245 for my 4.030 bore 370ci motor. The only problem is that he wont GIVE me an evaluation pair.
Old 12-08-2011, 08:25 PM
  #7  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
01 blue ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 98Z28CobraKiller
That's a different question though as you are using a 3.9 bore. The 245 would be way too tight in there. I spent some time with Tony Mamo at the PRI Show last week and he really wants to put me in a 245 for my 4.030 bore 370ci motor. The only problem is that he wont GIVE me an evaluation pair.
Thats the same thing he told me in my email or the guy who works there named J Patrick.

I would recommend a set of our 245cc Mongoose heads. We spend hundredsof hours in research and development making small changes in order toachieve maximum power and this extra time taken during machining allowsus to produce a closer replica of those prototypes. Your specificcombination would be able to harness the power potential of these heads.If you take the time to compare our heads with our competitors, payattention to not only the peak flow numbers but also with flow ratingsthroughout the valve lift. If you have any further questions, don'thesitate to contact me. I look forward to hearing from you in the futureand helping you to place your order.



Also, venom ws7 is talking about a 230 head which they make a small and big bore for.
Old 12-08-2011, 11:54 PM
  #8  
Flow Wizard
iTrader: (13)
 
Tony Mamo @ AFR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,197
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by 98Z28CobraKiller
The only problem is that he wont GIVE me an evaluation pair.
If you looked like the girl in the Turbonetics booth last year we might have been able to work something out!! (AND she rows the gears in a nine second car....LOL)

Guys....someone alerted me to this thread.....besides the quick fun with Carlos above I had to add that you can not run a 245 head on a 347 or a 383 for that matter....you need a minimum bore of 4" to fit the larger intake valve. I don't even think you could physically install a 245 head on a 3.900 bore combination and not have the intake valve slightly clip the side of the bore (it will fit in an LS2 block or larger though).

Bottom line a new 230 is the head of choice for the OP's application.....if he has the funds a Mamofied version of that head with a lightweight intake valve is probably worth an additional 30-40 RWHP under boost...even more on a higher RPM heavily boosted combo where the additional airflow and better valve control will really pay you dividends but if the budget doesn't allow that an out of the box AFR V2 230 is hard to beat.

Hope this helps....

OP, feel free to PM pr call if you need additional info



Regards,
Tony
661-705-8508
Old 12-09-2011, 06:02 AM
  #9  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
01 blue ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
If you looked like the girl in the Turbonetics booth last year we might have been able to work something out!! (AND she rows the gears in a nine second car....LOL)

Guys....someone alerted me to this thread.....besides the quick fun with Carlos above I had to add that you can not run a 245 head on a 347 or a 383 for that matter....you need a minimum bore of 4" to fit the larger intake valve. I don't even think you could physically install a 245 head on a 3.900 bore combination and not have the intake valve slightly clip the side of the bore (it will fit in an LS2 block or larger though).

Bottom line a new 230 is the head of choice for the OP's application.....if he has the funds a Mamofied version of that head with a lightweight intake valve is probably worth an additional 30-40 RWHP under boost...even more on a higher RPM heavily boosted combo where the additional airflow and better valve control will really pay you dividends but if the budget doesn't allow that an out of the box AFR V2 230 is hard to beat.

Hope this helps....

OP, feel free to PM pr call if you need additional info



Regards,
Tony
661-705-8508
Will do Tony, I'll give you a call.
Old 12-09-2011, 08:53 AM
  #10  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tony Mamo @ AFR
If you looked like the girl in the Turbonetics booth last year we might have been able to work something out!! (AND she rows the gears in a nine second car....LOL)

Guys....someone alerted me to this thread.....besides the quick fun with Carlos above I had to add that you can not run a 245 head on a 347 or a 383 for that matter....you need a minimum bore of 4" to fit the larger intake valve. I don't even think you could physically install a 245 head on a 3.900 bore combination and not have the intake valve slightly clip the side of the bore (it will fit in an LS2 block or larger though).

Bottom line a new 230 is the head of choice for the OP's application.....if he has the funds a Mamofied version of that head with a lightweight intake valve is probably worth an additional 30-40 RWHP under boost...even more on a higher RPM heavily boosted combo where the additional airflow and better valve control will really pay you dividends but if the budget doesn't allow that an out of the box AFR V2 230 is hard to beat.

Hope this helps....

OP, feel free to PM pr call if you need additional info



Regards,
Tony
661-705-8508
COME ON MAN! Help a bortha out over here. I can sell these things for you. How about, buy one get one free?

And for those wondering who was in the Turbonetics booth at PRI in 2010, it was Jessica Barton.


And Tony, she's upgraded the bolt-ons since then.

Well, next time I hurt my heads, you'll have me over a barrel (just how you want me ) because these heads can be shaved no more.

Good to see ya.
Old 12-09-2011, 10:02 AM
  #11  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
AutomagicLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shawnee,KS
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

I bought AFR's simply for the fact that they have a thicker deck which will help keep the heads down @ big power. I really doubt the power is that drastic between 317 heads and AFR's when you are cramming 20+lbs through the motor

Last edited by AutomagicLS1; 12-09-2011 at 10:07 AM.
Old 12-09-2011, 10:26 AM
  #12  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
01 blue ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AutomagicLS1
I bought AFR's simply for the fact that they have a thicker deck which will help keep the heads down @ big power. I really doubt the power is that drastic between 317 heads and AFR's when you are cramming 20+lbs through the motor
I really doubt that one. Psi is a measure of flow resistance. 20 psi against a .062 nitrous jet and a .093 nitrous jet is still 20 psi, but which flows more?

