New LS1 Owners - Newbie Tech Basic Technical Questions & Advice
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

2001 WS6 vs. 2001 T/A

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-15-2004, 10:47 AM
  #1  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Bklynstanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charlotte, N.C.
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 2001 WS6 vs. 2001 T/A

Sorry about beating this topic into the ground but I'm confused about something. Why is the 2001 WS6 rated at 320 H.P and the 2001 T/A rated at 310 H.P. It's the same engine and the only real major differences are the Ram Air Hood Scoop (that's still debatable if it increases HP or not) the 17" tires and the suspension.
Old 03-15-2004, 10:58 AM
  #2  
TECH Addict
iTrader: (70)
 
chpmnsws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Springfield IL
Posts: 2,525
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

hood scoop and a more free flowing exhaust
Old 03-15-2004, 12:32 PM
  #3  
Teching In
 
frozyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's another recent topic on the subject:

https://ls1tech.com/forums//showthread.php?t=149330
Old 03-15-2004, 01:39 PM
  #4  
TECH Apprentice
Thread Starter
 
Bklynstanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Charlotte, N.C.
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So is it a correct assumption that in real #'s, WS6 and T/A should be the same HP?
Old 03-15-2004, 01:48 PM
  #5  
TECH Addict
 
ActionJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bklynstanger
Sorry about beating this topic into the ground but I'm confused about something. Why is the 2001 WS6 rated at 320 H.P and the 2001 T/A rated at 310 H.P. It's the same engine and the only real major differences are the Ram Air Hood Scoop (that's still debatable if it increases HP or not) the 17" tires and the suspension.
I thought the WS6 for 2001 was rated at 325 HP?

http://www.mpt.org/motorweek/reviews/rt2148a.shtml

Old 03-15-2004, 02:19 PM
  #6  
Moderator
iTrader: (11)
 
jimmyblue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: East Central Florida
Posts: 12,605
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts

Default

Probably more about the lid than the 'scoop itself.
Any model that ditches the base resonator lid is
going to get rid of substantial intake pressure drop
at higher flows.

For the SS in '02 there was 10 "rated HP" for the
Blackwing lid and 10 "rated HP" for the SLP exhausts
(CME or D/D). Ala carte; your SS might have come
with both, either or none. Mine had a 335HP window
sticker, I had to buy my own lid.

Then again, they're GM's "ratings" and they can make
up whatever # they like, as long as they can meet the
minimum. Funny "segmenting" horsepower rating tricks
are the norm, a fine long General Motors tradition.
Old 03-15-2004, 04:39 PM
  #7  
jrp
SN95 Director
iTrader: (16)
 
jrp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Valencia, Ca
Posts: 10,755
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts

Default



havent people learned yet that the ratings for the fbodies dont mean ****, its what they put down to the ground
Old 03-15-2004, 05:52 PM
  #8  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Benjamin Russick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Yep. The listed HP ratings were a joke. You are better off grouping the LS1 F-bodies by year, than by model...
Old 03-15-2004, 07:35 PM
  #9  
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,128
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by jimmyblue
Probably more about the lid than the 'scoop itself.
Any model that ditches the base resonator lid is
going to get rid of substantial intake pressure drop
at higher flows.

For the SS in '02 there was 10 "rated HP" for the
Blackwing lid and 10 "rated HP" for the SLP exhausts
(CME or D/D). Ala carte; your SS might have come
with both, either or none. Mine had a 335HP window
sticker, I had to buy my own lid.

Then again, they're GM's "ratings" and they can make
up whatever # they like, as long as they can meet the
minimum. Funny "segmenting" horsepower rating tricks
are the norm, a fine long General Motors tradition.
The Firehawk came standard with the 345hp package in 02. I am pretty sure that the WS6 doesn't get a different lid, it just gets a taller inlet underneath the lid... I might be wrong though.
Old 03-16-2004, 12:30 AM
  #10  
Teching In
 
98FormulaWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

The WS6 does not have a different lid, but rather just as he stated above about a taller inlet to the lid intake system. It slightly more room for the air to flow from the ram air. Just the Ram Air hood/less restrictive exhaust/nice 17's wheels/steering wheel cooler/32mm front sway bar/ and I think 1 more thing I missing are the differences between standard T/A and WS6 T/A.
Old 03-16-2004, 12:32 PM
  #11  
TECH Resident
 
16nrollininaws6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Land of rocks and boredom
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jrp


havent people learned yet that the ratings for the fbodies dont mean ****, its what they put down to the ground
JRP is right. The ratings are trash in two ways. The first is that at the engine horsepower is nothing, it's what gets to the ground. An A4 vs. an M6 stock for stock will put less to the ground because of the drivetrain loss of the A4. The second reason they are a joke is because GM underrated the HP on the LS1. On '01's and '02's with an M6 you can usually put to the wheels what GM rated at the motor, or damn close. Its all about what gets to the ground, not the "HP rating".
Old 03-16-2004, 01:27 PM
  #12  
TECH Addict
 
ActionJack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

So your point is.....

Put your Feakin car on a Dyno and then you will know what your Freakin HP is!

But it is nice to have a general idea and that is when Manufacturer ratings and others are a good source. The 01 to 02 as an idea is 310 for a TA/Z28 and 325 for a WS6.



Also, I may be wrong (please give it to me if I am), but the WS6 has an aluminum drive shaft.......
Old 03-16-2004, 03:38 PM
  #13  
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,128
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by ActionJack
So your point is.....

Put your Feakin car on a Dyno and then you will know what your Freakin HP is!

But it is nice to have a general idea and that is when Manufacturer ratings and others are a good source. The 01 to 02 as an idea is 310 for a TA/Z28 and 325 for a WS6.



Also, I may be wrong (please give it to me if I am), but the WS6 has an aluminum drive shaft.......
No, all 6 speed cars had the aluminum driveshaft.
Old 03-16-2004, 04:04 PM
  #14  
TECH Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Benjamin Russick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 1,493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Even autos with the 3.23 gears had the aluminum driveshaft. It will come down to driver and build tolerances for any one of these Ls1 F-bodys. You can throw the factory ratings in the trash...
Old 03-16-2004, 04:14 PM
  #15  
Launching!
 
KimberWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vincennes,IN
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Well my '01 WS6 A4 has aluminum driveshaft
My dyno numbers , bone stock was 290HP & 301TQ running WAY rich.
Old 03-16-2004, 05:10 PM
  #16  
11 Second Club
iTrader: (1)
 
INMY01TA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Crofton Md.
Posts: 3,235
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by KimberWS6
Well my '01 WS6 A4 has aluminum driveshaft
My dyno numbers , bone stock was 290HP & 301TQ running WAY rich.
Aluminum is for beer cans, not driveshafts. A friend of mine snapped his in half last weekend at the track with only a lid, cutout, drag radials, and a Mcleod clutch.
Old 03-16-2004, 05:58 PM
  #17  
Launching!
 
KimberWS6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vincennes,IN
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Didn't say how long it was going to stay in there though
Old 03-16-2004, 07:24 PM
  #18  
It's not mine! woo hoo!
iTrader: (7)
 
demonspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 7,128
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts

Default

I guess I should add that 3.23 optioned 4L60E cars had the aluminum driveshaft too. So only the 2.77 cars didn't have the aluminum driveshaft.
Old 03-16-2004, 07:42 PM
  #19  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
git_sum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DMNSPD
I guess I should add that 3.23 optioned 4L60E cars had the aluminum driveshaft too. So only the 2.77 cars didn't have the aluminum driveshaft.
Well i'm pretty sure my car has 2.73's and i know for a fact that it has an aluminum driveshaft. It's a 99 Trans-am A4. So i'm not real sure if that whole only A4's wiht 3.23's have aluminum driveshafts is true
Old 03-16-2004, 07:48 PM
  #20  
TECH Enthusiast
iTrader: (10)
 
git_sum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Central Kentucky
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts

Default

Originally Posted by DMNSPD
I guess I should add that 3.23 optioned 4L60E cars had the aluminum driveshaft too. So only the 2.77 cars didn't have the aluminum driveshaft.
I thought they had 2.73's instead of 2.77's?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 AM.