Secondly, lets say I had 2 boxes that were 10 cubic ft and pressurize them to 20 psiand I had those same nitrous jets, one on each box and I hit the solenoid on them. The bigger jet would empty first. So in essence I could drop the pressure in the bigger jet box and empty it out in the same amount of time as the smaller jet box.

So in motor terms If I had 317 heads on my motor and swapped them to some AFR's of TFS heads, I would most likely see a pressure drop but run just as fast as I did before or faster because i made the engine more efficient.

Third, I don't think Los would still run an 8.98 if he swapped out his AFR225's for some 317's
Old 12-09-2011, 10:31 AM
  #13  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
01 blue ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 98Z28CobraKiller
COME ON MAN! Help a bortha out over here. I can sell these things for you. How about, buy one get one free?

And for those wondering who was in the Turbonetics booth at PRI in 2010, it was Jessica Barton.


And Tony, she's upgraded the bolt-ons since then.

Well, next time I hurt my heads, you'll have me over a barrel (just how you want me ) because these heads can be shaved no more.

Good to see ya.


On a lighter note, this wouldn't happen to be the same chick, Los and Tony

https://ls1tech.com/forums/15697112-post20.html
Old 12-09-2011, 10:43 AM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
AutomagicLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Shawnee,KS
Posts: 1,429
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by 01 blue ss
I really doubt that one. Psi is a measure of flow resistance. 20 psi against a .062 nitrous jet and a .093 nitrous jet is still 20 psi, but which flows more?

Secondly, lets say I had 2 boxes that were 10 cubic ft and pressurize them to 20 psiand I had those same nitrous jets, one on each box and I hit the solenoid on them. The bigger jet would empty first. So in essence I could drop the pressure in the bigger jet box and empty it out in the same amount of time as the smaller jet box.

So in motor terms If I had 317 heads on my motor and swapped them to some AFR's of TFS heads, I would most likely see a pressure drop but run just as fast as I did before or faster because i made the engine more efficient.

Third, I don't think Los would still run an 8.98 if he swapped out his AFR225's for some 317's
So how much power do you think? I guess if one is on a budget do you spend ~$2K on heads or add a little more boost?
Old 12-09-2011, 10:50 AM
  #15  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
01 blue ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by AutomagicLS1
So how much power do you think? I guess if one is on a budget do you spend ~$2K on heads or add a little more boost?
Thats a good question. The real answer would be, keep the boost to a minimum and save $3500 for the better heads.

Lets say you know your internals are bulletproof and they can handle 30 psi without issue.

So you are now running 30psi with 317 heads and making 11xx hp. Wouldn't you rather run 25psi and make the same hp? Then be able to turn up the boost to 30psi and make 12xx or 13xx hp.

Don't get me wrong I am all about the budget, but there is also the saying "you gotta pay to play".
Old 12-09-2011, 02:31 PM
  #16  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01 blue ss
On a lighter note, this wouldn't happen to be the same chick, Los and Tony

https://ls1tech.com/forums/15697112-post20.html
One and the same. And, she has a twin that is not identical but similar and also very hot.
Old 12-09-2011, 02:49 PM
  #17  
Restricted User
iTrader: (17)
 
98Z28CobraKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: WPB, FL
Posts: 5,783
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by AutomagicLS1
So how much power do you think? I guess if one is on a budget do you spend ~$2K on heads or add a little more boost?
The first problem is keeping a set of stock heads clamped down over 800 rwhp.

The second thing is that you are looking at it from the wrong end. Look at it as a naturally aspirated setup. If an aftermarket head is good for 40 rwhp (not uncommon) on a NA setup, at double the atmospheric pressure (15 psi) it should be good for double the gains (80 rwhp). You could just run more boost to compensate but remember that more boost is typically more heat, takes more time to build and the turbo does have a finite amount of boost that it will make on a setup.

It really boils down to what you are doing. Some guys build a 400+ cube $5K motor, put $3K worth of heads on it and another $3k worth of turbo in order to run 800-1000 rwhp a couple of times a year on a dyno and never go down the track. For them, yes, it's a waste of money. But if you are building a combo to squeeze everything out of it on the drag strip, then you have to pony up for the good heads at some point or another.
Old 12-09-2011, 06:26 PM
  #18  
Teching In
iTrader: (3)
 
supragrl93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: orlando
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 01 blue ss
On a lighter note, this wouldn't happen to be the same chick, Los and Tony

https://ls1tech.com/forums/15697112-post20.html
yep yep, and yikes for the big girl pic! I learned to workout shortly after those pics were taken
Old 12-09-2011, 08:08 PM
  #19  
On The Tree
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
01 blue ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 179
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by supragrl93
yep yep, and yikes for the big girl pic! I learned to workout shortly after those pics were taken
Trust me you do not need to work out. Some of us like a girl with curves
Old 12-25-2011, 11:54 PM
  #20  
TECH Resident
iTrader: (6)
 
firefighter813x's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post

Default

Originally Posted by supragrl93
yep yep, and yikes for the big girl pic! I learned to workout shortly after those pics were taken
You're crazy! You look great. My girl friend has a similar build and could be a model hands down and says the same thing. LOL

My gf just learned what drag racing is and can tell you what a torque converter and fast intake are and can name few other car parts since dating me! Hopefully she'll be taking my C6 down the 1320 next year.

take care-


Quick Reply: 364 cu in, AFR 225's or 235's?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:43 AM.